Re: [Biofuel] The American Chemistry Council on Chemical Body Burden

2007-01-11 Thread doug swanson
I would expect that with a scientific study, mice, rats and monkeys will be subjected to individual chemicals, and comparisons between their body mass and the dosage of chemical will lead to a LD (lethal dose) number. We, however, are subjected to a blend of many chemicals, some of which

Re: [Biofuel] The American Chemistry Council on Chemical Body Burden

2007-01-11 Thread D. Mindock
Who knows whether the idea of a threshold is valid. I think in studies of radioactive materials on the human body, sometimes a small exposure is worse than a larger one. And it's known too that there is no safe level of mercury. I'd imagine that the same is true for uranium. Figuring out how a

Re: [Biofuel] The American Chemistry Council on Chemical Body Burden

2007-01-11 Thread Frank Navarrete
I agree -- calling any trace amount harmless is preposterous. On 1/11/07, D. Mindock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who knows whether the idea of a threshold is valid. I think in studies of radioactive materials on the human body, sometimes a small exposure is worse than a larger one. And it's

[Biofuel] The American Chemistry Council on Chemical Body Burden

2007-01-10 Thread Keith Addison
Many studies now confirm that the average human has been invaded by hundreds of industrial poisons, without anyone's informed consent. This is a major human rights violation, but the chemical industry tries to frame it as a health issue, then declare it insignificant. From: