On Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:59, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:00:08 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 23 January 2007 10:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > Split the opening of resume_dev and retrieval of the header from
> > >
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:00:08 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 January 2007 10:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Split the opening of resume_dev and retrieval of the header from
> > > read_image into a new function. That way we can do something else if
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:00:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 January 2007 10:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Split the opening of resume_dev and retrieval of the header from
> > > read_image into a new function. That way we can do something else if
> > > everything
On Tuesday, 23 January 2007 10:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Split the opening of resume_dev and retrieval of the header from
> > read_image into a new function. That way we can do something else if
> > everything is OK, but there just isn't an image.
> > The new function return ENOMEDIUM in
Hi!
> Split the opening of resume_dev and retrieval of the header from
> read_image into a new function. That way we can do something else if
> everything is OK, but there just isn't an image.
> The new function return ENOMEDIUM in case of no image, better
> suggestions welcome.
Looks ok to me.
Split the opening of resume_dev and retrieval of the header from
read_image into a new function. That way we can do something else if
everything is OK, but there just isn't an image.
The new function return ENOMEDIUM in case of no image, better
suggestions welcome.
diff -u ../suspend-cvs-1/resume
