Re: [Biofuel] automating titration

2006-03-16 Thread Jason Katie
i thank you for your help Mr. Mahoney.

the known variables will be:

pH of the base (by reference measurement)
pH of the Oil (by measurement)
volume of the oil (by external input)

the unknown will be:

volume of base needed to reach a pH of 8.4

i dont really need numbers, just a formula that i can put into a program,
the knowns will all be taken from the test sequence and the unknown will be
found and used in the process plus a small excess.
i have no background in chemistry, so this is all very new to me, and im
probably in over my head, but i will try whatever i can to make this work.

P.S. i tried to send this to your email address and it didnt accept it, i 
may have entered it incorrectly.

thank you,
Jason


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Drain America First

2006-03-16 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/03/10/drain_america_first.php

Drain America First

Joseph E. Stiglitz

March 10, 2006

Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, is Professor of 
Economics at Columbia University and was Chairman of the Council of 
Economic Advisers to President Clinton and Chief Economist and Senior 
Vice President at the World Bank.

One of the more surreal sessions at this year's World Economic Forum 
in Davos had oil industry experts explaining how the melting of the 
polar ice cap-which is occurring faster than anyone 
anticipated-represents not only a problem, but also an opportunity: 
vast amounts of oil may now be accessible.

Similarly, these experts concede that the fact that the United States 
has not signed the Law of the Sea, the international convention 
determining who has access to offshore oil and other maritime mineral 
rights, presents a risk of international conflict. But they also 
point to the upside: the oil industry, in its never-ending search for 
more reserves, need not beg Congress for the right to despoil Alaska.

President George W. Bush has an uncanny ability not to see the big 
message. For years, it has become increasingly clear that much is 
amiss with his energy policy. Scripted by the oil industry, even 
members of his own party referred to an earlier energy bill as one 
that left no lobbyist behind. While praising the virtues of the 
free market, Bush has been only too willing to give huge handouts to 
the energy industry, even as the country faces soaring deficits.

There is a market failure when it comes to energy, but government 
intervention should run in precisely the opposite direction from what 
the Bush administration has proposed. The fact that Americans do not 
pay the full price for the pollution-especially enormous 
contributions to greenhouse gases-that results from their profligate 
energy use means that energy is under-priced, in turn sustaining 
excessive consumption.

The government needs to encourage conservation, and intervening in 
the price system-namely, through taxes on energy-is an efficient way 
to do it. But, rather than encouraging conservation, Bush has pursued 
a policy of drain America first, leaving America more dependent on 
external oil in the future. Never mind that high demand drives up oil 
prices, creating a windfall for many in the Middle East who are not 
among America's friends.

Now, more than four years after the terrorist attacks of September 
2001, Bush appears to have finally woken up to the reality of 
America's increasing dependence; with soaring oil prices, it was hard 
for him not to note the consequences. But, again, his 
administration's faltering moves will almost surely make matters 
worse in the immediate future. Bush still refuses to do anything 
about conservation, and he has put very little money behind his 
continuing prayer than technology will save us.

What, then, to make of Bush's recent declaration of a commitment to 
make America 75% free of dependence on Middle East oil within 25 
years? For investors, the message is clear: do not invest more in 
developing reserves in the Middle East, which is by far the 
lowest-cost source of oil in the world.

But without new investment in developing Middle East reserves, 
unbridled growth of energy consumption in the U.S., China and 
elsewhere implies that demand will outpace supply. If that were not 
enough, Bush's threat of sanctions against Iran poses the risks of 
interruptions of supplies from one of the world's largest producers.

With world oil production close to full capacity and prices already 
more than double their pre-Iraq War level, this portends still higher 
prices, and still higher profits for the oil industry-the only clear 
winner in Bush's Middle East policy.

To be sure, one shouldn't begrudge Bush for having at last recognized 
that there is a problem. But, as always, a closer look at what he is 
proposing suggests another sleight of hand by his administration. 
Aside from refusing to recognize the importance of global warming, 
encourage conservation, or devote enough funds to research to make a 
real difference, Bush's grandiose promise of a reduction of 
dependence on Middle East oil means less than it appears. With only 
20 percent of US oil coming from the Middle East, his goal could be 
achieved by a modest shift of sourcing elsewhere.

But surely, one would think, the Bush administration must realize 
that oil trades on a global market. Even if America were 100 
percent independent of Middle East oil, a reduction in supply of 
Middle East oil could have devastating effects on the world price-and 
on the American economy.

As is too often the case with the Bush administration, there is no 
flattering explanation of official policy. Is Bush playing politics 
by pandering to anti-Arab and anti-Iranian sentiment in America? Or 
is this just another example of incompetence and muddle? From what we 
have seen over 

[Biofuel] Ownership Matters: Three Steps to Ensure a Biofuels Industry That Truly Benefits Rural America

2006-03-16 Thread Keith Addison
Ownership Matters: Three Steps to Ensure a Biofuels Industry That 
Truly Benefits Rural America

This February 2006 paper by David Morris was adapted from a speech given at
the Minnesota Ag Expo 2006. The paper provides a snapshot of today's
biofuels industry and a roadmap to ensure that local farmers see significant
benefits from the expanding industry in the future.

http://www.newrules.org/agri/ownershipbiofuels.pdf

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Chernobyl: A poisonous legacy

2006-03-16 Thread Keith Addison
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article351153.ece

Chernobyl: A poisonous legacy

Twenty years after a blast in the nuclear plant at Chernobyl spread 
radioactive debris across Europe, it has been revealed that 375 farms 
in Britain, with 200,000 sheep, are still contaminated by fallout

By Andy McSmith

Published: 14 March 2006

After two decades, the legacy of the Chernobyl disaster is still 
casting its poisonous shadow over Britain's countryside. The 
Department of Health has admitted that more than 200,000 sheep are 
grazing on land contaminated by fallout from the explosion at the 
Ukrainian nuclear plant 1,500 miles away. Emergency orders still 
apply to 355 Welsh farms, 11 in Scotland and nine in England as a 
result of the catastrophe in April 1986.

