http://www.wilderness.org/NewsRoom/WildfireWatch/20030522.cfm
Wildfire Watch
Bosworth Makes False Claim
Protecting Communities from Wildland Fires is NOT a Forest Service Priority
Wilderness Watch ** Volume 1 (May 22, 2003) - In an interview on Wednesday,
find it again and get the information to
you.
My apologies
Mak Kaufman
-Original Message-
From: kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 4:37 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Actually I think I may have been misinterpreted
25, 2003 4:37 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Actually I think I may have been misinterpreted. The topsoil was not
cooked.
It was gone. The clay subsoil was glazed. This was in Idaho. When will
this
support life again? Time will tell but my guess is a very very
- Original Message -
From: Mark Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 21:17
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Greg, Keith, and Kirk
I am extremely sorry for my tirade!! And both of you are correct I
haven't read the archives
]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:28 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Hello again Greg
Hello Greg
Keith,
should over growen forest, be thined?
I don't think there's any disagreement about that.
If so, what should be done with the wood from the thinning
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 02:25
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Greg and Keith
I have to disagree with the idea that all of the forests need to be
maintained using the idea of stewardship that you are espousing.
My background for 10 of the past 15 years has been studying aquatic
I thought that I did make a comment on the subject, but, perhaps I was
agreeing with what was said about it.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 16:00
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
sound
has been snorting paint thinner.
Kirk
-Original Message-
From: Greg and April [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 3:37 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
I thought that I did make a comment on the subject, but, perhaps I was
agreeing
million years or so, without the so-called help from
Big-Timber.
Mak
-Original Message-
From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 1:32 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Hello Greg
Keith,
should over growen
, May 23, 2003 1:22 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
The idea that let's cut down all of the forest to protect the forest
from itself is BS and the timber industry may have Greg and others
convinced that is the thing to do, but everyone must remember
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:27
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Well, not only that, but if it's not done that way, if local
communities aren't involved in the process (the WHOLE process
Hello again Greg
Hello Greg
Keith,
should over growen forest, be thined?
I don't think there's any disagreement about that.
If so, what should be done with the wood from the thinning?
You're putting the cart before the horse Greg - you're not going to
demonstrate that therefore
Keith,
should over growen forest, be thined? If so, what should be done with the
wood from the thinning?
Greg H.
---Original Message---
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05/21/03 02:29 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
wearing, allowing Big Timber to take
whatever they want regardless is the wolf underneath.
Keith
Greg H.
---Original Message---
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05/21/03 02:29 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
a target=_blank
href=http
---Original Message---
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05/22/03 08:32 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
Hello Greg
Keith,
should over growen forest, be thined?
I don't think there's any disagreement about that.
If so
Big Timber, Big Govt, Big Oil.
Playing on the same country club greens.
Reserving spaces on the same table at the fine dining restaurant
Laughing noisily at the same table at the same bar, at the same parties.
Board of Directors of the same Companies.
Sleeping together in the same bed.
Sigh
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
I forgot to comment that if they don't get going, and the 40 million acres
most at risk burns, before they get started, there won't be much
environment
left to study.
Greg H.
a target=_blank
href=http://www.alternet.org/story.html
or restricting access to the courts, as is the
case with the President's bill.
---Original Message---
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05/20/03 03:35 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
I forgot to comment that if they don't get going
, 2003 15:52
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
From: Greg and April [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue May 20, 2003 0:24am
Subject:
Fire Mitigation
AP
U.S. House Republicans and the Bush administration are moving this
week toward speeding up projects to reduce the fire threat on
millions
WorkingforChange's Action Page.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 15:52
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation
From: Greg and April [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue May 20, 2003 0:24am
Subject:
Fire
From: Greg and April [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue May 20, 2003 0:24am
Subject:
Fire Mitigation
AP
U.S. House Republicans and the Bush administration are moving this
week toward speeding up projects to reduce the fire threat on
millions of federal acres.
Environmentalists and the
21 matches
Mail list logo
