Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-08 Thread Chip Mefford
Dawie Coetzee wrote: Elmer, an indoor composting toilet system would interest me very much. Would it be suitable for multi-storey buildings? What would the service-reticulation implications be? Thanks Dawie Coetzee Yeah; Where's the info on the toilet? I must be missing a thread

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-07 Thread Dawie Coetzee
@sustainablelists.org Sent: Tuesday, 6 January, 2009 2:23:14 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor Hello Elmer, welcome snip Elmer, why not send the list the original message you sent me on your ideas for an indoor composting toilet system, that's why I suggested you join the list. It's up to you

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-07 Thread Keith Addison
operate small refrigeration with less work for the families and protect the environment as well. Hm again. It's puzzling that you titled your message Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor, though you replied to a different message (below), which is titled Searching the list archives. If you'd gone

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-06 Thread Hakan Falk
will vary. At any rate the digestion should be able to gnerate the methane required to cook food, supply fertilizer and even operate small refrigeration with less work for the families and protect the environment as well. Hm again. It's puzzling that you titled your message Re: [Biofuel] Technology

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
with less work for the families and protect the environment as well. Hm again. It's puzzling that you titled your message Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor, though you replied to a different message (below), which is titled Searching the list archives. If you'd gone ahead and done

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-06 Thread Chris Burck
Elmer: Keith wrote: I should point out that the higher a country's per-capita advertising expenditure is, the more its citizens are inclined to think that way. . .It's an implanted view. . .what Prof. Chomsky would call the manufacturing of consent. Keith makes an excellent point. In addition

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-05 Thread Keith Addison
with less work for the families and protect the environment as well. Hm again. It's puzzling that you titled your message Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor, though you replied to a different message (below), which is titled Searching the list archives. If you'd gone ahead and done

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-05 Thread Elmer Stenger
be able to gnerate the methane required to cook food, supply fertilizer and even operate small refrigeration  with less work for the families and protect the environment as well. Hm again. It's puzzling that you titled your message Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor, though you replied

Re: [Biofuel] Technology and the poor

2009-01-04 Thread Elmer Stenger
Keith: A comment on the 2009/01/03 Sat AM11:45 EST posting I agree completly, with the premise expressed, that technology as envisioned by the enlightened societies, is not what the poor need to pull themselves out of their predicament. They need help that they understand and can