...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080110/58248af2/attachment.html
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org
Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080110/ce08b1b5/attachment.html
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman
Pannirselvam,
Happy New Year to you from India. Good to see your mail after
a long time, but I'm quite confused by it.
I thought Keith only reported what YOU wrote earlier on 9/25/2006
(regarding mixing ~20% BD and 5-10% ethanol into (fresh/used) VO
to reduce viscosity).
Could you please specif
blelists.org
> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
> messages):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bi
g
> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
> messages):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello E.
>
> Lots of stuff snipped.
Nicely done Keith. (as always)
keep up the good work!
--
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel
Manick Harris wrote:
>
> a lot of folks email addresses snipped
>
> Subject: Fw: is this true
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:03:56 -0500
>other stuff snipped.
> Subject: is this true
>
>
>
>> SWEET POISON
>> A MUST READ
Very interesting read indeed.
That said, some fact checking puts this w
/solar-concentrator
Problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080110/bf4cb6cd/attachmen
Industry doesn't want to sell them voluntarily, they want to be "forced" to do
so, lest someone else come in with a simpler, more common-sensical alternative.
But they do want to sell them, lots of them, for huge prices. That's why
they're pushing this "industry can do it but perversely refuse t
Hi Chip,
You wrote:
> And yes, for the record, I am not a big fan of 'payback costs'
> when it comes to passive vs utility consumption.
>
> When the power goes out, passive systems continue to work.
Some aspects of "payback" can be difficult to quantify or even anticipate.
Gardening:
Shovel
John Mullan wrote:
> I've seen that before. Excellent idea. I wonder how much all that
> copper, insulation, etc. would cost (for purpose of payback period)?
When calculating the 'payback period' be sure to deduct (or add)
the cost of a couple of medium term power outages, as folks all
across t
11 matches
Mail list logo
