[Biofuel] New Nukes Not Ready for Prime Time - Harvey Wasserman - CounterPunch

2008-07-25 Thread Darryl McMahon
This was sent to me today, and I thought it worth sharing.

Story Leader: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Deals Devastating Blow to 
Nuclear Power Industry

A devastating blow to the much-hyped revival of atomic power has been 
delivered by an unlikely source---the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The 
NRC says the standardized designs on which the entire premise of 
returning nuclear power to center stage is based have massive holes in 
them, and may not be ready for approval for years to come.

Whole article at:
http://www.counterpunch.org/wasserman07252008.html

In Canada, the MAPLE reactors have also hit a wall.

http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/news/story.html?id=ef7e01a6-ae8b-44b9-ba36-b720d8d53698

The news on most other new generation reactors, e.g., PBMR (Pebble Bed 
Modular Reactors) isn't encouraging either.

In the meantime, the Ontario provincial government has approved the 
construction of eight new reactors at Darlington, although they don't 
know which type will be built and have no firm idea of how much they 
will cost.

-- 
Darryl McMahon
Save water and your money.  The Water Saver toilet fill diverter.
http://www.econogics.com/WaterSaver/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Titration Vs Bracket Method

2008-07-25 Thread Keith Addison
Brian

Is this still the same oil you were asking about three months ago?

From: Brian Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 10:35:43 -0400
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Titration

Hi All,
Have a quick question about titration.
I have obtained some waste oil that seems to be titrating at 12 - 
15mL.  I have done this numerous times and come up with about the
same results. ...

You said then that you'd find a new source of better oil, but early 
this month you asked the same question again:

From: Brian Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:03:28 -0400
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Waste Oil Problems

Hi all,
I have a source of waste oil that will provide about 20 gal of oil
per week.  They are using soy oil and the virgin form of it produces 
very good fuel.  They say that they change the oil once per week.
The problem is that the used oil titrates at 12 to 15 mL. ...

And now again, on 24 July, you ask just the same question:

I have titrated some sample oil I have received and it titrates high 
like 12 - 14 ml.  So I thought I would do the bracket method and see 
if that would give any different results so I would know if my 
titration is off.

What gives? Are these different sources of oil or still the same source?

And what stage are you at, exactly? Are you still a novice? It sure 
sounds like it since you're so unsure of your titration. There's no 
problem with titration.

Can you make one-litre test batches with new oil that reliably pass 
the quality tests?

Wash test
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_vehicle.html#washtst
Methanol test
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_vehicle.html#methtest

Can you make one-litre test batches with used oil that reliably pass 
the quality tests?

You say you keep checking JtF but you can't find the answer, but 
I'm wondering how much notice you take of the answers you can find.

For instance, it says NOTE: Novices should avoid poor-quality oil 
like this for their first test-batches with used oil. Find a source 
of oil that titrates at 2 to 2.5 ml of 0.1% NaOH solution, not more 
than 3 ml. Leave overcooked oils with high titration levels for later 
when you have more experience. Again, make small one-litre test 
batches before attempting larger batches of WVO.

It says it again and again: avoid high-FFA oils, especially if you're a novice.

So why, at this stage, after less than four months' experience, are 
you STILL trying to use oil that titrates at 12-14 ml?

And why can't you do a more accurate titration than that? The higher 
the FFA level, the more accurate the measurements need to be, it says 
that too. It also says you'd be lucky to get more than 50% production 
out of oil like that, unless you deacidify it or, better, use the 
acid-base method, but it's obvious you're not ready for the two-stage 
processes.

So what gives?

Best

Keith


I have titrated some sample oil I have received and it titrates high 
like 12 - 14 ml.  So I thought I would do the bracket method and see 
if that would give any different results so I would know if my 
titration is off.
I did the bracket test just like the directions on the website said 
to do from 5 to 7.5 g/mL.  All of the samples looked almost exactly 
the same except for the 7.5 which turned to a solid after the first 
shake.
Does anyone have any clues as to what is going on?  Because I thought 
when it turned solid that indicated too much lye.  So I tried a 
sample batch with 6.5 g/mL.  It turned out weird.  There are three 
layers, a kinda semi-solid layer, a dark liquid layer, and a light/
clear layer at the top.  But there are also little clumps of white 
looking junk floating around everywhere in all layers almost like a 
crystal forming.
I could really use some help on figuring out what is going on and get 
your all expert opinions.

Thanks
Brian Schneider


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/