http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2016/03/10/3758832/dimock-fracking-case-decided/

CLIMATE
Family Wins Case Against Fracking Company After 7 Years Of Polluted Drinking 
Water
BY KATIE 
VALENTINE<http://thinkprogress.org/?person=kvalentine>[http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/cap-byline/bird_blue_16.png]<https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=KatieRValentine>
 MAR 10, 2016 4:21 PM
[http://cdn.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/10160431/AP_12011303668-1024x706.jpg]
CREDIT: AP PHOTO/JACQUELINE LARMA



Two Pennsylvania families who have been fighting to prove that a fracking 
company polluted their well water got a major win in court this week. A federal 
jury awarded the Dimock, PA residents $4.24 million Thursday, after finding 
that Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. — one of Pennsylvania’s largest oil and gas 
companies — guilty of polluting their well water with methane.
The couples — Nolen Scott Ely, Monica Marta-Ely, and Raymond and Victoria 
Hubert — first sued Cabot back in 2009, the Times-Tribune of Scranton 
reports<http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/jury-awards-two-dimock-twp-couples-4-24-million-cabot-plans-appeal-1.2017316>,
 a suit that at the time was joined by about 40 other 
homeowners<http://wnep.com/2016/02/22/picking-a-jury-for-water-contamination-lawsuit/>,
 all alleging well water pollution from Cabot’s oil and gas activities. That 
suit reached a settlement with most of the plaintiffs in 2012, but the Elys and 
Huberts refused to settle, deciding instead to continue fighting the case in 
federal court.
A teary Nolen Scott 
Ely<http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/jury-awards-two-dimock-twp-couples-4-24-million-cabot-plans-appeal-1.2017316>
 said after the trial that he was “at a loss for words” over the agreement.
“There were six Goliaths in there, and all I had was just a little pea stone,” 
he said of Cabot’s legal team. “It was quite the battle, and as you heard 
today, we’re at the end. It’s done.”
Ely also said the suit wasn’t about the money, but about getting the word out 
that Cabot “did something wrong.”
“We’re voicing ourselves, we’re standing up for our rights,” he said. “We 
walked into the courtroom with our heads held high.”
The jury ruled 
Thursday<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48182083/cabot_verdict.pdf> that 
the two couples had “proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Cabot was 
negligent in the drilling or completing” of the wells near their homes. It also 
ruled that Cabot “negligently created a private nuisance” which harmed the 
couples and caused them to lose the “use and enjoyment of their property.” The 
jury awarded $2.6 million to the Elys, along with $50,000 to each of their 
children, and $1.4 million to the Huberts.
“You have to really live it in order to feel it,” Monica Ely told WNEP in 
February<http://wnep.com/2016/02/22/picking-a-jury-for-water-contamination-lawsuit/>,
 before the trial started. “We haven’t had clean water since my son was in 
kindergarten, and now he’s in seventh grade, so they don’t know any different 
and it’s not a normal way of life.”
Cabot, however, has maintained that the higher-than-normal methane levels in 
the plaintiffs’ wells aren’t from their operations.
“Cabot is surprised at the jury’s verdict given the lack of evidence provided 
by plaintiffs in support of their nuisance claim,” the company said in a 
statement. “The verdict disregards overwhelming scientific and factual evidence 
that Cabot acted as a prudent operator in conducting its operations.”
The company also said it would be “filing motions with the Court to set the 
verdict aside based upon lack of evidence as well as conduct of plaintiff’s 
counsel calculated to deprive Cabot of a fair trial.”
Dimock, which was featured in the 2010 fracking documentary “Gasland,” has been 
called “ground zero<https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/tag/dimock/>” in 
the fight over fracking. Cabot alone has had 130 drilling 
violations<https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2016/02/22/dimock-residents-take-their-case-to-federal-court/>
 in Dimock, and is currently 
prohibited<http://ecowatch.com/2016/03/10/cabot-dimock-fracking-case/> from 
drilling anywhere within a nine-mile radius of the township. Research has found 
that in Pennsylvania, fracking operations are more likely to be 
located<http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/05/08/3656456/fracking-in-poor-pennsylvania/>
 in lower-income, rural regions like Dimock. The state made 
public<http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/08/29/3477184/pennsylvania-fracking-water-contamination/>
 243 cases of contamination of private drinking wells from oil and gas 
operations in 2014.
Water contamination has also been 
linked<http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/01/05/some-states-confirm-water-pollution-from-drilling/4328859/>
 to oil and gas operations in Texas, Ohio, 
California<http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2016/02/05/3746653/california-link-earthquakes-fracking/>,
 and West Virginia. A study last year, which sought to figure out how oil and 
gas operations could end up contaminating water, found that casing and 
cementing failures in wells — not the acutal fracking process — was often to 
blame<http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/09/15/3567369/fracking-water-contamination-casing/>.
 This potential for operations to contaminate water has led several 
environmental groups to call for more rigorous oversight of the industry.
“This is a huge victory for the people of Dimock, but it’s also a sharp rebuke 
to the Obama administration for failing to fully investigate fracking’s 
contamination of water supplies in Pennsylvania and across the country,” Kassie 
Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law 
Institute, said in a statement. “Because of the EPA’s disturbing history of 
delay and denial, it took a federal jury to set the record straight about 
hydraulic fracturing’s toxic threat to our water.”
TAGS

  *   Fracking<http://thinkprogress.org/tag/fracking/>


For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/
If you have questions about this list please contact the list manager, Tom 
Shelley, at t...@cornell.edu.

Reply via email to