To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hello Craig
H... while DU may be dangerous, this article doesn't help much with the
way it's written - poor use of statistics, no references to support its
claims
@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hello Craig
H... while DU may be dangerous, this article doesn't help much with the
way it's written - poor use of statistics, no references to support its
claims.
Not so
and support it.
Cheers
Craig
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: 22 May 2008 08:10 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hello
Kirk McLoren wrote:
doing on the quiet gets my vote. If you live near a reactor you need your own
detection gear.
That also includes people fabbing batteries for space (plutonium
thermopiles). I guarantee
mum is the word as liability is huge.
Kirk
To me, this is really
! All over now.
Best
Keith
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Craig Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thu, 22 May 2008 1:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military
Worse Than Nuclear Weapons
If you say so
is presented in
the headline.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: 21 May 2008 07:16 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hello
: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hello Craig
H... while DU may be dangerous, this article doesn't help much with the
way it's written - poor use of statistics, no references to support its
claims.
Not so, there are plenty of references
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chip Mefford
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:32 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Chip Mefford wrote:
Craig Barrett wrote:
H... while DU
out to me is most welcome.
Cheers
Craig
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: 22 May 2008 01:20 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: 22 May 2008 01:20 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Craig
I didn't defend the article, all I
: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Chip Mefford wrote:
Craig Barrett wrote:
H... while DU may be dangerous, this article doesn't help much with
the
way it's written - poor use of statistics, no references to support its
claims. It's
Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Chip Mefford wrote:
Craig Barrett wrote:
H... while DU may be dangerous, this article doesn't help much with
the
way it's written - poor use of statistics, no references to support its
claims. It's exactly this kind of shoddy
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Chip Mefford wrote:
Craig Barrett wrote:
H... while DU may be dangerous, this article doesn't help much with
the
way it's written - poor use
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: 22 May 2008 08:10 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hello Craig
If you say so. :-)
snip
an argument and support it.
Cheers
Craig
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: 22 May 2008 08:10 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hello
22, 2008 2:10 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse
Than Nuclear Weapons
Hi Andy
I wonder what happened to the US plans to recycle radioactive nuclear
wastes into common household appliances like kitchen cutlery and
babies
Apparently my mail server stumbled...
I've never had a Ford of any sort.
:-) You demonstrate your ignorance. From the useless list archives:
No, I think I'd know if I'd ever owned a Ford, so no ignorance there. What
I did was ignore your argumentum ad hominem (gotta love that latin) much as
Sigh... Sad stuff. That's quite some act of snipping though, LOL! And
the relevance of the Ford Pinto remains undiscovered, like everything
else. Well, nothing else for it...
PLONK
Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
KYOTO Pref., Japan
http://journeytoforever.org/
Biofuel list owner
Apparently
Society: Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear
Weapons
http://www.naturalnews.com/023274.html
(NaturalNews) The use of depleted uranium (DU) munitions by the U.S. military
may lead to a death toll far higher than that from the nuclear bombs dropped at
the end
To: biofuel
Subject: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than
Nuclear Weapons
Society: Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear
Weapons
http://www.naturalnews.com/023274.html
(NaturalNews) The use of depleted uranium (DU) munitions
] On Behalf Of
Kirk McLoren
Sent: 21 May 2008 03:49 PM
To: biofuel
Subject: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than
Nuclear Weapons
Society: Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear
Weapons
http://www.naturalnews.com/023274.html
McLoren
Sent: 21 May 2008 03:49 PM
To: biofuel
Subject: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than
Nuclear Weapons
Society: Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear
Weapons
http://www.naturalnews.com/023274.html
(NaturalNews) The use of depleted uranium
Chip Mefford wrote:
Craig Barrett wrote:
H... while DU may be dangerous, this article doesn't help much with the
way it's written - poor use of statistics, no references to support its
claims. It's exactly this kind of shoddy work that causes the raising of
the skeptical eyebrow at those
23 matches
Mail list logo