The revelation - in a Commons written answer to the Labour MP Gordon 
Prentice - comes as Mr Blair prepares to make the case for nuclear 
power in a forthcoming government Energy Review. The Prime Minister 
argues that nuclear energy would allow the UK to achieve twin 
objectives of cutting C02 emissions and reducing dependency on 
imported natural gas supplies.

But, just last week a damning report from the Government's own 
advisory board on sustainable development identified five major 
disadvantages to any planned renewal of Britain's nuclear power 
programme, including the threat of terrorist attack and the danger of 
radiation exposure. The longevity of the Chernobyl effect in a 
region generation of nuclear power stations, and going through a 
consultation exercise to try to convince the public that this is a 
safe form of electricity generation, we shouldn't overlook the 
terrible consequences if something does go wrong,

No one would now build a reactor as unsafe as those at Chernobyl, 
which were jerry built. Even so, I think a lot of people will be 
shocked to know that, as we approach the 20th anniversary of 
Chernobyl, hundreds of farming families are still living with the 
fallout.

Jean McSorley, Greenpeace's senior adviser on nuclear energy said: 
Chernobyl was the worst nuclear accident the world has ever seen but 
it is by no means the worst that could happen. In Cumbria, where I 
come from, people who are old enough to remember still talk about it. 
It's quite moving to hear the stress that farming families were put 
through. I think the British public that all this distance from 
Chernobyl, 20 years later, so many families are still living with its 
impact day to day.

The Chernobyl disaster turned public opinion in Britain against civil 
nuclear power overnight. The land still poisoned by Chernobyl's 
radioactivity lies all along the Welsh hills between Bangor and Bala, 
much of it in the Snowdonia National park. There is also a large 
triangle of contaminated land in Cumbria, south of Buttermere - 
though the number of farms affected is smaller than in Wales.

Some of the Scottish hills are also still affected. No sheep can be 
moved out of any of these areas without a special licence, under 
Emergency Orders imposed in 1986. Sheep that have higher than the 
permitted level of radiation have to be marked with a special dye 
that does not wash off in the rain, and have to spend months grazing 
on uncontaminated grass before they are passed as fit to go into the 
food chain.

A National Farmers' Union spokesman said: The paramount concern has 
to be the safety of the consumer, and consumer confidence in the meat 
supply, so exceptional care has to be taken to make sure no 
contaminated meat goes into the food chain.

Most of Britain's nuclear power stations have either ceased to 
produce electricity, or are nearing the end of their active life. The 
last is due for closure in 2035. The Government is now conducting an 
energy review, to be published in June, which is expected to announce 
a new nuclear programme.

Tony Blair signalled his support for the industry in a speech to 
Labour's conference last autumn, when he warned Britain is too 
reliant on unstable regimes for its energy supplies, and singled 
out nuclear power as an alternative.

But resistance to the idea has been growing, particularly with the 
publication last week of the report by the government's Sustainable 
Development Commission. The Commons Environmental Audit Committee 
will also report later this month. According to a committee member, 
their findings are expected to be measured but certainly won't put 
a strong case for nuclear power.

On 23 March, leading specialists will hold a conference in London on 
the long term impact of Chernobyl. At the end of the month, the 
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority will issue a revised figure for the 
cost of cleaning up the sites of disused publicly owned nuclear 
plants.

Their figure is expected to be substantially higher than their 
original estimate which was published last year, of £56bn.

David Ellwood, 49, farmer: 'Nobody can tell us when the radiation will pass'

By Geneviéve Roberts

David Ellwood 

[Biofuel] Climate change 'irreversible' as Arctic sea ice fails to re-form

2006-03-16 Thread Keith Addison
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article351135.ece

Climate change 'irreversible' as Arctic sea ice fails to re-form

By Steve Connor, Science Editor

Published: 14 March 2006

Sea ice in the Arctic has failed to re-form for the second 
consecutive winter, raising fears that global warming may have tipped 
the polar regions in to irreversible climate change far sooner than 
predicted.

Satellite measurements of the area of the Arctic covered by sea ice 
show that for every month this winter, the ice failed to return even 
to its long-term average rate of decline. It is the second 
consecutive winter that the sea ice has not managed to re-form enough 
to compensate for the unprecedented melting seen during the past few 
summers.

Scientists are now convinced that Arctic sea ice is showing signs of 
both a winter and a summer decline that could indicate a major 
acceleration in its long-term rate of disappearance. The greatest 
fear is that an environmental positive feedback has kicked in, 
where global warming melts ice which in itself causes the seas to 
warm still further as more sunlight is absorbed by a dark ocean 
rather than being reflected by white ice.

