Re: [Suspend-devel] resume in /usr/sbin

2007-01-10 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:23:46PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:10:49 +0100 > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just noticed that the new version of the Makefile installs resume > > in /usr/sbin (or whatever you configured $(DESTDIR)$(SUSPEND_DIR)

Re: [Suspend-devel] resume in /usr/sbin

2007-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 10 January 2007 13:23, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:10:49 +0100 > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just noticed that the new version of the Makefile installs resume > > in /usr/sbin (or whatever you configured $(DESTDIR)$(SUSPEND_DIR) to be

Re: [Suspend-devel] resume in /usr/sbin

2007-01-10 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:10:49 +0100 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that the new version of the Makefile installs resume > in /usr/sbin (or whatever you configured $(DESTDIR)$(SUSPEND_DIR) to be). > Is there any reason to do that? It's not that you would be calling

[Suspend-devel] resume in /usr/sbin

2007-01-10 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I just noticed that the new version of the Makefile installs resume in /usr/sbin (or whatever you configured $(DESTDIR)$(SUSPEND_DIR) to be). Is there any reason to do that? It's not that you would be calling it by hand on a normal running system... Of course you need the binary on initrd or