On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:51:08 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 16:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > [ Not need to cc, I joined the list ]
> >
> > I'll cc you anyway; because otherwise _other_ Ccs will get lost (and
> > some people -- like me
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 16:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > [ Not need to cc, I joined the list ]
>
> I'll cc you anyway; because otherwise _other_ Ccs will get lost (and
> some people -- like me -- prefer to be cced even when they are
> subscribed).
>
> > > I guess that having s2ram and s2
Hi!
> [ Not need to cc, I joined the list ]
I'll cc you anyway; because otherwise _other_ Ccs will get lost (and
some people -- like me -- prefer to be cced even when they are
subscribed).
> > I guess that having s2ram and s2disk makes sense. Not sure about
> > s2both, I hate hardlink tricks...
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 10:11, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> [ Not need to cc, I joined the list ]
>
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:10 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I guess that having s2ram and s2disk makes sense. Not sure about
> > s2both, I hate hardlink tricks... but I guess we
[ Not need to cc, I joined the list ]
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:10 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess that having s2ram and s2disk makes sense. Not sure about
> s2both, I hate hardlink tricks... but I guess we can do that.
They're actually symlink, but I guess you hate those
Hi!
> [ Not need to cc, I joined the list ]
> > > Second, suspend is not a good name for a binary. Because (as other
> > > people have brought up already) suspend is a build in command in
> > > bash.
> >
> > This was rasied a few days ago, it was decided to change name after
> > 0.2.
>
> OK, th
[ Not need to cc, I joined the list ]
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:22:40 +0200
Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Il Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:11:23PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra ha scritto:
> > Second, suspend is not a good name for a binary. Because (as other
> > people have brought up already) suspend is a bu
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:08:32 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > While packaging suspend I ran in a few design problems, which I
> > solved (IMHO) in an elegant way.
> >
> > First the fact that if you want to both suspend-to-disk and
> > suspend-to-both in a regular basis y
Il Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:11:23PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra ha scritto:
> Second, suspend is not a good name for a binary. Because (as other
> people have brought up already) suspend is a build in command in bash.
This was rasied a few days ago, it was decided to change name after 0.2.
> Also it is a
Hi!
> While packaging suspend I ran in a few design problems, which I solved
> (IMHO) in an elegant way.
>
> First the fact that if you want to both suspend-to-disk and
> suspend-to-both in a regular basis you need to config files which
> are identical except for a line 'suspend to both ='.
Why?
10 matches
Mail list logo