Mark Serreze, a sea ice specialist at the US National Snow and Ice 
Data Centre in Colorado, said: In September 2005, the Arctic sea ice 
cover was at its lowest extent since satellite monitoring began in 
1979, and probably the lowest in the past 100 years. While we can't 
be certain, it looks like 2006 will be more of the same, Dr Serreze 
said.

Unless conditions turn colder, we may be headed for another year of 
big sea ice losses, rivalling or perhaps even exceeding what we saw 
in September 2005. We are of course monitoring the situation closely 
... Coupled with recent findings from Nasa that the Greenland ice 
sheet may be near a tipping point, it's pretty clear that the Arctic 
is starting to respond to global warming, he added.

Although sea levels are not affected by melting sea ice - which 
floats on the ocean - the Arctic ice cover is thought to be a key 
moderator of the northern hemisphere's climate. It helps to stabilise 
the massive land glaciers and ice sheets of Greenland which have the 
capacity to raise sea levels dramatically.

Dr Serreze said that some parts of the northern hemisphere 
experienced very low temperatures this winter, but the Arctic was 
much warmer than normal. Even in January, when there were actually 
record low temperatures in Alaska and parts of Russia, it was still 
very warm over the Arctic Ocean, he said.

The sea ice cover waxes and wanes with the seasons. It partly melts 
in spring and summer, then grows back in autumn and winter. It has 
not recovered well this past winter - ice extent for every month 
since September 2005 has been far below average. And it's been so 
warm in the Arctic that the ice that has grown this winter is 
probably rather thin, he explained.

Professor Peter Wadhams, of Cambridge University, who was the first 
Briton to monitor Arctic sea ice from nuclear submarines, said: One 
of the big changes this winter is that a large area of the Barents 
Sea has remained ice-free for the first time. This is part of 
Europe's 'back yard'. Climate models did predict a retreat of sea ice 
in the Barents Sea but not for a few decades yet, so it is a sign 
that the changes that were predicted are indeed happening, but much 
faster than predicted.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] automating titration

2006-03-16 Thread Joe Street
Hey Jason;

If you are bent on doing this, why not approach it from a different 
angle?  Make a system that imitates what you do yourself, instead of 
trying to do it numerically just make a system that does what you do.  
It could all be done by way of gravity feed and counting drops by use of 
optical sensors.  You add a few drops of indicator and then keep adding 
titration solution until the indicator goes off and stays for 10 
seconds.  That's 8.4 ph.  Again a photosensor is used to detect the 
colour change condition.
This will for sure work and eliminates much of the problem with trying 
to meter flows.

Joe

Jason  Katie wrote:

Mr. McGinness
i thank you for the advice on the pumps/ flow controls, i hadnt considered 
ready-made equipment (i usually build my own rig) ill have to look into 
that, but my problem does not lie within the realm of mechanics. i need a 
mathematical equation that i can manipulate to find the volume of  base 
needed to bring the acid to a pH of 8.4.

the knowns will be:

pH of the base (by reference measurement)
pH of the Oil (by measurement)
volume of the oil (by external input)

the variable will be:

volume of base needed to reach a pH of 8.4

i have the outline of what i need, i just dont know how to put it together 
and make it work and pH isnt some simple (A+B)/C= your number here 
equation, which is confusing me beyond anything ive ever tried before (im 
horrible at math). 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] The End of Dollar Hegemony

2006-03-16 Thread Keith Addison
See also:

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12346.htm
Global Economic Hegemony: A New Kind of Warfare?
By Kaleem Hussain
03/15/06 ICSSA

The Proposed Iranian Oil Bourse
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg59546.html

Petrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg59538.html

-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11946.htm

The End of Dollar Hegemony

Before the U.S. House of Representatives 02/15/06

By Ron Paul

02/16/06 ICH -- -- A hundred years ago it was called dollar 
diplomacy. After World War II, and especially after the fall of the 
Soviet Union in 1989, that policy evolved into dollar hegemony. But 
after all these many years of great success, our dollar dominance is 
coming to an end.

It has been said, rightly, that he who holds the gold makes the 
rules. In earlier times it was readily accepted that fair and honest 
trade required an exchange for something of real value.

First it was simply barter of goods. Then it was discovered that gold 
held a universal attraction, and was a convenient substitute for more 
cumbersome barter transactions. Not only did gold facilitate exchange 
of goods and services, it served as a store of value for those who 
wanted to save for a rainy day.

Though money developed naturally in the marketplace, as governments 
grew in power they assumed monopoly control over money. Sometimes 
governments succeeded in guaranteeing the quality and purity of gold, 
but in time governments learned to outspend their revenues. New or 
higher taxes always incurred the disapproval of the people, so it 
wasn't long before Kings and Caesars learned how to inflate their 
currencies by reducing the amount of gold in each coin-- always 
hoping their subjects wouldn't discover the fraud. But the people 
always did, and they strenuously objected.

This helped pressure leaders to seek more gold by conquering other 
nations. The people became accustomed to living beyond their means, 
and enjoyed the circuses and bread. Financing extravagances by 
conquering foreign lands seemed a logical alternative to working 
harder and producing more. Besides, conquering nations not only 
brought home gold, they brought home slaves as well. Taxing the 
people in conquered territories also provided an incentive to build 
empires. This system of government worked well for a while, but the 
moral decline of the people led to an unwillingness to produce for 
themselves. There was a limit to the number of countries that could 
be sacked for their wealth, and this always brought empires to an 
end. When gold no longer could be obtained, their military might 
crumbled. In those days those who held the gold truly wrote the rules 
and lived well.

