On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:00:00PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 5 February 2007 16:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Okay, I'll try to figure out what I need to change (if anything ;-)).
>
> Well, that was hard. :-(
Bad. I tried to document it as good as possible on the opensuse wi
On Tuesday, 6 February 2007 22:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > I think I can prepare the -mm patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks, i owe you one :-)
> >
> > Ah, no big deal, that was easy. ;-) Patch appended.
>
> Can you add my ACK and send it to akpm? Or do you want me to do it?
I'll send.
Gre
Hi!
> > > I think I can prepare the -mm patch.
> >
> > Thanks, i owe you one :-)
>
> Ah, no big deal, that was easy. ;-) Patch appended.
Can you add my ACK and send it to akpm? Or do you want me to do it?
Pavel
> Rafael
>
On Monday, 5 February 2007 16:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 5 February 2007 06:46, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:05:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 3 February 2007 22:02, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0
On Monday, 5 February 2007 06:46, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:05:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 3 February 2007 22:02, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I can prepare
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:05:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 February 2007 22:02, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > I think I can prepare the -mm patch.
> >
> > Thanks, i owe you one :-)
>
> Ah, no big d
On Saturday, 3 February 2007 22:02, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > I think I can prepare the -mm patch.
>
> Thanks, i owe you one :-)
Ah, no big deal, that was easy. ;-) Patch appended.
An unrelated question: what do I need to
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I think I can prepare the -mm patch.
Thanks, i owe you one :-)
> > Unfortunately i can not get it to -suse, since i don't have any access, so
> > it will probably still be up to you to do that. But i will attach the
> > patch
Hi!
> > > for a copy) and get it to the -suse, and I'll get it to the -mm. Ok?
>
> I think I can prepare the -mm patch.
Ok, thanks!
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.
On Friday, 2 February 2007 16:08, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Lets make a deal. You retransmit a patch (so I don't have to search
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff -rup linux-2.6.20-rc6.orig/kernel/pow
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Lets make a deal. You retransmit a patch (so I don't have to search
Signed-off-by: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -rup linux-2.6.20-rc6.orig/kernel/power/main.c
linux-2.6.20-rc6/kernel/power/main.c
--- linux-2.6.20-rc6.or
Hi!
> > Not exactly, but one of them removes most of the code in user.c that Seife's
> > patch fixes and the other changes code ordering in main.c in an incompatible
> > way.
> >
> > I'd really prefer to get a fix on top of -mm right now and this bug has been
> > there for _ages_.
>
> Rafael, ca
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:05:27AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Not exactly, but one of them removes most of the code in user.c that Seife's
> patch fixes and the other changes code ordering in main.c in an incompatible
> way.
>
> I'd really prefer to get a fix on top of -mm right now and th
Hi!
> > (Sorry, forgot ccs at the first try).
> >
> > > > in the light of https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230470 we
> > > > found out that the SNAPSHOT_PMOPS syscall does not handle non-ACPI
> > > > systems gracefully.
> > > >
> > > > Pavel did the first oops-preventing patch, i hack
On Friday, 2 February 2007 00:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> (Sorry, forgot ccs at the first try).
>
> > > in the light of https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230470 we
> > > found out that the SNAPSHOT_PMOPS syscall does not handle non-ACPI
> > > systems gracefully.
> > >
> > > Pavel
Hi!
(Sorry, forgot ccs at the first try).
> > in the light of https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230470 we
> > found out that the SNAPSHOT_PMOPS syscall does not handle non-ACPI
> > systems gracefully.
> >
> > Pavel did the first oops-preventing patch, i hacked it up a bit.
> >
> > Any
On Thursday, 1 February 2007 22:51, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the light of https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230470 we
> found out that the SNAPSHOT_PMOPS syscall does not handle non-ACPI
> systems gracefully.
>
> Pavel did the first oops-preventing patch, i hacked it up a bit
Hi,
in the light of https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230470 we
found out that the SNAPSHOT_PMOPS syscall does not handle non-ACPI
systems gracefully.
Pavel did the first oops-preventing patch, i hacked it up a bit.
Any comments before i send it to lkml? Better return values?
diff -ru
18 matches
Mail list logo
