Hi,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:36:24AM -0400, Arthur Peters wrote:
> I have a Compaq R3000z and I have found that it does suspend and resume
> properly when I use "./s2ram -f -s -p". Also I am using the most resent
> Ubuntu Edgy (development version) kernel
> (linux-image-2.6.17-8-genericversion
I have a Compaq R3000z and I have found that it does suspend and resume properly when I use "./s2ram -f -s -p". Also I am using the most resent Ubuntu Edgy (development version) kernel (linux-image-2.6.17-8-generic
version 2.6.17-8.22). I think it has some IDE resume patches that prevent IDE fro
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:11:14AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:56:52PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> >> What video card does this machine have?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci|grep VGA
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:55:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:06:58AM -0400, Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> > >
> > > --
> > > sys_vendor = "Acer"
> > > sys_product = "Aspire 2010"
> > >
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:11:14AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:56:52PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> >> What video card does this machine have?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci|grep VGA
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller:
Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:56:52PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>> What video card does this machine have?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci|grep VGA
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility
> Radeon 9600 M10]
Ahem. I have the same card
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:56:52PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have taken the suspend-devel mailing list into CC, maybe somebody over
> there has an idea.
That seems like an implicit bit of advice :), so I've just joined the
list. Thanks!
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:06:58AM -0400
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 19:56, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have taken the suspend-devel mailing list into CC, maybe somebody over
> there has an idea.
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:06:58AM -0400, Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > Here's a record of my tests of 's2ram' -
Hi,
i have taken the suspend-devel mailing list into CC, maybe somebody over
there has an idea.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:06:58AM -0400, Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Here's a record of my tests of 's2ram' - hope you find it useful!
>
> -
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:38:53 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed 2006-09-20 14:20:19, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> >
> > > But I think those two lines do not hurt and saves packagers (me;) the
> > > bother of having
On Wed 2006-09-20 14:20:19, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > But I think those two lines do not hurt and saves packagers (me;) the
> > bother of having to edit the makefile everytime they sync with upstream.
>
> ACK. I also have to edit
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> But I think those two lines do not hurt and saves packagers (me;) the
> bother of having to edit the makefile everytime they sync with upstream.
ACK. I also have to edit out the mknod in my build. This option saves me
a local patch.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:44:46 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Many people have udev, which will make /dev/snapshot dynamically if
> > support is available in the kernel. And if it didn't, making it from the
> > Makefile wouldn't be a solution because it would disappear on
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:01, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many people have udev, which will make /dev/snapshot dynamically if
> support is available in the kernel. And if it didn't, making it from the
> Makefile wouldn't be a solution because it would disappear on the next
> reboot.
> T
Hi!
> Many people have udev, which will make /dev/snapshot dynamically if
> support is available in the kernel. And if it didn't, making it from the
> Makefile wouldn't be a solution because it would disappear on the next
> reboot.
> This patch adds another CONFIG option to the Makefile to not mak
Hi,
Many people have udev, which will make /dev/snapshot dynamically if
support is available in the kernel. And if it didn't, making it from the
Makefile wouldn't be a solution because it would disappear on the next
reboot.
This patch adds another CONFIG option to the Makefile to not make /dev/sna
On Wed 2006-09-20 09:47:59, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:01:26 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 00:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, certainly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd go for 1% steps.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:01:26 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 00:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > > Yes, certainly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd go for 1% steps. If someone finds it slows his machine down,
> > > > > > he's the o
18 matches
Mail list logo
