Re: [Suspend-devel] Success in s2ram

2007-05-16 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:18:17PM +0300, Noam Raphael wrote: > On 02/05/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri 2007-04-27 18:06:06, Noam Raphael wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I tried s2ram, and wasn't on the whitelist, but it seems to work fine. > > > Hurray! The first time suspe

Re: [Suspend-devel] Success in s2ram

2007-05-02 Thread Noam Raphael
On 02/05/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri 2007-04-27 18:06:06, Noam Raphael wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I tried s2ram, and wasn't on the whitelist, but it seems to work fine. > > Hurray! The first time suspend to ram worked for me on linux! > > > > Here's the output of s2ram -i: >

Re: [Suspend-devel] Success in s2ram

2007-05-02 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2007-04-27 18:06:06, Noam Raphael wrote: > Hello, > > I tried s2ram, and wasn't on the whitelist, but it seems to work fine. > Hurray! The first time suspend to ram worked for me on linux! > > Here's the output of s2ram -i: > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "IBM" >

Re: [Suspend-devel] Success in s2ram

2007-05-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Sorry, it should probably not go in the white list yet. I once > suspended to ram and the display was problematic - it had problems > with repaint and moving, so things looked really strange. It went away > when I suspended to disk again. In all other times, it worked fine. It is probably "

Re: [Suspend-devel] Success in s2ram

2007-04-27 Thread Noam Raphael
Hello, Sorry, it should probably not go in the white list yet. I once suspended to ram and the display was problematic - it had problems with repaint and moving, so things looked really strange. It went away when I suspended to disk again. In all other times, it worked fine. Thanks, Noam On 27/0