Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil

2007-04-26 Thread Pagandai Pannirselvam

Hi ,
Keith

  Thank you bringing here the very important report

Residual biomass = Food+Fiber+Feed+Fertilizer+Fuel

Brazilian sugarcane distillery  is  also exploring very well the use of a
byproduct effluent of ethanol fermentation as an organic additive to soils.
This is also an example of the
innovations very well  to support residue removal , integrated very well
with the feed  , not yet for fiber, where as the solid residues India are
used for paper production.More recycling of the solid residues incorporated
with the effluent in Brazilian sugar cane field  is more  sustainable
compared to  India, where 10 times more chemical fertilizers , and also very
significant amount of the toxic chemicals , well promoted by the very big
blue companies, are used  and thus less sustainable, thus raw very less
green technology.The inoculated  microbes  as bio fertilizer also the other
approach well applied in Brazil, thus making very sucess for the sustainable
Brazilian biofuel project.

 Thus , the natural farming  is no more  out dated , yet  the best way
.This method need more recycle of solid residues for the soil , thus the
system can be more productive and also more sustainable.Thus  the recycle
can be more easy as fertilizer rather than the fuel production .

sd
Pannir, Brasil

2007/4/25, Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



From: ARS News Service [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:01:25 -0400

STORY LEAD:
In Producing Ethanol, Some Cornstalks Should be Left in the Field
___

ARS News Service
Agricultural Research Service, USDA
Don Comis, (301) 504-1625, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
April 25, 2007
--View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at
www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
___

If conservation of soil organic matter is taken into account, the
United States at best has to cut in half the amount of cornstalks
that can be harvested to produce ethanol, according to an
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) study.

Jane Johnson, a soil scientist with the ARS North Central Soil
Conservation Research Laboratory in Morris, Minn., found that twice
as many cornstalks have to be left in the field to maintain soil
organic matter levels, compared to the amount of stalks needed only
to prevent erosion.

This doesn't mean harvesting cornstalks for cellulosic ethanol isn't
feasible--just that when you add soil organic matter concerns to
erosion concerns, it slashes the amount of cornstalks available for
conversion to ethanol. For example, 213-bushel-per-acre corn yields
leave farmers an average four tons per acre of cornstalks after
harvest. Farmers could then harvest about two tons of cornstalks per
acre for conversion to ethanol--but only from land with low erosion
risks, using little or no tillage.

If the same farmers rotate with soybeans as recommended, they can
only remove half again as much biomass for ethanol production, or
just one ton per acre, to compensate for the lower biomass left by
soybeans.

Johnson's estimates are part of the Renewable Energy Assessment
Project (REAP), formally created in 2006, although she and a core
group of colleagues have worked on these measurements for several
years prior.

REAP was formed to ensure that cellulosic ethanol programs will be
sustainable. Most participants work with corn, but others work on
switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol. When cellulosic ethanol is made
from corn, it uses cornstalks as well as grain.

There are nine ARS locations participating in REAP in eight states,
from Alabama to Indiana to Oregon.

The new program also aims to compare the economic value of biomass
for bioenergy versus its value for storing soil carbon. REAP will
provide guidelines on harvesting biomass to corn farmers, land
managers, the biomass industry and action agencies.

Johnson also explored the use of a byproduct of ethanol fermentation
as an organic additive to soils. This is an example of the
innovations needed to support residue removal.

ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief in-house
scientific research agency.
___

This is one of the news reports that ARS Information distributes to
subscribers on weekdays. Send feedback and questions to the ARS News
Service at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* You are subscribed to ARS News as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To change the address, please notify the ARS News Service at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Other ARS news products are available by e-mail. For details about
them or to subscribe, please contact the ARS News Service or visit
http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/lists.htm.
__
ARS News Service, Information Staff, Agricultural Research Service
5601 Sunnyside Ave., Room 1-2251, Beltsville MD 20705-5128
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.ars.usda.gov/news
Phone (301) 504-1638 | fax (301) 504-1486



Re: [Biofuel] Jeep diesels

2007-04-26 Thread Michael Friebel
Air leaks occur regardless of the fuel.  However, a higher viscosity fuel may 
aggravate a leak already present.  Air leaks are a common problem in diesel 
fuel systems, which are often designed to suck rather than push fuel from the 
tank to the engine (because the lower volatility of diesel fuel allows it).  
Since the fuel line between the tank and lift pump is under vacuum rather than 
positive pressure, the entire section must be air-tight under that vacuum 
rather than merely fuel-tight.”  This means that slight imperfections in parts 
or connections that would be of no consequence in gasoline or other pressurized 
systems can result in leaks in diesel systems.  Air leaks are also notoriously 
difficult to troubleshoot.  This is because a leak can occur anywhere between 
the tank and pump, even in multiple locations with cumulative effect, and can 
cause a great range of symptoms, from hard starting to rough operation to 
intermittent and specific operational problems like mine.
  And, unlike pressurized systems, there is often no visual evidence of the 
defect itself because air is leaking in through minor imperfections rather than 
visible fuel leaking out.  
 
