No and now that I read my post back I realise how that inference could
come out of it. My comments were in regard to nanoscale particles which
can pass through cell membranes. The micron sized particles are a
respiratory hazard just as asbesdos or other fine particles can be. I
guess I combin
goodness, gracious great balls o' fire...
Would a moratorium on nanotechnology involve glass beads with diameters of a
"few microns". this
really is large compared to "nanoscale"
Joe Street wrote:
> Hi Mike;
>
> You and I have something in common then. The university I work for has
> just
Hi Mike;
You and I have something in common then. The university I work for has
just launched an undergraduate program called nanotechnology
engineering. Quite the laugh since the engineers are waay behind the
scientists in nanotech, but it was part of an initiative to get status
and therefor
I guess we will all just have a BALL, LOL. OK, I guess it's not really funny
after all.
GOOD Question
I just wrote a published paper late last year on the hazards of NanoTech
particles on just this sort of item.
Mike McGinness
Joe Street wrote:
> Uh huh and what happens when you breathe t
Uh huh and what happens when you breathe them?
Joe
Kirk McLoren wrote:
>
> [0]navalynt writes "New Scientist reports that the Department of Energy
> has filed a patent for [1]hydrogen fuel balls. From the article 'The
> proposed glass microspheres would each be a few millionths of a metre
> (mic
| Hydrogen Fuel Balls from a Gas Pump? || from the quite-a-racket dept. || posted by ScuttleMonkey on Monday May 22, @22:29 (Power) || http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/22/2158216 |+--
