On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:17:44AM -0400, C Herron wrote:
>sys_vendor = "FUJITSU"
>sys_product = "FPC07033AK"
>sys_version = " "
>bios_version = "Version 1.05 "
>
> No special options needed, just s2ram -f.
Both from X and from the text console?
Thanks for reporting :-)
--
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 22:43 -0400, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
> (ps: Is the whitelist on-line somewhere? If I had found a pointer
> to it, I would have checked it before sending email. I used
> s2ram from Debian Etch/4.0 --- and maybe this entry has already
> been added to the lis
(re-added suspend-devel to cc:-list)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:32:33PM -0400, Tim Creech wrote:
> Hello,
>It does work from both X and a text console. I actually was just setting
Ok, i have added it to the whitelist.
> up the machine for a friend, so I don't have it on hand anymore, but I
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:48:25PM -0700, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> My Thinkpad X40 matches an UNSURE entry, as of current Debian unstable
> (0.6~cvs20070618-1):
>
> Machine matched entry 321:
> sys_vendor = 'IBM'
> sys_product = '2386*'
> sys_version = ''
> b
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 12:36:19AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not on the list, so please contact me directly if necessary
>
> Hope this helps! You guys have saved me a lot of trouble!
Yes it does, i have added the machine to the whitelist now :-)
>
> Sincerely,
> Michael W
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:00:24PM -0400, Tim Creech wrote:
> Hi,
>I just tried s2ram on my Lenovo 3000 n100 run as "s2ram -f" with a fresh
> install of opensuse 10.2. Suspends perfectly. Below is the output of
> s2ram -i:
>
> # s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendo
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:43:06PM -0400, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> I've got an HP/Compaq Presario C500 series laptop (C554US),
> and "s2ram -f" worked just fine. It was quite a nice surprise.
>
> % s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:12:47PM +, Jasper Mackenzie wrote:
> Good day,
> I have managed to get a Clevo D470K working with s2ram under the following
> conditions:
> Bios, OS set to "other", not Win9x/xp
> Video driver using radeon from xorg NOT fglrx
>
> vga=0
> I have additionaly got acpi_
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:42:56PM +0200, Arild Haugstad wrote:
> My computer is not on the current (in CVS) whitelist.
>
> s2ram -f -a 1 works, both in X and console.
>
> Output from s2ram -i:
> sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS"
> sys_product = "AMILO Pro V3205"
> sys_version = "Rev 1"
> bios_v
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:11:07PM +0200, Florian Herrmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have Suse 10.2 installed.
>
> This is s2ram -i:
>
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS"
> sys_product = "AMILO Pro V2040"
> sys_version = "20 "
> bios_
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:40:47PM +0100, Peter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just wanted to let you know that s2ram works perfectly on a HP nx6310
> using s2ram -f
>
> I tried this with Opensuse10.2.
>
> I was able to use s2ram from console within KDE. Unfortunately I can't
> find any information on how t
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 09:41:02AM +, Benoît Monin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Just adding -f is the only thing needed to make suspend to ram works from
> console and X.
>
> current OS : opensuse 10.2
>
> #s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Compaq"
> sys_produ
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 08:38:20AM +0100, Jiří Němec wrote:
> Hi
> My ThinkPad R51e works fine with s2ram -f -a 3.
>
> Zavazadlo blupix # s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "IBM"
> sys_product = "18436NG"
> sys_version = "ThinkPad R51e"
> bios_version
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:17:32AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 04:00:27PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> >> The following system seems to "just work" with "s2ram -f":
> >>
> >> # s2ram -i
> >> This machine can be identifi
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 04:00:27PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>> The following system seems to "just work" with "s2ram -f":
>>
>> # s2ram -i
>> This machine can be identified by:
>> sys_vendor = "Fujitsu Siemens"
>> sys_product = "P6VAP-
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 04:00:27PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> The following system seems to "just work" with "s2ram -f":
>
> # s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Fujitsu Siemens"
> sys_product = "P6VAP-AP"
> sys_version = " "
> bios_version =
Hi,
(i took the suspend-devel list into cc:)
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 06:45:07PM +, Phil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> rhubarb:~ # s2ram
> Machine is unknown.
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard"
> sys_product = "HP Pavilion dv2000 (RG404UA#ABA)"
> sys
And works from X and text console...
Dne sobota 13 leden 2007 00:42 jste napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> s2ram works fine on my laptop with -p parameter (s2ram -f -p).
>
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard"
> sys_product = "HP Compaq nx6310 (EY588ES#AKB)"
> sys
Hi!
> s2ram works fine on my laptop with -p parameter (s2ram -f -p).
>
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard"
> sys_product = "HP Compaq nx6310 (EY588ES#AKB)"
> sys_version = "F.09"
> bios_version = "68YDU Ver. F.09"
Does it work okay from both
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:19:20PM -0700, Luke Myers wrote:
> Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>>Ok. Just curious: "-f -p -m" did not work? It does not restore console
>> _content_, but a vt switch should fix that. But it usually should work
>> in most cases where "-s" is successful (and as recent trouble wi
Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:39:50PM -0500, Luke Myers wrote:
Hello,
Thanks so much for the great resources on suspending to RAM. Here is the
info for my system:
Hardware:
sys_vendor = "Dell Computer Corporation"
sys_product = "Latitude CPx J8
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:39:50PM -0500, Luke Myers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks so much for the great resources on suspending to RAM. Here is the
> info for my system:
>
> Hardware:
> sys_vendor = "Dell Computer Corporation"
> sys_product = "Latitude CPx J800GT "
>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Bontemps Camille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I test s2ram on my aspire 3610 with Debian etch.
>
> go-to-sun:/home/camille# s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
>sys_vendor = "Acer"
>sys_product = "Aspire 3610"
>sys_version = "0100
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:04:57PM +0200, LucaB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to report success using s2ram on the following machine:
>
> lucaws4:~# s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Acer, inc."
> sys_product = "TravelMate 4100 "
> sys_version
On Wed 2006-08-09 22:21:47, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On 8/9/06, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:31:59 +0200
> > Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, plus huge comment saying what stupid manufacturer did this
> > > :-). Assuming there's only one i
On 8/9/06, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:31:59 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, plus huge comment saying what stupid manufacturer did this
> > :-). Assuming there's only one i***t making notebooks, it will
> > actually work okay.
>
> I di
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:31:59 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, plus huge comment saying what stupid manufacturer did this
> :-). Assuming there's only one i***t making notebooks, it will
> actually work okay.
I didn't say it's notebook :-). It's desktop computer. And as I can s
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:50:16PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We got the report (twice :-).
> > The only other notes I have is that:
> > 1) This is a desktop PC (ASUS A7V600, AMD Barton 2800+, ATI X700 Pro
> > AGP, 2 GB DDR 400)
>
> ...but desktop PCs are little trickier to whitelist
Hi!
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Heh... right solution here would be to make them fix their BIOS.
>
> Hmm, I just tried two latest and it says "stem manufacturer" instead of
> "System manufacturer", what a great improvement.
>
> > Or you could submit a patch to add required f
Hi
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:50:33 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh... right solution here would be to make them fix their BIOS.
Hmm, I just tried two latest and it says "stem manufacturer" instead of
"System manufacturer", what a great improvement.
> Or you could submit a patch
Hi!
> I hope this is right place to write :-).
Yes.
> On ASUS P5LD2-VM s2ram -f works fine, here is output of s2ram -i:
>
> sys_vendor = "System manufacturer"
> sys_product = "System Product Name"
> sys_version = "System Version"
> bios_version = "0406"
>
> Using Board
Hi!
We got the report (twice :-).
> The info is:
> "
> myPC:~# s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
>sys_vendor = "System Manufacturer"
>sys_product = "System Name"
>sys_version = "System Version"
>bios_version = "ASUS A7V600 ACPI BIOS Revision 1008"
> See http://en.o
On Wed 2006-06-28 10:30:29, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:29:13 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > I added my machines to the whitelist.c. One is a desktop system,
> > > 's2ram -n' only identifies it with the bios version. Also the work
> > > around
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:29:13 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I added my machines to the whitelist.c. One is a desktop system,
> > 's2ram -n' only identifies it with the bios version. Also the work
> > around is likely to be only necessary because of the video card
> > (n
On Tue 2006-06-27 13:17:18, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added my machines to the whitelist.c. One is a desktop system, 's2ram
> -n' only identifies it with the bios version. Also the work around is
> likely to be only necessary because of the video card (nvidia riva tnt)
> I use, isn't it? So
Hi!
> I added my machines to the whitelist.c. One is a desktop system, 's2ram
> -n' only identifies it with the bios version. Also the work around is
> likely to be only necessary because of the video card (nvidia riva tnt)
> I use, isn't it? So I don't know if it is wise to add it. Seems like a
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
