[Biofuel] Nova Scotia rate hearing

2006-09-05 Thread Kirk McLoren
Nova Scotia town's fate hangs on Stora electricity rate hearingCBC News - Canada  HALIFAX (CP) - As complex hearings begin Tuesday into electricity rate formulas for two Nova Scotia pulp mills, the residents of a Cape Breton mill town will be watching - and worrying.   Finnish papermaker Stora Enso has made it clear the stakes before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board are high: cut the power rates significantly or its mill in Port Hawkesbury stays closed.   That's a disaster scenario for northeastern Nova Scotia, says town mayor Billy Joe MacLean.   "Stora is the foundation of our community, and for 100 miles around the town," he said in an interview.   "If you lose Stora you would lose the economic foundations of eastern Nova Scotia."   After two years of double-digit price hikes, the pulp company wants a new pricing formula that would slice at least 10 per cent from its estimated annual $97 million power bill.   The Bowater Mersey mill, based in Liverpool, is part of Stora's submission and is also seeking reduced power rates.   But there's firm opposition to granting the mills what they want, with Nova Scotia Power arguing it would mean a massive bill is shifted over to its other customers.
   The publicly traded utility (TSX:EMA) has produced estimates that other customers would have to share $200 million in increased costs over four or five years if Stora's formula is accepted.   Al Dominie, a veteran energy consultant, says that could "result in an increase in rates of about five per cent to all of the other ratepayers in Nova Scotia if distributed evenly."   MacLean admits such a scenario would spell "political suicide" for a Conservative minority government falling in the polls.   Instead, he predicts there will have to be a compromise between the private utility and the mills.   "Behind the scenes there's discussions as we speak, hoping to resolve this through agreement," he claimed.   However, business analysts say a compromise may be difficult for Stora and Bowater, as their eastern
 Canadian mills continue to operate at a loss.   Stephen Atkinson, a Montreal-based industry analyst with BMO Nesbitt Burns, said even if there is a compromise, the Stora mill's future is uncertain.   "You can make the product more cheaply in Europe. Why lose money? I would call this situation as being on the edge."   Still, Stora may be influenced by the willingness of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers union to accept a contract that cut wages by up to 10 per cent after a painful six-month lockout.   And the province has also offered subsidies of $10 million a year for six years, and $5 million in the seventh. In exchange, the province is no longer required to provide Crown land for logging.   These kinds of issues aren't likely to be discussed a great deal during the board's hearing.   Instead,
 lawyers will focus on often impenetrable arguments over competing formulas for setting the price of the large mills.   Nova Scotia Power's method would give the pulp mills credits by having their power interrupted during peak consumption periods. That system allows the firms to avoid using costly generation during periods of high electricity use.   Stora hasn't said if that would result in any direct price cut.   Meanwhile, Stora has proposed a system known as a "real-time pricing formula," which it says more closely tracks the cost savings the power corporation receives when a mill reduces power consumption in peak periods.   Despite the problems, some observers see cause for long-term optimism, and reason that Stora may wish to compromise.   Tom Adams, director of Toronto-based Energy Probe, says it's expected that in a few years
 Nova Scotia Power's prices may moderate.   "The increase in world prices is turning around. The outlook is for a significant decrease and that fuel price savings will show up on consumer bills in the next few years," he argues.   Meanwhile, MacLean foresees Stora eventually receiving government assistance to build a $60 million co-generation plant, which will produce power for the factory and sell energy back to the power grid.   If an agreement outside of the hearing doesn't occur, the board is expected to rule within 30 days on a formula.   The company has indicated it will make a final decision then on whether to fully re-open its paper machines.   Stora currently has about 200 people working at the mill, restoring it to normal operations after the lockout.  
		Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com.  Check it out. 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Government unprepared for nuclear disaster

2006-09-05 Thread D. Mindock



I doubt if BushCo is 
ready for any type of disaster. Its focus is on war and
creating new terrorists. This is their "creative chaos" 
and I think it's insane.
Peace, D. Mindock P.S. Google "bush creative 
chaos" 

09/4/2006 
Government unprepared for nuclear disaster; 
volunteers patrol San Francisco Bay
As the United States prepares to commemorate the Sept 11 
attack as well as Hurricane Katrina, a group of activist physicians released a 
report faulting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for lack of 
preparedness (Geoff Morrell, ABC 
News 8/31/06). 
There are no communication plans to tell the public 
whether to evacuate or shelter, no radiologic monitoring instruments, and little 
surge capacity in the medical system, complain prominent members of Physicians 
for Social Responsibility (PSR). 
There are also no public shelters and no plans to 
disseminate life-saving information on expedient shelter and radiation 
detection, notes AAPS Executive Director Jane Orient, M.D., in a 
just-published article in the Journal of 
American Physicians and Surgeons. The rudimentary U.S. civil defense system 
was dismantled, largely owing to anti-defense activism by PSR and others. The 
fallout shelter inventory, the state stockpiles of regularly calibrated 
radiologic instruments, packaged disaster hospitals, and emergency 
communications were all casualties of PSR opposition. 
PSR is now, unapologetically, issuing updated “bombing 
runs” (The U.S. and Nuclear Terrorism, www.psr.org). In addition to calculating early casualties in an unprepared, 
unsheltered population, PSR red-lines vast areas that would be “uninhabitable” 
for decades, with economic losses of trillions of dollars, based on the 
assertion that “there is no dose threshold at which exposure to radiation is 
safe.” Their maps show scary plumes from a “dirty bomb,” with doses ranging from 
6 rem to as low as one-millionth of a rem—mentioning neither the fact that below 
100 rem there would be no acute symptoms, nor the biphasic dose-response curve 
for radiation exposure (with beneficial effects over a wide range of low doses). 