That general rule has held fast throughout the ages. When gold was 
used, and the rules protected honest commerce, productive nations 
thrived. Whenever wealthy nations-- those with powerful armies and 
gold-- strived only for empire and easy fortunes to support welfare 
at home, those nations failed.

Today the principles are the same, but the process is quite 
different. Gold no longer is the currency of the realm; paper is. The 
truth now is: He who prints the money makes the rules-- at least 
for the time being. Although gold is not used, the goals are the 
same: compel foreign countries to produce and subsidize the country 
with military superiority and control over the monetary printing 
presses.

Since printing paper money is nothing short of counterfeiting, the 
issuer of the international currency must always be the country with 
the military might to guarantee control over the system. This 
magnificent scheme seems the perfect system for obtaining perpetual 
wealth for the country that issues the de facto world currency. The 
one problem, however, is that such a system destroys the character of 
the counterfeiting nation's people-- just as was the case when gold 
was the currency and it was obtained by conquering other nations. And 
this destroys the incentive to save and produce, while encouraging 
debt and runaway welfare.

The pressure at home to inflate the currency comes from the corporate 
welfare recipients, as well as those who demand handouts as 
compensation for their needs and perceived injuries by others. In 
both cases personal responsibility for one's actions is rejected.

When paper money is rejected, or when gold runs out, wealth and 
political stability are lost. The country then must go from living 
beyond its means to living beneath its means, until the economic and 
political systems adjust to the new rules-- rules no longer written 
by those who ran the now defunct printing press.

Dollar Diplomacy, a policy instituted by William Howard Taft and 
his Secretary of State Philander C. Knox, was designed to enhance 
U.S. commercial investments in Latin America and the Far East. 
McKinley concocted a war 

Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Greenpeace finds Heinz Baby Rice Cereal contaminated by illegal GE rice

2006-03-16 Thread Jack Schwartz


Keith's post concerning Greenpeace finding Heinz Baby Rice Cereal
contaminated by illegal genetically engineered rice makes me wonder if
the iron and arsenic content of the Heinz Baby Rice Cereal is also being
checked by Greenpeace or others.
-
'Institute of Science In Society' Press Release
September 13, 2004
Rice in Asia: Too Little Iron, Too Much Arsenic
Asians are getting too little iron and too much arsenic from soil and
water. Unfortunately the remedy for one problem may increase the impact
of the other. The challenge is to find a remedy that takes care of both
problems, says Prof. Joe Cummins. [continues]

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/RIATLITMA.php
 -- Jack

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Public Power in the Age of Empire

2006-03-16 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.democracynow.org/static/Arundhati_Trans.shtml
Arundhati Roy:
Transcript of full speech by Arundhati Roy in San Francisco, 
California on August 16th, 2004.
Copyright 2004 Arundhati Roy. For permission to reprint contact [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

TIDE? OR IVORY SNOW?
Public Power in the Age of Empire

I've been asked to speak about Public Power in the Age of Empire. 
I'm not used to doing as I'm told, but by happy coincidence, it's 
exactly what I'd like to speak about tonight.

When language has been butchered and bled of meaning, how do we 
understand public power? When freedom means occupation, when 
democracy means neo-liberal capitalism, when reform means repression, 
when words like empowerment and peacekeeping make your blood run 
cold - why, then, public power could mean whatever you want it to 
mean. A biceps building machine, or a Community Power Shower. So, 
I'll just have to define public power as I go along, in my own 
self-serving sort of way.

In India, the word public is now a Hindi word. It means people. In 
Hindi, we have sarkar and public, the government and the people. 
Inherent in this use is the underlying assumption that the government 
is quite separate from the people. This distinction has to do with 
the fact that India's freedom struggle, though magnificent, was by no 
means revolutionary. The Indian elite stepped easily and elegantly 
into the shoes of the British imperialists. A deeply impoverished, 
essentially feudal society became a modern, independent nation state. 
Even today, fifty seven years on to the day, the truly vanquished 
still look upon the government as mai-baap, the parent and provider. 
The somewhat more radical, those who still have fire in their 
bellies, see it as chor, the thief, the snatcher-away of all things.

Either way, for most Indians, sarkar is very separate from public. 
However, as you make your way up India's social ladder, the 
distinction between sarkar and public gets blurred. The Indian elite, 
like the elite anywhere in the world, finds it hard to separate 
itself from the state. It sees like the state, it thinks like the 
state, it speaks like the state.

In the United States, on the other hand, the blurring of the 
distinction between sarkar and public has penetrated far deeper into 
society. This could be a sign of a robust democracy, but 
unfortunately, it's a little more complicated and less pretty than 
that. Among other things, it has to do with the elaborate web of 
paranoia generated by the U.S. sarkar and spun out by the corporate 
media and Hollywood. Ordinary Americans have been manipulated into 
imagining they are a people under siege whose sole refuge and 
protector is their government. If it isn't the Communists, it's 
al-Qaeda. If it isn't Cuba. it's Nicaragua. As a result, this, the 
most powerful nation in the world - with its unmatchable arsenal of 
weapons, its history of having waged and sponsored endless wars, and 
the only nation in history to have actually used nuclear bombs - is 
peopled by a terrified citizenry, jumping at shadows. A people bonded 
to the state not by social services, or public health care, or 
employment guarantees, but by fear.