The lift pump of the 2.8L jeep liberty is incorporated into the design of the 
injection pump at the top, front of the engine.  Fuel is sucked up from the 
tank behind the rear axle, through the 3-micron filter at the top of the 
firewall, to the injection pump.  This includes something like 10 feet of line, 
six connections, and the filter assembly.  It wouldn't take much to cause a 
problem.  At least two owners on lostkjs.com have reported air leak problems 
caused by faulty fuel filter assemblies that resulted in hard start symptoms.  
A couple owners reported what at least seemed to be air leaks that caused rough 
operation symptoms, but I think only one of these had been verified and fixed.  
Some have wondered whether a seemingly common transmission bucking problem is 
really just an air leak problem.  This is as of January (last I checked in).
 
What you describe as the engine had no power and would not accelerate past 
45mph  Upon restart, she had no problem is exactly what happens when the 
computer goes into so-called limp mode.  It dramatically lowers power to the 
point that top speed is 40-45 mph and the tranny is limited to the first two 
gears (and all turbo whine disappears as a byproduct).  A number of sensed 
conditions can trigger limp mode and its purpose is to protect the engine  
drive train while allowing the driver to pull over or whatever.  Many folks 
really don't like it.  It can be a bit scary because so much power is lost so 
suddenly.  It can also mask the real symptoms that you might otherwise detect.  
Some have complained to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
in the hopes that chrysler is pressured to change the way the system functions. 
  
 
When my problem triggers limp mode, I can usually restart immediately and find 
that everything has returned to normal.  There have been a small number of 
instances in which the vehicle has remained in limp mode following restart.  
Shutting down again, waiting a minute or so, and then restarting has always 
brought things back to normal in these cases.  I don’t know exactly what is 
going on here, but I do know that how the computer responds to sensed 
conditions can vary.  For example, some abnormalities set hard codes 
immediately while others only trigger response while the particular condition 
is present (often until other parameters are met).  My problem has set a 
diagnostic code twice.  It seems that those instances in which normal operation 
didn’t immediately return happened while this code remained set, but I’m not 
certain this included every case.  Maybe the condition initially sensed by the 
computer simply remained.  
 
Anyway, what you describe could very well be an air leak.  My problem results 
in exactly what you describe.  It simply triggers limp mode without any other 
symptom or lasting effect except that the engine sometimes dies, which happens 
in approximately 25% of the occurrences.  As I said, it usually runs normally 
following restart and a code has only been triggered twice out of many 
occurrences.  And, although it obviously correlates with high throttle use in 
my case, it has always behaved very intermittently.  There have been times when 
I couldn't make it happen for several weeks on end and other times in which it 
would happen with anything more than moderate acceleration.  
 
I would first check for the presence of air in the fuel system by bleeding it.  
The bleed screw is on the top of the fuel filter mount.  I happen to know that 
the torque spec is 96 in/lbs...  In case a reader doesn’t know, take a length 
of 1/4 clear tubing, slip one end over the bleed screw and put the other end 
into some sort of container.  Pump the primer button until it firms up 
completely.  It’ll take up to a dozen or so 

Re: [Biofuel] Patented GMO jatropha

2007-04-26 Thread James Quaid

Keith,

I'm doing a Jatropha cultivation experiment in AZ. It survived the 115F. 
But the 24F killed a 1/3 of my test planting. It is very sensitive to a 
hard freeze. And according to what I've read, standard breeds will 
produce 300 gal/ acre 600 gal/acre if it blooms twice. Jatropha 
originally from Central America. I'd be very interested to see what the 
GMO stuff does especially in cold climes.


I'm having a heckuva time sprouting seedlings. The current batch of 
seeds I have is from Suriname. We will be doing an acre test planting on 
a farm with saline wells. Jatropha can allegedly handle salt pretty well.


Here's what the Germans are doing with it: http://www.d1plc.com

Regards,
JQ

Keith Addison wrote:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-biodiesel1707apr17,0,4223949.story? 
track=mostemailedlink

'Farming our fuel'
Officials from a local company will tout the jatropha plant today in 
Tallahassee. We're doing things right here in Orlando that are going 
to change America.


Rich Mckay | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted April 17, 2007

ABOUT BIODIESEL
What is it?
Biodiesel is a fuel made from rendered vegetable oils or animal fats 
refined through a chemical reaction with an alcohol.

What can be used to make it?
Soybean oil is used to make most of the biodiesel in the U.S. 
Restaurant grease or any vegetable oil such as corn, canola, 
cottonseed, mustard oil also can be used. Jatropha oil is widely used 
in India and Asia. Other companies are developing ways to make 
biodiesel out of algae, restaurant scraps and even animal carcasses.

Why bother?
Biodiesel is considered an alternative to petroleum diesel because it 
can be grown, rather than pumped from a well. It is also considered a 
neutral gas. It doesn't put back into the atmosphere anything it 
didn't absorb when it was part of the environment.

Is it as powerful as diesel?
It is considered to have the same power as petroleum diesel.
What engines can use it?
It can be mixed with petroleum diesel and used in unmodified diesel 
engines. Engines can be modified to run 100 percent on biodiesel.