Though not among the PSR scenarios, the detonation of a 
nuclear weapon in a port facility is one of the likelier possibilities. A RAND 
study showed that a 10-KT explosion in the Port of Long Beach could cause 60,000 
immediate casualties and ten times as much economic damage as the Sept 11 
attacks (Greg Krikorian, LA Times 8/16/06). 
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency 
(IAEA), there were 650 cases of illicit trafficking of nuclear and radiologic 
materials worldwide between 1993 and 2004. As of February, 75 percent of U.S. 
ports had no ability to screen for nuclear weapons, and only 5 percent of 11 
million containers were inspected at all. 
The DHS is planning to install $1.15 billion worth of 
radiation detectors in U.S. ports—by 2011. The new monitors will cost between 
$600,000 and $800,000 each. 
Currently, 14-foot, $180,000 pillars detect gamma rays and 
high-energy neutrons when container-laden trucks drive between them. However, 
truck drivers in a hurry drive can drive around the portal, stated Sandia Lab 
weapons subcontractor Stanley Glaros. 
Glaros and his team are plying the waters of San Francisco 
Bay with a homemade detector costing about $12,000. His biggest headache, Glaros 
says, is that if he detects something, by the time he gets an official response 
it may be too late. 
“I’ve been in this business since SALT I,” Glaros said. 
“It’s gonna happen; it’s just a question of when” (Mark Rutherford, Wired News 8/22/06). 
While the entire U.S. effort is focused on interdiction 
(“prevention”) rather than response and recovery, Shanghai just announced 
completion of an underground bunker, constructed in total secrecy, that can 
accommodate 200,000 people. Its 2.5 miles of passages cannot compete in scale 
with the “Underground Great Wall” containing 19 miles of air-raid shelters, 
which was built beneath Beijing in the 1960s and 1970s (Jane Macartney, Times 7/31/06). 
Additional information:


  Special issue on preparedness, AzMedicine 
  
  “Is 
  Chronic Radiation an Effective Prophylaxis Against Cancer?” by W.L. Chen et al., J Am Phys Surg, spring 2004. 
  
  
  “Homeland Security Proposes Accepting Higher Radiation Exposure 
  in the Event of a ‘Dirty Bomb’ Attack,” News of 
  the Day 1/7/06. 
  
  “New York Hospitals to Be Equipped with Radiation 
  Detectors,” News of the Day 1/5/06. 
  

 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread Tonomár András



What are you people talking about?

have you ever made any type of biofuel? 

Seems to me that you are confusing them 
all.
Acid Base process and ethanol fuel?
Methanol vs ethanol? It has sense in biodiesel 
production, but you are talking 
alcohol fuel for petroleum engines. 

Does not make too much sense.
Andrew


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Derick Giorchino 
  
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:01 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's 
  Methanol
  
  
  Hi Doug I am 
  interested in the ethanol production you are using. What is it can you point 
  me in the right direction? Is it the acid base as is explained at J.T.F.? As 
  for the carb problems maybe a marine carb is more tolerant of the alcohol fuel 
  if not there are places that could chrome or anodize the carb bowls for a 
  price you would need to re thread all the holes. Or maybe powder coating would 
  work.
  Good luck 
  Derick
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lres1Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:03 
  AMTo: 
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgSubject: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's 
  Methanol
  
  
  Would like to know the advantages 
  if any of using Methanol instead of Ethanol in making bio-diesel. It is very 
  easy to make Ethanol with down to 15% water. Seems kinda silly to make Ethanol 
  and Methanol if Ethanol will do all.
  
  
  
  Have now got a MPEFI Jeep running 
  on 80% Ethanol and 20% water as a straight injection. Have a few bugs to work 
  out but total conversion cost is less than 
  US$20.00.
  
  To convert back to RUG is a flick 
  of a switch on the dash.
  
  
  
  This makes more sense now to use 
  the Ethanol instead of making Methanol for bio-diesel production as I already 
  make the ethanol and it can replace RUG in a MPEFI engine or standard carb 
  engine. I still have no replies on how to lacquer or coat an alloy carburetor 
  to stop reactions with the Ethanol. At present The system is fully drained and 
  blown with compressed air to clear out all water and Ethanol. Would be kinda 
  nice to be able to shut the engines off and just walk away and not have the 
  cleaning time. 
  