This synthetically manufactured fear is used to gain public sanction 
for further acts of aggression. And so it goes, building into a 
spiral of self-fulfilling hysteria, now formally calibrated by the 
U.S government's Amazing Technicolored Terror Alerts: fuchsia, 
turquoise, salmon pink.

To outside observers, this merging of sarkar and public in the United 
States sometimes makes it hard to separate the actions of the U.S. 
government from the American people. It is this confusion that fuels 
anti-Americanism in the world. Anti-Americanism is then seized upon 
and amplified by the U.S. government and its faithful media outlets. 
You know the routine: Why do they hate us? They hate our freedoms . 
. . etc. . . . etc. This enhances the sense of isolation among 
American people and makes the embrace between sarkar and public even 
more intimate. Like Red Riding Hood looking for a cuddle in the 
wolf's bed.

Using the threat of an external enemy to rally people behind you is a 
tired old horse, which politicians have ridden into power for 
centuries. But could it be that ordinary people are fed up of that 
poor old horse and are looking for something different? There's an 
old Hindi film song that goes yeh public hai, yeh sab jaanti hai (the 
public, she knows it all). Wouldn't it be lovely if the song were 
right and the politicians wrong?

Before Washington's illegal invasion of Iraq, a Gallup International 
poll showed that in no European country was the support for a 
unilateral war higher than 11 percent. On February 15, 2003, weeks 
before the invasion, more than ten million people marched against the 
war on different continents, including North America. And yet the 
governments of many supposedly democratic countries still went to war.

The question is: is 

Re: [Biofuel] The End of Dollar Hegemony

2006-03-16 Thread DHAJOGLO
I liked this essay (well, actually it depressed me).  The end made me think of 
something, ...gold or its equivalent. Isn't oil the equivalent currency?  I 
mean, we price it in euros or dollars but in fact, it is so central to the 
world economy that pricing it in gold does not change the dynamic.  I would 
postulate that oil is the world currency and will continue to be so until its 
sufficiently depleted.  Just a thought :)

---

We will know that day is
approaching when oil-producing countries demand gold, or its
equivalent, for their oil rather than dollars or Euros. The sooner
the better.




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] automating titration

2006-03-16 Thread logan vilas
The same could be done with a ph meter with external alarm. Put a relay 
inline to a solenoid valve when it hits the right ph the solenoid valve 
shuts off flow. Just use a measureing device like a burett. when you come 
back to it read the burett and see how many ml was used.

Logan Vilas
- Original Message - 
From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] automating titration


 Hey Jason;

 If you are bent on doing this, why not approach it from a different
 angle?  Make a system that imitates what you do yourself, instead of
 trying to do it numerically just make a system that does what you do.
 It could all be done by way of gravity feed and counting drops by use of
 optical sensors.  You add a few drops of indicator and then keep adding
 titration solution until the indicator goes off and stays for 10
 seconds.  That's 8.4 ph.  Again a photosensor is used to detect the
 colour change condition.
 This will for sure work and eliminates much of the problem with trying
 to meter flows.

 Joe

 Jason  Katie wrote:

Mr. McGinness
i thank you for the advice on the pumps/ flow controls, i hadnt considered
ready-made equipment (i usually build my own rig) ill have to look into
that, but my problem does not lie within the realm of mechanics. i need a
mathematical equation that i can manipulate to find the volume of  base
needed to bring the acid to a pH of 8.4.

the knowns will be:

pH of the base (by reference measurement)
pH of the Oil (by measurement)
volume of the oil (by external input)

the variable will be:

volume of base needed to reach a pH of 8.4

i have the outline of what i need, i just dont know how to put it together
and make it work and pH isnt some simple (A+B)/C= your number here
equation, which is confusing me beyond anything ive ever tried before (im
horrible at math).


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/






 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] more mercedes help

2006-03-16 Thread Kenji James Fuse
This is a solicitation for help from the Mercedes buffs out there. Some of
you will say 'go to a mercedes forum', but last time there were several
really useful replies.

I plan to install a second fuel tank next week, so now I have to decide
how to do it. The vehicle is a 1976 Mercedes-Benz 300D.

Here's the big question:

It seems the injector pump has a lift pump on it's side, where the
original fuel line first goes, before going to the main fuel filter
and into the ip (is this a correct assumption?). Do I have to put the
solenoid fuel tank selector valve
before this, or can I leave the original fuel line as is and put the
solenoid right before the fuel feed into the injector pump proper?

Thanks in advance,

Kenji Fuse


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] The End of Dollar Hegemony

2006-03-16 Thread Kirk McLoren
I had conversations over a decade ago with a Belgian who had lived in Argentina (I think) when they experienced triple digit inflation. In other words currency collapse. He said it was quite an experience. The infrastructure fragmented. The electrical grid etc was no longer maintained. If you had extra money you bought something - even a garment that didnt fit as you could barter it next month for more than if you held the money.  A good time to have storage facility - for anything.KirkKeith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  See also:http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12346.htmGlobal Economic Hegemony: A New Kind of Warfare?By Kaleem Hussain03/15/06 "ICSSA"The Proposed Iranian Oil
 Boursehttp://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg59546.htmlPetrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Boursehttp://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg59538.html-http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11946.htmThe End of Dollar Hegemony
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
		Relax. Yahoo! Mail 
virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Mexico discovers 'huge' oil field

