At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action, just as
soon
as they got around to
At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action,
just as soon
as they got around to
x-charset ISO-8859-1At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action,
just as soon
as
At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action,
just as soon
as they got around to
x-charset ISO-8859-1At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action,
just as soon
as
x-charset ISO-8859-1At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action,
just as soon
as
At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action,
just as soon
as they got around to
x-charset ISO-8859-1At 06:37 PM 2/22/04 -0600, you wrote:
Walt,
The problem that I have with you analogies is that they do not include the
UN. They had involvement. They were dealing with the situation.
I have no doubt that the UN would have taken decisive action,
just as soon
as
International diplomacy is a game of high stakes poker played with
billion
dollar chips and stacks of human lives.
Saddam really enjoyed the prestige that came with playing in the high
stakes game, and did everything he could to make the world think that he
still had WMD, in
Hey Walt,
Your analogy was only partially correct. He held a fake gun and the judge
said that the cop would shoot unless he proved it was a fake gun. He began
to show that he had no bullets and the cop shot him anyway.
Don't forget that there were inspectors allowed back into Iraq before
At 12:24 PM 2/22/04 -0600, fred wrote:
Hey Walt,
Your analogy was only partially correct. He held a fake gun and the judge
said that the cop would shoot unless he proved it was a fake gun. He began
to show that he had no bullets and the cop shot him anyway.
Not true. The cop knew
11 matches
Mail list logo