  
  
  I do not want to get rid of the 
  water in my Ethanol replacement for RUG as it gives much more power than RUG 
  at 80 to 85% Ethanol and 15 to 20% water mix. The plasticized fuel tanks and 
  lines can handle it all the carbs can not.
  
  
  
  My next step is to try and run 502 
  C.I.V8 engines and 351 modified engines and 350 C.I. engineswith 4 
  barrel hollies on Ethanol but need to clear up the carb reaction problems with 
  the alloys involved.
  
  
  
  Would like to know how to get to 
  0.5% water for bio-diesel processing. Same question as JJJN I 
  guess
  
  
  
  Doug 
  
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Israel Plans for War With Iran and Syria

2006-09-05 Thread fox mulder


Israeli officials 'face war crimes risk'


Israel's public officials have been told to watch what
they say in public about the Lebanese and Palestinian
conflicts for fear of being prosecuted for war crimes,
political sources say.

The sources say the foreign ministry has established a
legal team to deal with efforts by foreign groups to
arrange the prosecution abroad of Israelis involved in
the war against Hezbollah guerrillas and crackdowns on
Palestinians.

A ministry memorandum issued to Israel's military and
other government agencies urges officials to avoid
belligerent remarks that could potentially be used to
back up allegations they were complicit in excessive
use of force in Lebanon or Gaza.

The type of language now considered off-limits
includes 'crushing' the enemy, and 'cleansing',
'levelling', or 'wiping out' suspected enemy
emplacements, a political source who saw the memo
told Reuters.

The source quoted the memo as censuring one official
who called for Israel to respond to Hezbollah rockets
strikes against the strategic port city of Haifa
during the 34-day war by getting rid of a village in
Lebanon.

The foreign and justice ministries declined to
comment.

Political targets

According to the memo, numerous war crimes lawsuits
against Israeli officials were being prepared. It
cited venues such as France, Belgium, Morocco and
Britain, but no further details were immediately
available.

Three Moroccan lawyers said last month they were suing
the Israeli defence minister, Amir Peretz, over the
recent offensives. 

Israel Radio reported that a Danish politician also
tried to have Tzipi Livni, the foreign minister
detained and prosecuted during a recent visit to
Copenhagen but the request for an arrest warrant was
turned down by prosecutors.

An Israeli cabinet minister said that while military
officials had been singled out in foreign lawsuits,
politicians were still largely immune.

There is, without a doubt, an effort among various
organisations to lash out at our officers and
commanders, Isaac Herzog, the tourism minister, told
Israel's Army Radio by telephone during a visit to
Finland.

Of course this does not affect the political
echelons.

Israel says its armed forces act within international
norms and accuses Hezbollah and Palestinian factions
of inviting civilian casualties by operating within
populated areas.

Exchange rumours

Meanwhile Ehud Olmert, the Israeli prime minister,
denied rumours of a deal that would see Palestinian
prisoners released in exchange for Corporal Gilad
Shalit, the soldier captured by fighters in Gaza on
June 25.

He was quoted as telling the defence and foreign
affairs committee that all the publications and
information about the possible release of the
kidnapped soldiers are false.

On Sunday, the Yediot Aharonot newspaper said that
under secret talks negotiated by Egypt, Israel could
release up to 800 Palestinian prisoners in return for
Shalit.

Israel has demanded Shalit's unconditional release,
but local media have reported that talks have been
under way for several weeks.

 




___ 
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. The New Version is radically easier to use – The 
Wall Street Journal 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Need for a laugh

2006-09-05 Thread Mike Weaver



NBC anchor Brian Williams interviewed President Bush. He asked him 
about his poll numbers and President Bush said, 'The key for me is to 
keep expectations low.' I think you can accurately say, 'Mission 
Accomplished.' --Jay Leno

The one-year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina hitting New Orleans was 
marked by President Bush with a moment of silence. A little different 
than a year ago, when President Bush marked the occasion by a week and a 
half of silence. --Jay Leno

NBC News was also marking the anniversary [of Hurricane Katrina], but 
they had to settle for lesser celebrity guests, like this guy who took 
some time from a tour of New Orleans to tell Brian Williams about all 
the reading he's been doing this summer [on screen: President Bush 
saying he's read 'three Shakespeare's' this summer]. The point is that 
he read three Shakespeare's this summer and that's a great way to kick 
off eight grade --Jimmy Kimmel

I think President Bush gets confused. He said progress is being made in 
New Orleans and he hopes one day New Orleans will be a democracy. You 
know hurricanes, they hate freedom. --Jay Leno

Germany has offered to send troops to the Lebanon border. I bet 
Israel's breathing a sigh of relief there. Nothing makes Jewish people 
feel safer and more secure than the German Army marching on their 
border. --Jay Leno

President Bush is on television giving a speech and Kyra Phillips, an 
anchorwoman from CNN, gets up to go to the bathroom. She's wearing a 
microphone. She leaves the microphone on. Everyone was outraged. What's 
the big deal? She gets up to go the bathroom in the middle of a George 
W. Bush speech -- who hasn't done that? --David Letterman

Yesterday the president of Iran challenged President Bush to a 
televised debate. President Bush turned down the debate, but did 
challenge the Iranian president to a game of 'Hungry Hungry Hippos.' 
--Conan O'Brien

According to a national organization that studies obesity, nine of the 
fattest states in America are in the lower third of the country. In 
other words, geographically, America has a fat ass. --Conan O'Brien

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread Keith Addison
What are you people talking about?

have you ever made any type of biofuel?
Seems to me that you are confusing them all.
Acid Base process and ethanol fuel?
Methanol vs ethanol? It has sense in biodiesel production, but you are talking
alcohol fuel for petroleum engines.

