PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Just make sure your draft beer hasn't had the yeast filtered
out of it
and you'll be just fine. :-)
Appal Energy wrote:
What is easy is harming one's health by trying.
I suppose that's why I'm getting older by the day
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Well Chris,
I'll tell ya' this. All that beneficial meat processing bacteria
is certainly not doing its job as efficiently as one would be led
to believe, considering the several pounds of undigested meat
found in the lower intestinal
: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:21 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Well Chris,
I'll tell ya' this. All that beneficial meat processing bacteria
is certainly not doing its job as efficiently as one would be led
to believe, considering
Todd,
I'm really not saying highly meat centered diet... I've been through
the
diet gamut, vegetarianism, veganism, raw-foodism, brief flirtation with
fruitarianism, for lots of years (20), . I am worried about the B-12 issue
which seems to be directly related to the ammount of animal food
that they can't survive without their
Prozac.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Witmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Some people are able to thrive
I'm afraid I have pretty much used all my ammunition on this. I'm not
totally convinced myself, frankly. It sounds interesting and plausible,
but if the paucity of information on the web is any indicator (and it
probably is), this is either an area that needs a lot more research, or
zero
9:21 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Well Chris,
I'll tell ya' this. All that beneficial meat processing bacteria
is certainly not doing its job as efficiently as one would be led
to believe, considering the several pounds of undigested
I'm afraid I have pretty much used all my ammunition on this. I'm not
totally convinced myself, frankly. It sounds interesting and plausible,
but if the paucity of information on the web is any indicator (and it
probably is), this is either an area that needs a lot more research, or
zero
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Some people are able to thrive on diets containing such
extremely low
levels of animal protein that most Westerners would starve to
death on
them. The people that thrive have different intestinal bacteria
than
meat-eating
: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Ken,
I don't see any reference within the body of text that you site
which supports any belief that a highly meat centered diet
(Western diet) is necessary for human health.
In fact, note was made that the levels of DHA and EPA
Keith's words below are very much in keeping with The Milk Book by
William Campbell Douglass, MD:
http://www.westonaprice.org/book_reviews/milk_book.html
That book was a real eye-opener for me when I first read it several
years ago! However, I'm sure most of it won't come as a surprise to
Hello Hakan
Keith,
Thank you for a very good piece on the food question. As usual, you
hit a lot of nails. I do want to add a couple of things and questions,
- During the last 200 years, the average life span for the human
have gone from 35 years to around 80 years in the industrialized
When you eat something and you get mucus, and you can tell because you are
now clearing your throat and have enhanced drainage, why do you eat it
again? Mucus is the reaction to an irritant.
Seems many are oblivious to their body. How can a mucus producing substance
be rationalized as healthy?
At 10:25 PM 8/16/2002 +0900, you wrote:
Hello Hakan
Keith,
Thank you for a very good piece on the food question. As usual, you
hit a lot of nails. I do want to add a couple of things and questions,
- During the last 200 years, the average life span for the human
have gone from 35
AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
At 10:25 PM 8/16/2002 +0900, you wrote:
Hello Hakan
Keith,
Thank you for a very good piece on the food question. As usual, you
hit a lot of nails. I do want to add a couple of things and questions
The end of the human race will be that we eventually die of
civilization.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
- Original Message -
From: kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
[snip
] Which is better for the environment?
It seems sometimes, that each group of environmentalists has
their own
agenda and that trying to make a selection amongst the choices
is very
difficult.
For example: In doing heavy duty cleaning, such as cleaning my
butcher
shop; Is it better
Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Kim,
CBA.Cost Benefit Analysiswith costs other than
economic
being the motivator
.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Kim,
CBA.Cost Benefit Analysiswith costs other than
economic
http://www.beyondveg.com/
More on that, and believe me I've tried...
Ken
Not everyone can stay healthy on a vegan diet. While I don't eat a lot
of meat, I do require a 6 ounce serving, five times a week. Even the
doctors that pushed the vegan diet have come to recognize this fact. I
]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Kim,
CBA.Cost Benefit Analysiswith costs other than
economic
being the motivator.
Can you heat your water with renewable resources (animal fat,
veg
oil
meat centered diet.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: Kim Garth Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
I am talking about my personal butcher shop. I also use
- Original Message -
From: Kim Garth Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 07:49
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Besides, my husband and I don't create enough manure to revitalize 20
acres, we need the help
]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:01
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Thanks for the information. I generally brain tan the skins, but using
the rest I had not thought of, other than to feed the buzzards, that is.
Bright Blessings,
Kim
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 07:49
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Besides, my husband and I don't create enough manure to revitalize 20
acres, we need the help of our animals.
Actualy you still may be in good condition to better the soil, on your
Keith wrote:
There have been several studies that found that grassland and pasture
hold more carbon than forests do. I think it depends on the pasture,
and on the forest, but there's probably not a big difference either
way.
MH wrote:
I've heard of similar studies suggesting root growth
Some people are able to thrive on diets containing such extremely low
levels of animal protein that most Westerners would starve to death on
them. The people that thrive have different intestinal bacteria than
meat-eating Westerners; the bacteria digest the vegetable matter and
then the
Check out this:
http://www.beyondveg.com/cat/topics/index.shtml
Ken
- Original Message -
From: Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
OkayI may be gullible
that they can't survive without their
Prozac.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Witmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Some people are able
for the environment?
Check out this:
http://www.beyondveg.com/cat/topics/index.shtml
Ken
- Original Message -
From: Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Okay
: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Todd,
In a rare twist, it is a lot easier to find information on this
in
Japanese Internet than in English; this may be due to Japanese
researchers' language limitations.
Japanese-only link at Chiba University:
http://photo-m.tp.chiba
Just make sure your draft beer hasn't had the yeast filtered out of it
and you'll be just fine. :-)
Appal Energy wrote:
What is easy is harming one's health by trying.
I suppose that's why I'm getting older by the day.If I
had only visited the meat counter with greater frequency
]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Todd,
I'm really not saying highly meat centered diet... I've
been through
the
diet gamut, vegetarianism, veganism, raw-foodism, brief
flirtation with
fruitarianism
: Re: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
Just make sure your draft beer hasn't had the yeast filtered
out of it
and you'll be just fine. :-)
Appal Energy wrote:
What is easy is harming one's health by trying.
I suppose that's why I'm getting older by the day.If
I
had
Kim writes:
Is anyone else interested in this kind of debate?
Definitely! Is this the right place?
Is it better to use the chemicals and the bleach or the steam
cleaners? I know chlorine is feminizing the environment
and is real bad for a septic system [my grey water] and I
imagine the rest
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:06 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Which is better for the environment?
It seems sometimes, that each group of environmentalists has
their own
agenda and that trying to make a selection amongst the choices
is very
difficult.
For example: In doing heavy duty
36 matches
Mail list logo