2006-03-16 Thread Kirk McLoren
  Wednesday, 15 March 2006, 11:44 GMThttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4808466.stmMexico discovers 'huge' oil fieldMexican President Vicente Fox has announced the discovery of a newdeep-water oil field, which is believed to contain 10bn barrels of crude.The field is in the Gulf of Mexico, and Mexico says it could be biggerthan its largest oil field, Cantarell.Production there is said to have declined sharply in recent years.Mr Fox made the announcement as figures showed the country's total oilreserves had fallen 2% between 2003 and 2005.Perforation of the well known as Noxal 1, which is located about 100km(60 miles) from the port of Coatzacoalcos on the coast of Veracruzstate, started in December.The oil is under 930 metres (0.6 miles) of water and a further 4,000metres (2.5 miles)
 underground.Visiting the drilling platform, Mr Fox said: "With Noxal we will begin anew era of oil exploration in our country."The government says its investment in exploration will enable Mexico tomaintain its current output in the future.With at least 3.4m barrels per day, Mexico is Latin America's largestcrude producer ahead of Venezuela and Brazil, according to theInternational Energy Agency (IEA).The oil industry provides one third of the Mexican state income. Morethan half the crude extracted is exported, mainly to the United States.The state-owned company Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) is among the biggestplayers in the international oil market.Mexico is not a member of oil producers' cartel Opec.
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Mexico discovers 'huge' oil field

2006-03-16 Thread Michael Redler
This will change US-Mexico relations.The timing is interesting sincesocial democracy is taking hold inSouth America, putting Mexico between hegemony and democracy with oilhanging as a dangling carrot.MikeKirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Wednesday, 15 March 2006, 11:44 GMThttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4808466.stmMexico discovers 'huge' oil fieldMexican President Vicente Fox has announced the discovery of a newdeep-water oil field, which is believed to contain 10bn barrels of crude.The field is in the Gulf of Mexico, and Mexico says it could be biggerthan its largest oil field, Cantarell.Production there is said to have declined sharply in recent years.Mr Fox made the announcement as figures showed the country's total oilreserves had fallen 2% between 2003 and
 2005.Perforation of the well known as Noxal 1, which is located about 100km(60 miles) from the port of Coatzacoalcos on the coast of Veracruzstate, started in December.The oil is under 930 metres (0.6 miles) of water and a further 4,000metres (2.5 miles) underground.Visiting the drilling platform, Mr Fox said: "With Noxal we will begin anew era of oil exploration in our country."The government says its investment in exploration will enable Mexico tomaintain its current output in the future.With at least 3.4m barrels per day, Mexico is Latin America's largestcrude producer ahead of Venezuela and Brazil, according to theInternational Energy Agency (IEA).The oil industry provides one third of the Mexican state income. Morethan half the crude extracted is exported, mainly to the United States.The state-owned company Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) is among the biggestplayers in the international oil
 market.Mexico is not a member of oil producers' cartel Opec.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] The End of Dollar Hegemony

2006-03-16 Thread Zeke Yewdall
Hmmm.  Makes me feel better about having no cash reserves, but a
stockpile of PV modules in my garage

On 3/16/06, Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I had conversations over a decade ago with a Belgian who had lived in
 Argentina (I think) when they experienced triple digit inflation. In other
 words currency collapse. He said it was quite an experience. The
 infrastructure fragmented. The electrical grid etc was no longer maintained.
 If you had extra money you bought something - even a garment that didnt fit
 as you could barter it next month for more than if you held the money.
 A good time to have storage facility - for anything.

 Kirk


 Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 See also:

 http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12346.htm
 Global Economic Hegemony: A New Kind of Warfare?
 By Kaleem Hussain
 03/15/06 ICSSA

 The Proposed Iranian Oil Bourse
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg59546.html

 Petrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg59538.html

 -

 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11946.htm

 The End of Dollar Hegemony



  
  Yahoo! Mail
  Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

  
 Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!




 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] more mercedes help

2006-03-16 Thread Zeke Yewdall
Hmmm. Dunno on the mercedes.  The VW injector pumps have a built in
lift pump which is integral to the injector pump -- no external lines
between the lift pump and the injector pump.  I suspect that if there
is an external lift pump on the mercedes, that the injector pump
cannot function without a lift pump.  Therefore, it probably wouldn't
work to put the switchover valve between the fuel filter and the
injector pump, unless you use a separate lift pump for the veggie oil
circuit.  And probably put a return line for the diesel lift pump so
it doesn't get dead headed when you switch to the veggie oil circuit. 
I would go the extra lift pump route, rather than switching before the
filter, as it will take a long time to purge the filter if it's full
of veggie oil when you want to shut down.  I can't remember exactly
where the switchover valves were on the '74 mercedes we convertered --
I didn't do the conversion myself, and it'snot handy to look at right
now.  I do remember that it seemed to take a long time for the veggie
oil to get to the engine after throwing the switch -- you could tell
when it got there, because all of a sudden it would sound like a gas
engine at idle instead of the normal diesel clatter.

 I've been using cheap ($45 or so) electric fuel pumps designed for
carbureated gas cars for an extra lift pump/primer pump for my VW even
though it has the built in one.  So far (a few months) the biodiesel
hasn't eaten it up.

On 3/16/06, Kenji James Fuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is a solicitation for help from the Mercedes buffs out there. Some of
 you will say 'go to a mercedes forum', but last time there were several
 really useful replies.

