Ya know, that does sound a
lot like Dubya. Wow.
Peace, D. Mindock
- Original Message -
From:
Gary L.
Green
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 9:53
PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] [SPAM] Re: BYU
professor's group accuses U.S.
Bull pucky, mate.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sbt.htm
Have a look. When you figure in the angle of the supposed snipers
nest there is just no way.
That dog don't hunt.
I collected a variety of Kennedy assassination information from so
many sources. Most of it destroyed when my hard drive
Okeedokee.I'm not into putting a lot of energy into this argument. Suffice to say that I haven't seen a compelling argument tochange my opinion - even after visiting http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sbt.htm.Mike "Gary L. Green" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bull pucky,
Another unanswered question: why were the massive steel beams quickly
gathered up and
ship off for scrap? Is it because the beams might've shown that they were
torn apart by
massive explosive charges? BTW, it's believed that the charges were set off
just as the floor
above was just about to hit
"D. Mindock" wrote:
Mike,You
are overlooking that Building 7, not hit by any plane, collapsed in the
same controlled manner as the towers.
OK, I will have to read up on building 7.
Also the
momentum energy of the planes would've been spread over a couple hundred
feet. The stoppage wasnot
And the towers were designed for impact by large aircraft.
I read an interview with the architect - he said the buildings were
designed to withstand a hot from the planes of the time the towers were
built; these planes were smaller and carried
less fuel. In typical list fashion, I don't
Doug
- Original Message -
From:
MARIA BURGER
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 12:10
AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] BYU professor's
group accuses U.S. officials of lyingabout 9/11
I'm certainly no "expert" either,
Tom,
I am not taking a position one way or the other on the BYU professor's
accusations, but here are just a few thoughts regarding the comments
below on the maximum temperature of the fire, and steel strength or
melting steel:
I was recently reading about some new infrared camera fire safety
Mike,
It is the same process that you have to deal with to get efficient
stoves. It is actually three steps, the material, the coal and the
gases and they have different burn temperatures, with the gases the
highest. If all is burned, a wood stove will reach 70-80% efficiency,
instead of