Doug is being a bit confusing. He was talking about both ethanol fuel 
in gasoline engines and using ethanol to make biodiesel. Gasoline 
engines will run on 80% ethanol and 20% water (ie 160 proof) but to 
make ethyl esters biodiesel the ethanol must be dry, and Doug doesn't 
know how to make dry ethanol (absolute), he can't do better than 85% 
( you should be able to get 95% by distillation). So Doug's question 
about ethanol vs methanol for making biodiesel doesn't make much 
sense to me either. I don't think Doug has made biodiesel, or he 
wouldn't ask anyway - ethanol biodiesel is difficult to make, not for 
novices, not even when the ethanol is dry, methanol biodiesel is the 
way to start. I don't think we know of any novices who've succeeded 
with ethyl esters biodiesel. I don't know how Doug was planning to 
make methanol, there's no small-scale backyard way of producing 
methanol. He seems to think you can make it by treating sawdust with 
concentrated acid, but that makes ethanol, not methanol. I also don't 
understand the reference to the acid-base process for producing 
ethanol, the acid-base process at JtF produces biodiesel, not 
ethanol. Oh well.

Has nobody yet discovered whether the castor oil method for producing 
absolute ethanol works or not? I've been after a source of 20 litres 
of castor oil here in Japan but I haven't found it yet. The method is 
here:

Separating Ethanol From Water Via Differential Miscibility -- using castor oil
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/eth_separate.html#castoil

Best

Keith

Does not make too much sense.
Andrew


- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Derick Giorchino
To: mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.orgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

Hi Doug I am interested in the ethanol production you are using. 
What is it can you point me in the right direction? Is it the acid 
base as is explained at J.T.F.? As for the carb problems maybe a 
marine carb is more tolerant of the alcohol fuel if not there are 
places that could chrome or anodize the carb bowls for a price you 
would need to re thread all the holes. Or maybe powder coating would 
work.

Good luck Derick


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lres1
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:03 AM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol



Would like to know the advantages if any of using Methanol instead 
of Ethanol in making bio-diesel. It is very easy to make Ethanol 
with down to 15% water. Seems kinda silly to make Ethanol and 
Methanol if Ethanol will do all.



Have now got a MPEFI Jeep running on 80% Ethanol and 20% water as a 
straight injection. Have a few bugs to work out but total conversion 
cost is less than US$20.00.

To convert back to RUG is a flick of a switch on the dash.



This makes more sense now to use the Ethanol instead of making 
Methanol for bio-diesel production as I already make the ethanol and 
it can replace RUG in a MPEFI engine or standard carb engine. I 
still have no replies on how to lacquer or coat an alloy carburetor 
to stop reactions with the Ethanol. At present The system is fully 
drained and blown with compressed air to clear out all water and 
Ethanol. Would be kinda nice to be able to shut the engines off and 
just walk away and not have the cleaning time.



I do not want to get rid of the water in my Ethanol replacement for 
RUG as it gives much more power than RUG at 80 to 85% Ethanol and 15 
to 20% water mix. The plasticized fuel tanks and lines can handle it 
all the carbs can not.



My next step is to try and run 502 C.I. V8 engines and 351 modified 
engines and 350 C.I. engines with 4 barrel hollies on Ethanol but 
need to clear up the carb reaction problems with the alloys involved.



Would like to know how to get to 0.5% water for bio-diesel 
processing. Same question as JJJN I guess



Doug


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] It's seeping North

2006-09-05 Thread Mike Weaver

  Canadian Copyright Group Seeks To License the Net



http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/09/05/0418223.shtml

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Testing H2O in Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread Ken Provost

On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:19 PM, JJJN wrote:

 Would you have some baseline readings? and can you tell 85% from 95%
 with one of these?


They typically read off in percentage by volume of alcohol, as well as
proof and Baumé (whatever that is :-)). You can easily tell 98% from  
99%.

-K
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Testing H2O in Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread bob allen

For liquids heavier than water:

0 °Bé = distance the hydrometer sinks in pure water

15 °Bé = distance the hydrometer sinks in a solution that is 15% 
sodium chloride (salt, NaCl) by mass.

To convert from °Bé to specific gravity at 60 degrees Fahrenheit:

specific gravity = 145/(145 - °Bé)


For liquids lighter than water:

0 °Bé = distance the hydrometer sinks in a solution that is 10% sodium 
chloride (salt, NaCl) by mass

10 °Bé = distance the hydrometer sinks in pure water.