 I plan to install a second fuel tank next week, so now I have to decide
 how to do it. The vehicle is a 1976 Mercedes-Benz 300D.

 Here's the big question:

 It seems the injector pump has a lift pump on it's side, where the
 original fuel line first goes, before going to the main fuel filter
 and into the ip (is this a correct assumption?). Do I have to put the
 solenoid fuel tank selector valve
 before this, or can I leave the original fuel line as is and put the
 solenoid right before the fuel feed into the injector pump proper?

 Thanks in advance,

 Kenji Fuse


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] automating titration

2006-03-16 Thread Zeke Yewdall
It's been a few years since I took chemistry, but I seem to recall
that pH is a logarithm of the number of H+ ions in solution.  At least
in an aqueous solution.  That definition might not hold up under a
non-aqueous solution such as methoxide.  But if you convert from pH to
moles of H+ or OH- ions, and you know the concentration of such ions
in your titration solution, you should be able to come up with a
formula to determine the amount needed to get to a pH of 8.4.

Zeke

On 3/15/06, Jason  Katie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 i thank you for your help Mr. Mahoney.

 the known variables will be:

 pH of the base (by reference measurement)
 pH of the Oil (by measurement)
 volume of the oil (by external input)

 the unknown will be:

 volume of base needed to reach a pH of 8.4

 i dont really need numbers, just a formula that i can put into a program,
 the knowns will all be taken from the test sequence and the unknown will be
 found and used in the process plus a small excess.
 i have no background in chemistry, so this is all very new to me, and im
 probably in over my head, but i will try whatever i can to make this work.

 P.S. i tried to send this to your email address and it didnt accept it, i
 may have entered it incorrectly.

 thank you,
 Jason


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Why Iran's oil bourse can't break the buck

2006-03-16 Thread biofuel
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HC10Ak01.html

Mar 10, 2006

Why Iran's oil bourse can't break the buck
By F William Engdahl

A number of writings have recently appeared with the thesis that the announced
plans of the Iranian government to institute a Tehran oil bourse, perhaps as
early as this month, is the real hidden reason behind the evident march to war
on Iran by the Anglo-American powers. The thesis is simply wrong for many
reasons, not least that war on Iran has been in planning since the 1990s as an
integral part of the United States' Greater Middle East strategy.

More significant, the oil-bourse argument is a red herring that diverts
attention from the real geopolitical grounds behind the



march toward war that have been detailed on this website, including in my piece,
A high-risk game of nuclear chicken,  which appeared in Asia Times Online on
January 31.
(http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HA31Ak02.html)

In 1996, Richard Perle and Douglas Feith, two neo-conservatives later to play an
important role in formulation of Bush administration's Pentagon policy in the
Middle East, authored a paper for then newly elected Israeli prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu. That advisory paper, A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm, called on Netanyahu to make a clean break from the peace
process. Perle and Feith also called on Netanyahu to strengthen Israel's
defenses against Syria and Iraq, and to go after Iran as the prop of Syria.

More than a year before President George W Bush declared his shock and awe
operation against Iraq, he made his now-infamous January 2002 State of the
Union address to Congress in which he labeled Iran, along with Iraq and North
Korea, as a member of the axis of evil trio. This was well before anyone in
Tehran was even considering establishing an oil bourse to trade oil in various
currencies.

The argument by those who believe the Tehran oil bourse would be the casus
belli, the trigger pushing Washington down the road to potential thermonuclear
annihilation of Iran, seems to rest on the claim that by openly trading oil to
other nations or buyers in euros, Tehran would set into motion a chain of
events in which nation after nation, buyer after buyer, would line up to buy
oil no longer in US dollars but in euros. That, in turn, goes the argument,
would lead to a panic selling of dollars on world foreign-exchange markets and
a collapse of the role of the dollar as reserve currency, one of the pillars
of Empire. Basta! There goes the American Century down the tubes with the
onset of the Tehran oil bourse.

Some background considerations
That argument fails to convince for a number of reasons. First, in the case of
at least one of the oil-bourse theorists, the argument is based on a
misunderstanding of the process I described in my book, A Century of War,
regarding the creation in 1974 of petrodollar recycling, a process with which
then-US secretary of state Henry Kissinger was deeply involved, in the wake of
the 400% oil-price hike orchestrated by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC).

The US dollar then did not become a petrodollar, although Kissinger spoke
about the process of recycling petrodollars. What he was referring to was the
initiation of a new phase of US global hegemony in which the petrodollar export
earnings of OPEC oil lands would be recycled into the hands of the major New
York and London banks and re-lent in the form of US dollar loans to oil-deficit
countries such as Brazil and Argentina, creating what soon came to be known as
the Latin American debt crisis.

The dollar at that time had been a fiat currency since August 1971 when
president Richard Nixon first abrogated the Bretton Woods Treaty and refused to
redeem US dollars held by foreign central banks for gold bullion. The dollar
floated against other major currencies, falling more or less until it was
revived by the 1973-74 oil-price shock.

What the oil shock achieved for the sagging dollar was a sudden injection of
global demand from nations confronted with 400% higher oil-import bills. At
that time, by postwar convention and convenience, as the dollar was the only
reserve currency held around the world other than gold, oil was priced by all
OPEC members in dollars as a practical exigency.

