0 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel and the Petroleum Industry
> Thomas Kelly wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> He was clearly advocating 2%, 5% blends. Why? Is it simply because
>> the auto manufacturers will void warrantees at higher blends? If so, why
>> not just say so.
Thomas Kelly wrote:
[snip]
> He was clearly advocating 2%, 5% blends. Why? Is it simply because
> the auto manufacturers will void warrantees at higher blends? If so, why
> not just say so.
Not the auto manufacturers. Bosch, the largest manufacturer of diesel
injection equipment. Bosch
The argument that you will hear for justifying the profit taking off blends is that they have to hold different inventories. Nonsense. The stuff is blended at the nozzle. Reset the mixer and pump a different tanker compartment with a different blend than the last one that was filled. Reset it for t
or should I plan on making my own forever?
> I continue to write to my elected representatives and appreciate your
>help in understanding the economics of BD from a commercial production view.
>Additions/corrections are always appreciated.
>Thanks again,
>
a commercial production view.
Additions/corrections are always appreciated.
Thanks again,
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Appal Energy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel
area?"
I was uneasy with the BD presentation when I left the biofuels forum .
Finding out that the presenter was linked to petro-oil, hasn't helped.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Street" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think you said it Tom;
The money. With all those years in the petroleum industry could he still
be benefiting from that industry somehow? Possible? Running 5 or 10% BD
means still selling 90 to 95% of the petroleum..
Joe
Thomas Kelly wrote:
Snip
> Somehow I know I should be follo
that 2% or 5% blends, of low quality
BD, will not cause harm to engines.
Tom
- Original Message -
From:
Bob Molloy
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:09
PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel and
the
anks,
> Tom
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Appal Energy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:43 PM
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel and the Petroleum Industry
>
>
>
>
>>T
Bob Molloy
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:09
PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel and the
Petroleum Industry
Hi Thomas,
You may have missed this item posted recently. It concerned a New Zealand
company formed to
From:
Thomas
Kelly
To: biofuel
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 11:53
PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Biodiesel and the
Petroleum Industry
I attended a public
forum on Biofuels a while back. One of the speakers, the head of a
biodiesel co-op, had me perplexed by his repeated
Could you explain these two points?
Thanks,
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Appal Energy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel and th
Thomas,
Why? You asked...
1) There's greater profit in blending biodiesel rather than selling
straight.
2) Scrap all the misinformation about engine problems at higher blends.
3) Also scrap his misinformation about emissions benefits tapering off
at 10%. They actually do little until after B
In my opinion, that until the petroleum industry finds a way for them to regulate (control) biodiesel, they will use all at their disposal to keep the general public in the dark about the whole truth.Thomas Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I attended a public forum on Biofuels a while b
I attended a public forum
on Biofuels a while back. One of the speakers, the head of a biodiesel
co-op, had me perplexed by his repeated assertion that biodiesel can be
used in 2, 5%, " even 10% or 20% blends", but above these levels
engine problems and gelling can occur. He had graphs
15 matches
Mail list logo
