Re: OT posts,was: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-25 Thread skaar
yes, you do make sense, but i figured it wouldn't go as far as it did, however if we show ourselves as humourless mad cows for diesel we're gonna chase off newbies anyway. i'll try to label my responses ot in the future. jerry dycus wrote: > Hi Todd and All, > I have to go with Todd o

Re: OT posts,was: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-25 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Jerry >Hi Todd and All, > I have to go with Todd on this one. I'm about to >have to choose between staying with biofuel and the >gasifacation list I need to join. If the OT, political >on this list stays as bad as it's been I'll have no >choice. > I believe it hurts the biofuel

Re: OT posts,was: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread Steve Spence
I'm with you. with all the lists I read, and email I get, I'm over 500 messages daily. Let's stay on topic as much as we can. >From: jerry dycus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com >To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com >Subject: OT posts,was: [bi

Re: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread Keith Addison
>Sorry if I appear to be the proverbial wet blanket, but has anyone noticed >several unsubscription requests lately referring to excessive correspondence >which they are unable to plow through, as well as "off topic" material? > >Would it be entirely out of line to suggest that we seriously attemp

OT posts,was: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread jerry dycus
From: Appal Energy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:12 AM > To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty > > > Sorry if I appear to be the proverbial wet blanket, > but has anyone noticed > several unsubscription re

Re: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread skaar
different personal situations, but feelings summed up well. David Reid wrote: > Todd, > Thanks for the timely reminder but as someone who tends to be > > serious by nature and takes myself too seriously at times, I need to > escape > from my seriousness occasionaly, step outside my huma

Re: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread David Reid
nd concern.. B.r., David - Original Message - From: Appal Energy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:11 PM Subject: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty > Sorry if I appear to be the proverbial wet blanket, but has anyone noticed > several unsubscr

RE: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread Mike Brownstone
: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty Sorry if I appear to be the proverbial wet blanket, but has anyone noticed several unsubscription requests lately referring to excessive correspondence which they are unable to plow through, as well as "off topic" material?

Re: [biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread skaar
maybe another group, biofuelsOT. Appal Energy wrote: > Sorry if I appear to be the proverbial wet blanket, but has anyone > noticed > several unsubscription requests lately referring to excessive > correspondence > which they are unable to plow through, as well as "off topic" > material? > > Wou

[biofuel] Wet Blanket was Sea shanty

2001-04-24 Thread Appal Energy
Sorry if I appear to be the proverbial wet blanket, but has anyone noticed several unsubscription requests lately referring to excessive correspondence which they are unable to plow through, as well as "off topic" material? Would it be entirely out of line to suggest that we seriously attempt to