I think Pimentel is not important here, and I did not have him in mind. To my
mind what is important is the next tier of researchers who claim that while
biofuels may contain added energy, the net gain is not large. I don't have
anyone specific in mind, except the recent Berkeley group's
MM,
What we are talking about is not biofuels in general, it is Ethanol
production from corn, as I understand it.
Hakan
At 09:38 AM 6/28/2003 -0700, you wrote:
I think Pimentel is not important here, and I did not have him in
mind. To my
mind what is important is the next tier of
MM,
At 12:25 PM 6/27/2003 -0700, you wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:14:16 +0200, you wrote:
MM,
I think that it is pretty accepted, some proof would for sure be volcanos
and hot springs. I agree with you and many others, that manipulations
with the worlds crust, could result in unwanted
Despite the scientists' claims that I've seen that biomass production uses too
much energy to be an effective contributor to an energy mix, and that if this
energy use is in fossil fuels that the renewable gain is negligible or
non-existent, I tend to not believe these claims.
The fact is that
