Hi Todd,
These items you have listed below are perhaps the strongest
reasons for the implementation of mobile plants. As such they may not
represent excessive outlay for many farmers in the US but they certainly do
in Asia and lots of other third world countries. Where mobile plants
16, 2001 5:50 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Caveat on Container Plants
> I'm not terribly disappointed with the concept of Container Plants, save
but
> one caveat. Almost all biofuel feedstocks are derivatives of a farmer's
> labors, whether it be the tallow from cattle, oil from seed
> Todd - is this the technology or the application? If owned cooperatively
by
> the farmers, the problem you describe would not occur, correct?
>
> Ed B.
.
Ed,
Caveat on application. Granted, your summation of cooperative ownership is
correct.
This thought though.
If a 1,500 gallon per
Todd - is this the technology or the application? If owned cooperatively by
the farmers, the problem you describe would not occur, correct?
Ed B.
> Subject: [biofuel] Caveat on Container Plants
>
>
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
To unsubscr
I'm not terribly disappointed with the concept of Container Plants, save but
one caveat. Almost all biofuel feedstocks are derivatives of a farmer's
labors, whether it be the tallow from cattle, oil from seed or the waste
oils from a fish and chips plant.
Yet this profession usually has the lowes
