On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:45:04PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:53:37 +0100
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:53:37 +0100
Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we should not have the
> > option to compile it in our Makefile.
> >
> > Inst
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we should not have the
> option to compile it in our Makefile.
>
> Instead, we should update the documentation to tell the users that they
> should obtain the th
On Monday, 19 March 2007 23:46, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:21:16 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hm, I think I misunderstood the issue.
> >
> > Can anyone please explain to me what the current situation is and why it may
> > be a good idea to change
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:56:45 +0100
Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I can't see how people can `depend' on it. Especially since this is
> > > only in CVS since a few days. Also libx86 isn't in CVS anymore so they
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I can't see how people can `depend' on it. Especially since this is
> > only in CVS since a few days. Also libx86 isn't in CVS anymore so they
> > will have to get it anyway. The only difference is that instead of
> > typing two
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:21:16 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, I think I misunderstood the issue.
>
> Can anyone please explain to me what the current situation is and why it may
> be a good idea to change it (or not)?
libx86 is a dependency of vbetool. Since the new rel
On Monday, 19 March 2007 21:46, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:27:50 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:27:50 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> > > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier...
> >
> > > I removed all the removed x86em
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier...
>
> > I removed all the removed x86emu files from the inlined patch, they are
> > included in the attached
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier...
> I removed all the removed x86emu files from the inlined patch, they are
> included in the attached bzip'ed diff
X86emu is no longer present in CVS right? Why do we then not
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:21:32PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 March 2007 16:05, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch moves our codebase to vbetool-1.0 (with very minor differences).
> > It also enables building against either a system-wide installed libx86, or
On Wednesday, 14 March 2007 16:05, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch moves our codebase to vbetool-1.0 (with very minor differences).
> It also enables building against either a system-wide installed libx86, or
> against a locally copied libx86 tree inside the suspend directory.
>
> I r
14 matches
Mail list logo