To convert from °Bé to specific gravity at 60 degrees Fahrenheit:

specific gravity = 140/(130 + °Bé)


(whew)


Ken Provost wrote:
 On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:19 PM, JJJN wrote:
 
 Would you have some baseline readings? and can you tell 85% from 95%
 with one of these?
 
 
 They typically read off in percentage by volume of alcohol, as well as
 proof and Baumé (whatever that is :-)). You can easily tell 98% from  
 99%.
 
 -K
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 
 


-- 
--
Bob Allen,http://ozarker.org/bob
--
-
The modern conservative is engaged in one of Man's oldest exercises
in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral
justification for selfishness  JKG
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Testing H2O in Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread Joe Street
Hi Jim;

Yes I got a couple of hydrometers 0.79 to 0.90 range and rather than try 
to find calibration tables for temperature etc I decided the thing to do 
is take some fresh pure methanol and measure it's SG at room temperature 
(about 20 degrees C in my place) and then add some measured amounts of 
room temperature water and record the SG values.  I haven't done it yet 
but will make a post when I do.  I am interested in determining how much 
water is in my recovered methanol, so I can gauge roughly how much 
zeolite I need to dry the stuff.  I expect to be somewhere in the range 
of 10% water or so hence the hydrometer range I bought works for the 
lower end water content.  I measued some recovered methanol I got from 
glycerin and it was 0.813 at RT and I measured another bunch that I cut 
off earlier in the process and it measured 0.798.  I'll give the more 
meaningful numbers soon.

Joe

JJJN wrote:

Does any one know of a good test to determine the amount of water in 
methanol?

Joe were you working on something like this?

Jim

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Testing H2O in Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread bob allen
a confounding variable in determining water in methanol (recovered 
from the glycerin cocktail)

depending on the distillation set up besides water and methanol you 
will also get glycerin- depending on the temperature and number of 
theoretical plates in your still.  How a small amount of glycerin will 
impact the density of the possibly ternary mixture, I don't know-



Joe Street wrote:
 Hi Jim;
 
 Yes I got a couple of hydrometers 0.79 to 0.90 range and rather than try 
 to find calibration tables for temperature etc I decided the thing to do 
 is take some fresh pure methanol and measure it's SG at room temperature 
 (about 20 degrees C in my place) and then add some measured amounts of 
 room temperature water and record the SG values.  I haven't done it yet 
 but will make a post when I do.  I am interested in determining how much 
 water is in my recovered methanol, so I can gauge roughly how much 
 zeolite I need to dry the stuff.  I expect to be somewhere in the range 
 of 10% water or so hence the hydrometer range I bought works for the 
 lower end water content.  I measued some recovered methanol I got from 
 glycerin and it was 0.813 at RT and I measured another bunch that I cut 
 off earlier in the process and it measured 0.798.  I'll give the more 
 meaningful numbers soon.
 
 Joe
 
 JJJN wrote:
 
 Does any one know of a good test to determine the amount of water in 
 methanol?

 Joe were you working on something like this?

 Jim

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  

 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 
 


-- 
--
Bob Allen,http://ozarker.org/bob
--
-
The modern conservative is engaged in one of Man's oldest exercises
in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral
justification for selfishness  JKG
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Ontario lags on climate change - Toronto Star - 2006.09.05

2006-09-05 Thread econogics
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/A
rticle_Type1c=Articlecid=1157104868030call_pageid=968256290204col=96
8350116795

PETER TABUNS

When Stephen Harper made clear his intention to drop the ball on Kyoto,
provinces started looking at one another to see who would pick it up.
Quebec was the first off the mark, with Manitoba close on its heels.

Quebec this past month introduced its renewed climate change plan based
on Kyoto targets. Under its plan, Manitoba is working to exceed Kyoto
targets. Cognizant of the cost of climate change, Quebec and Manitoba
took a page from some U.S. states and cities like New Jersey,
Massachusetts, California, and U.S. cities like New York who are taking
the action that their federal government, especially under George Bush,
has forsaken.

Ontario on the other hand has remained silent. Silence is a losing
policy.

With its greenhouse gas emissions growing by 16 per cent over the past
decade, Ontario will be hit hard by climate change. Changing rainfall
patterns will decrease crop yields, leave our northern forests at risk
to go up in smoke, and cause lake levels to decline, threatening the
fresh drinking water supplies and the production of hydroelectricity.
Higher temperatures will accelerate smog even if we are able to reduce
some of our output of pollution.

We are already eyewitnesses to climate change in our own backyard.
Extreme temperatures and violent storms strained Ontario's
infrastructure last summer and a repeat performance is playing out right
now.

Toronto Medical Officer of Health Dr. David McKeown has warned that
unless steps are taken to combat climate change, premature deaths
associated with extreme heat will continue to rise.

Premier Dalton McGuinty is sticking to the position that climate change
is a federal responsibility. It was in part this recalcitrance that
earned Ontario an F on climate change from the Sierra Club in June,
and a recommendation in the most recent report from the province's
Environmental Commissioner that Ontario develop its own climate change
strategy.