With the 400% price rise, nations such as France, Germany and Japan suddenly
found reason to try to buy their oil directly in their own currencies - French
francs, Deutschmarks or Japanese yen - to lessen the pressure on their rapidly
declining reserves of trade dollars. The US Treasury and the Pentagon made
certain that did not happen, partly with some secret diplomacy by Kissinger,
bullying threats, and a whopping-big US military agreement with the key OPEC
producer, Saudi Arabia. At that time it helped that the shah of Iran was seen
in Washington to be a vassal of Kissinger.

The point was not that the US dollar became a petro currency. The point was
that the reserve 

Re: [Biofuel] more mercedes help

2006-03-16 Thread MARIA BURGER




Hi Kenji !
You are correct. The black gizmo on the side of the MB injection pump is 
indeed a lift pump. It keeps the IP body full of fuel at a small pressure, 
something like 3 or 4 psi. The main thing to remember on a two tank setup is 
that the fuel line coming out of the top of the spin on filter is the return to 
the tank! The lift pump pulls fuel from the tank, pushes it through the two fuel 
filters, then through the IP body, and finally back to the fuel tank. The vast 
majority of the fuel pumped is just going around in circles and not being used 
by the engine. If you just switch the suction side from one tank to the other, 
you will still be returning fuel to the original tank. This means you need two 
selector valves, one on the suction side of the pump, and the other on the 
return so you are returning fuel to the same tank you are pumping it out of. The 
problem with the two selector valve system is that when you switch tanks, all of 
the fuel in the IP, the fuel filters, and the fuel lines winds up in the "other" 
tank. This means every time you switch tanks, you slightly contaminate your BD 
tank with Diesel. No big deal, but when you switch back, you put some BD in your 
diesel tank which can freeze up in cold weather, plug your filters and 
stop the car. On my '77 240D (same car minus one cylinder), I run a float bowl 
mounted in the trunk which the lift pump sucks out of and returns to. The float 
bowl is kept full by one of two electric fuel pumps. One for the diesel tank and 
one for the BD tank. These pumps have check valves so the fuel only can go 
through one way and connect to a tee right before the float bowl. This means my 
BD tank never gets diesel in it and, more importantly my diesel tank never gets 
BD in it. There are no selector valves in the system at all. I just turn on the 
appropriate pump and away we go on french fry squeezin's. I also have a heat 
exchanger on the return line from the IP. This heats the fuel before it heads 
back to the float bowl in the trunk keeping my insulated fuel lines from 
freezing in the winter. Sorry for the long post, but I'm just delighted to get 
to share some knowledge! 
Chris Rice 

  - Original Message - 
  From: Kenji 
  James Fuse 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:28 
  AM
  Subject: [Biofuel] more mercedes 
  help
  This is a solicitation for help from the Mercedes buffs out 
  there. Some ofyou will say 'go to a mercedes forum', but last time there 
  were severalreally useful replies.I plan to install a second fuel 
  tank next week, so now I have to decidehow to do it. The vehicle is a 1976 
  Mercedes-Benz 300D.Here's the big question:It seems the 
  injector pump has a lift pump on it's side, where theoriginal fuel line 
  first goes, before going to the main fuel filterand into the ip (is this a 
  correct assumption?). Do I have to put thesolenoid fuel tank selector 
  valvebefore this, or can I leave the original fuel line as is and put 
  thesolenoid right before the fuel feed into the injector pump 
  proper?Thanks in advance,Kenji 
  Fuse___Biofuel 
  mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to Forever:MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "journeytoforever.org" claiming to be http://journeytoforeverorg/biofuel.htmlSearch 
  the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] automating titration

2006-03-16 Thread Jason Katie
thats just it, i wont be metering flows, it will be two seperate meters in 
two seperate containers, one will be the base methoxide and one will be 
directly in the oil tank. the volume of oil will be entered by hand into the 
computer, and the pH of each substance will be entered electronically, 
removing any human clumsiness and gaining an accuracy my daft fingers never 
could, and the fewer mechanical parts there are means the less chance there 
will be a breakdown. after a time when i can build another accessory i could 
measure and enter the volume of oil electronically also. with 
photodetection, you have to be very picky about timing, and to adequately 
time something with an analog system would be extremely complicated and not 
likely to work with the equipment i have in my posession. it would have been 
possible two years ago, but i no longer have access to the college lab, and 
cannot afford the 7500$ bits of equipment they so happily supply their 
students.

- Original Message - 
From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] automating titration


 Hey Jason;

 If you are bent on doing this, why not approach it from a different
 angle?  Make a system that imitates what you do yourself, instead of
 trying to do it numerically just make a system that does what you do.
 It could all be done by way of gravity feed and counting drops by use of
 optical sensors.  You add a few drops of indicator and then keep adding
 titration solution until the indicator goes off and stays for 10
 seconds.  That's 8.4 ph.  Again a photosensor is used to detect the
 colour change condition.
 This will for sure work and eliminates much of the problem with trying
 to meter flows.

 Joe 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] [EMAIL PROTECTED] more mercedes help

2006-03-16 Thread Dan Albano
Kenji,  If you end up plumbing the solenoid valve in between the lift pump and injector pump, you will need to add a separate fuel pump to the vegetable oil circuit. The injector pump can create very high pressure, but produces nothing in the way of vaccuum. The lift pump is required to keep the injector pump fed with fuel. I would put the solenoid valve before the lift pump. Installation will be much simpler. 
 Dan Albano
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/