Contrary to the position taken by the premier, climate change falls
within his sphere of influence, since the province has jurisdiction to
reduce emissions in many ways the federal government cannot. A
made-in-Ontario climate change plan, based on Kyoto targets, would
entail reconfiguring current plans pertaining to energy, urban planning,
and transportation.

Must-haves under a made-in-Ontario plan would include:

*   Conservation and efficiency as its cornerstone. Closing
coal-fired generation, one of our largest sources of greenhouse gases,
in large part requires realigning resources toward conservation and
efficiency. Right now, only 2 per cent of Ontario's $83 billion energy
strategy is earmarked for programs that reduce demand and waste, despite
them being cheaper, quicker and pollution-free.

According to research commissioned by the government itself, 5,100 MW,
an amount greater than the power generated by three of Ontario's four
coal-fired plants, can be saved by improving efficiency standards for
appliances and equipment, providing incentives like rebates to consumers
and businesses to adopt less wasteful models, and constructing or
retrofitting buildings according to green building code standards. These
programs stand to save Ontarians $7 billion.

*   Harnessing Ontario's tremendous potential in renewables and
cogeneration can complete the job of weaning us off coal. Studies find
it's feasible that new wind and low-impact hydro alone could provide
9,700 MW. A comparable amount of power can be drawn from biomass and
solar, and geothermal pumps are viable but yet untapped means to cool
and heat homes instead of electricity. Cogeneration, a.k.a. recycling
energy in industrial facilities, paper mills, schools, and hospitals can
provide 16,514 MW - nearly three times more power that Ontario's
coal-fired plants produce combined.

But bringing these energy sources online is dependent upon the province
putting into place the mechanisms that will shift these alternatives
into the mainstream, e.g. tax credits to industry and institutions to
switch to renewables, revising regulations that pose a barrier to
cogeneration, and rebates to homeowners who install geothermal pumps.

*   Curbing sprawl and reinvigorating public transit: Sprawl spurs
traffic, the largest source of CO2. But, under proposed growth plans,
expanding highways that feed sprawl still trump renewing public transit,
and density targets are not high enough to support expansions of the
system. Having climate change targets can shift the focus toward
revitalizing and building more public transit.

In addition to maximizing environmental benefits, an Ontario climate
change plan will generate financial paybacks and ensure Ontario's
economic competitiveness for the future.

Building retrofitting programs would spur thousands of person-years of
employment in the building trades 

Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread Derick Giorchino
No Keith am not confused. I do make biodiesel. I use methanol and until some
one has a better way that's what I will use. I was asking about the
production of ethanol to use in other family vehicles. 
Since they are gas engines. I read on J.T.F. way back when I was starting
the venture of bio. That ethanol can be made at home using wood chips /paper
and I think there may have been also a mention of dry grass and brush and
breaking it down with sulfuric acid. But I would need to go back and read it
over. My quarry was as to the amount of yield verses raw product used per
liter /gal or what ever.
Thanks Derick.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:40 AM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

What are you people talking about?

have you ever made any type of biofuel?
Seems to me that you are confusing them all.
Acid Base process and ethanol fuel?
Methanol vs ethanol? It has sense in biodiesel production, but you are
talking
alcohol fuel for petroleum engines.

Doug is being a bit confusing. He was talking about both ethanol fuel 
in gasoline engines and using ethanol to make biodiesel. Gasoline 
engines will run on 80% ethanol and 20% water (ie 160 proof) but to 
make ethyl esters biodiesel the ethanol must be dry, and Doug doesn't 
know how to make dry ethanol (absolute), he can't do better than 85% 
( you should be able to get 95% by distillation). So Doug's question 
about ethanol vs methanol for making biodiesel doesn't make much 
sense to me either. I don't think Doug has made biodiesel, or he 
wouldn't ask anyway - ethanol biodiesel is difficult to make, not for 
novices, not even when the ethanol is dry, methanol biodiesel is the 
way to start. I don't think we know of any novices who've succeeded 
with ethyl esters biodiesel. I don't know how Doug was planning to 
make methanol, there's no small-scale backyard way of producing 
methanol. He seems to think you can make it by treating sawdust with 
concentrated acid, but that makes ethanol, not methanol. I also don't 
understand the reference to the acid-base process for producing 
ethanol, the acid-base process at JtF produces biodiesel, not 
ethanol. Oh well.

Has nobody yet discovered whether the castor oil method for producing 
absolute ethanol works or not? I've been after a source of 20 litres 
of castor oil here in Japan but I haven't found it yet. The method is 
here:

Separating Ethanol From Water Via Differential Miscibility -- using castor
oil
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/eth_separate.html#castoil

Best

Keith

Does not make too much sense.
Andrew


- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Derick Giorchino
To: mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.orgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

Hi Doug I am interested in the ethanol production you are using. 
What is it can you point me in the right direction? Is it the acid 
base as is explained at J.T.F.? As for the carb problems maybe a 
marine carb is more tolerant of the alcohol fuel if not there are 
places that could chrome or anodize the carb bowls for a price you 
would need to re thread all the holes. Or maybe powder coating would 
work.

Good luck Derick


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lres1
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:03 AM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol



Would like to know the advantages if any of using Methanol instead 
of Ethanol in making bio-diesel. It is very easy to make Ethanol 
with down to 15% water. Seems kinda silly to make Ethanol and 
Methanol if Ethanol will do all.



Have now got a MPEFI Jeep running on 80% Ethanol and 20% water as a 
straight injection. Have a few bugs to work out but total conversion 
cost is less than US$20.00.

To convert back to RUG is a flick of a switch on the dash.



This makes more sense now to use the Ethanol instead of making 
Methanol for bio-diesel production as I already make the ethanol and 
it can replace RUG in a MPEFI engine or standard carb engine. I 
still have no replies on how to lacquer or coat an alloy carburetor 
to stop reactions with the Ethanol. At present The system is fully 
drained and blown with compressed air to clear out all water and 
Ethanol. Would be kinda nice to be able to shut the engines off and 
just walk away and not have the cleaning time.



I do not want to get rid of the water in my Ethanol replacement for 
RUG as it gives much more power than RUG at 80 to 85% Ethanol and 15 
to 20% water mix. The plasticized fuel tanks and lines can handle it 
all the carbs can not.



My next step is to try and run 502 C.I. V8 engines and 351 modified 
engines and 350 C.I. engines with 4 barrel hollies on Ethanol but 
need to clear up the carb reaction problems with the alloys involved.


Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread bob allen
Derick, you are talking about cellolosic ethanol, that is ethanol made from 
cellulose, rather than 
from starch.  This is the holy grail of ethanol production. Very small 
amounts of ethanol can be 
made from sulfuric acid digestion of cellulose, but the yield is abysmal and 
the cost high.  My 
position is it is not worth the time, trouble, and expense.  the problems are 
manifold.  First is 
the fact that the lignin present, which binds the cellulose, is not easily 
separable from the 
cellulose,and hydrolysis of cellulose to free the sugars is much more difficult 
that that of starch, 
and finally the sugars released from cellulose fermentation are not easily 
fermentable with yeast.
Big bucks have been spent trying to solve these problems since at least the 
70's with little or no 
success.  Simply, if it were easy, it would be happening everywhere, as the 
feedstock- cellulosic 
wastes-are abundant.


Derick Giorchino wrote:
 No Keith am not confused. I do make biodiesel. I use methanol and until some
 one has a better way that's what I will use. I was asking about the
 production of ethanol to use in other family vehicles. 
 Since they are gas engines. I read on J.T.F. way back when I was starting
 the venture of bio. That ethanol can be made at home using wood chips /paper
 and I think there may have been also a mention of dry grass and brush and
 breaking it down with sulfuric acid. But I would need to go back and read it
 over. My quarry was as to the amount of yield verses raw product used per
 liter /gal or what ever.
 Thanks Derick.  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Addison
 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:40 AM
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol
 
 What are you people talking about?

 have you ever made any type of biofuel?
 Seems to me that you are confusing them all.
 Acid Base process and ethanol fuel?
 Methanol vs ethanol? It has sense in biodiesel production, but you are
 talking
 alcohol fuel for petroleum engines.
 
 Doug is being a bit confusing. He was talking about both ethanol fuel 
 in gasoline engines and using ethanol to make biodiesel. Gasoline 
 engines will run on 80% ethanol and 20% water (ie 160 proof) but to 
 make ethyl esters biodiesel the ethanol must be dry, and Doug doesn't 
 know how to make dry ethanol (absolute), he can't do better than 85% 
 ( you should be able to get 95% by distillation). So Doug's question 
 about ethanol vs methanol for making biodiesel doesn't make much 
 sense to me either. I don't think Doug has made biodiesel, or he 
 wouldn't ask anyway - ethanol biodiesel is difficult to make, not for 
 novices, not even when the ethanol is dry, methanol biodiesel is the 
 way to start. I don't think we know of any novices who've succeeded 
 with ethyl esters biodiesel. I don't know how Doug was planning to 
 make methanol, there's no small-scale backyard way of producing 
 methanol. He seems to think you can make it by treating sawdust with 
 concentrated acid, but that makes ethanol, not methanol. I also don't 
 understand the reference to the acid-base process for producing 
 ethanol, the acid-base process at JtF produces biodiesel, not 
 ethanol. Oh well.
 
 Has nobody yet discovered whether the castor oil method for producing 
 absolute ethanol works or not? I've been after a source of 20 litres 
 of castor oil here in Japan but I haven't found it yet. The method is 
 here:
 
 Separating Ethanol From Water Via Differential Miscibility -- using castor
 oil
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/eth_separate.html#castoil
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 Does not make too much sense.
 Andrew


 - Original Message -
 From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Derick Giorchino
 To: mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.orgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:01 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

 Hi Doug I am interested in the ethanol production you are using. 
 What is it can you point me in the right direction? Is it the acid 
 base as is explained at J.T.F.? As for the carb problems maybe a 
 marine carb is more tolerant of the alcohol fuel if not there are 
 places that could chrome or anodize the carb bowls for a price you 
 would need to re thread all the holes. Or maybe powder coating would 
 work.

 Good luck Derick


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lres1
 Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:03 AM
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol



 Would like to know the advantages if any of using Methanol instead 
 of Ethanol in making bio-diesel. It is very easy to make Ethanol 
 with down to 15% water. Seems kinda silly to make Ethanol and 
 Methanol if Ethanol will do all.



 Have now got a MPEFI Jeep running on 80% Ethanol and 20% water as a 
 straight injection. Have a few bugs to work out but total conversion 
 cost is less than 

Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

2006-09-05 Thread Derick Giorchino
Thanks for the response Keith. 
This is very good info for me. I do not wish to spend a lot of time trying
to do something that is close to imposable or just impractical.
When I could be out collecting U.V.O. or making bio d.
Would you have any idea what Doug is speeking of earlier in this post? 
He makes it sound like ethanol is easily done. I maybe reading into this
though. Derick.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bob allen
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:20 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

Derick, you are talking about cellolosic ethanol, that is ethanol made
from cellulose, rather than 
from starch.  This is the holy grail of ethanol production. Very small
amounts of ethanol can be 
made from sulfuric acid digestion of cellulose, but the yield is abysmal and
the cost high.  My 
position is it is not worth the time, trouble, and expense.  the problems
are manifold.  First is 
the fact that the lignin present, which binds the cellulose, is not easily
separable from the 
cellulose,and hydrolysis of cellulose to free the sugars is much more
difficult that that of starch, 
and finally the sugars released from cellulose fermentation are not easily
fermentable with yeast.
Big bucks have been spent trying to solve these problems since at least the
70's with little or no 
success.  Simply, if it were easy, it would be happening everywhere, as the
feedstock- cellulosic 
wastes-are abundant.


Derick Giorchino wrote:
 No Keith am not confused. I do make biodiesel. I use methanol and until
some
 one has a better way that's what I will use. I was asking about the
 production of ethanol to use in other family vehicles. 
 Since they are gas engines. I read on J.T.F. way back when I was starting
 the venture of bio. That ethanol can be made at home using wood chips
/paper
 and I think there may have been also a mention of dry grass and brush and
 breaking it down with sulfuric acid. But I would need to go back and read
it
 over. My quarry was as to the amount of yield verses raw product used per
 liter /gal or what ever.
 Thanks Derick.  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Addison
 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:40 AM
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol
 
 What are you people talking about?

 have you ever made any type of biofuel?
 Seems to me that you are confusing them all.
 Acid Base process and ethanol fuel?
 Methanol vs ethanol? It has sense in biodiesel production, but you are
 talking
 alcohol fuel for petroleum engines.
 
 Doug is being a bit confusing. He was talking about both ethanol fuel 
 in gasoline engines and using ethanol to make biodiesel. Gasoline 
 engines will run on 80% ethanol and 20% water (ie 160 proof) but to 
 make ethyl esters biodiesel the ethanol must be dry, and Doug doesn't 
 know how to make dry ethanol (absolute), he can't do better than 85% 
 ( you should be able to get 95% by distillation). So Doug's question 
 about ethanol vs methanol for making biodiesel doesn't make much 
 sense to me either. I don't think Doug has made biodiesel, or he 
 wouldn't ask anyway - ethanol biodiesel is difficult to make, not for 
 novices, not even when the ethanol is dry, methanol biodiesel is the 
 way to start. I don't think we know of any novices who've succeeded 
 with ethyl esters biodiesel. I don't know how Doug was planning to 
 make methanol, there's no small-scale backyard way of producing 
 methanol. He seems to think you can make it by treating sawdust with 
 concentrated acid, but that makes ethanol, not methanol. I also don't 
 understand the reference to the acid-base process for producing 
 ethanol, the acid-base process at JtF produces biodiesel, not 
 ethanol. Oh well.
 
 Has nobody yet discovered whether the castor oil method for producing 
 absolute ethanol works or not? I've been after a source of 20 litres 
 of castor oil here in Japan but I haven't found it yet. The method is 
 here:
 
 Separating Ethanol From Water Via Differential Miscibility -- using castor
 oil
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/eth_separate.html#castoil
 
 Best
 
 Keith
 
 Does not make too much sense.
 Andrew


 - Original Message -
 From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Derick Giorchino
 To: mailto:biofuel@sustainablelists.orgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:01 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Ethanol V's Methanol

 Hi Doug I am interested in the ethanol production you are using. 
 What is it can you point me in the right direction? Is it the acid 
 base as is explained at J.T.F.? As for the carb problems maybe a 
 marine carb is more tolerant of the alcohol fuel if not there are 
 places that could chrome or anodize the carb bowls for a price you 
 would need to re thread all the holes. Or maybe powder coating would 
 work.

 Good luck