What does biodiesel smell like?
That depends its source. Some say it smells like french fries. 
Biodiesel made from jatropha doesn't have a strong odor.

SOURCE: Sentinel research
 
America, meet your next tank of gas -- made from superpowered seeds.


A couple of Orlando entrepreneurs say that a Malaysian variety newly 
approved for U.S. import could help solve America's energy woes and 
boost Central Florida's economy with a new cash crop.


State Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson, along with executives 
from the Orlando-based Xenerga Inc., are scheduled to introduce a 
patented version of the jatropha plant today in Tallahassee.


We're doing things right here in Orlando that are going to change 
America, said Dave Jarrett, a company spokesman. Just wait and see.


The oil pressed from the jatropha nut can be used to make biodiesel, 
producing six to eight times the amount of energy extracted from 
soybeans -- the most common crop used for biodiesel in the U.S.


Xenerga president Jason Sayers and his business partner Victor Clewes 
have the exclusive patent on the high-octane version of the plant 
with seeds that grow inside bunches of fat green pods the size of 
peach pits.


It can produce 1,600 gallons of biodiesel per acre, compared with 
soy's 200 gallons, Sayers said.


A Lake Wales farmer is ready to grow 5,000 acres of the genetically 
enhanced jatropha, Jarrett said. And unlike soy, which takes lots of 
tending, fertilizer and water, the jatropha plant can grow happily in 
arid soil, with little water and almost no tending.


Think of it as farming our fuel, Sayers said.

President Bush mandated that refineries should have renewable fuels 
blended into 7.5 billion gallons of the nation's fuel supply by 2012.


Only about 75 million gallons of biodiesel were sold in the U.S. last 
year, compared with about 6 billion gallons of petroleum diesel, 
according to the National Biodiesel Board, a trade organization.


Biodiesel is huge in Europe and Asia, Sayers said. America is just 
now catching up.


So Sayers and his associates are also launching a venture with 
Xenerga that will sell prefabricated mom-and-pop biodiesel refineries 
for about $2 million.


Their plan is to sell turnkey operations, manufactured in Germany and 
shipped here, and promise a steady supply of raw materials and 
customers. They have contracts to build about 16 of the refineries. 
Each refinery, if running at capacity, can produce 5 million gallons 
of biodiesel a year. Jarrett said they already have a slew of 
inquiries and expect to have 100 refineries throughout the country up 
and running in 18 months.


Besides the jatropha nut, his other sources will include a plentiful 
supply of restaurant grease. Through Sayers' other business, 
FiltaFry, which cleans restaurant fryers, he spotted a potential 
energy source in leftover grease.


The National Biodiesel 

Re: [Biofuel] Patented GMO jatropha

2007-04-26 Thread Joe Street
You should plant only heirloom varieties of ANY plant.  BTW seeds should 
sprout easily given the right conditions otherwise nature would not have 
produced them or rather they would not have survived over time.  This 
difficulty should be warning you of something.


Joe

James Quaid wrote:


Keith,

I'm doing a Jatropha cultivation experiment in AZ.  It survived the 
115F.  But the 24F killed a 1/3 of my test planting.  It is very 
sensitive to a hard freeze.  And according to what I've read, standard 
breeds will produce 300 gal/ acre 600 gal/acre if it blooms twice.  
Jatropha originally from  Central America.   I'd be very interested to 
see what the GMO stuff does especially in cold climes.


I'm having a heckuva time sprouting seedlings.  The current batch of 
seeds I have is from Suriname.   We will be doing an acre test 
planting on a farm with saline wells.  Jatropha can allegedly handle 
salt pretty well.


Here's what the Germans are doing with it: http://www.d1plc.com

Regards,
JQ

Keith Addison wrote:

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-biodiesel1707apr17,0,4223949.story? 
track=mostemailedlink

'Farming our fuel'
Officials from a local company will tout the jatropha plant today in 
Tallahassee. We're doing things right here in Orlando that are going 
to change America.


Rich Mckay | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted April 17, 2007

ABOUT BIODIESEL
What is it?
Biodiesel is a fuel made from rendered vegetable oils or animal fats 
refined through a chemical reaction with an alcohol.

What can be used to make it?
Soybean oil is used to make most of the biodiesel in the U.S. 
Restaurant grease or any vegetable oil such as corn, canola, 
cottonseed, mustard oil also can be used. Jatropha oil is widely used 
in India and Asia. Other companies are developing ways to make 
biodiesel out of algae, restaurant scraps and even animal carcasses.

Why bother?
Biodiesel is considered an alternative to petroleum diesel because it 
can be grown, rather than pumped from a well. It is also considered a 
neutral gas. It doesn't put back into the atmosphere anything it 
didn't absorb when it was part of the environment.

Is it as powerful as diesel?
It is considered to have the same power as petroleum diesel.
What engines can use it?
It can be mixed with petroleum diesel and used in unmodified diesel 
engines. Engines can be modified to run 100 percent on biodiesel.

What does biodiesel smell like?
That depends its source. Some say it smells like french fries. 
Biodiesel made from jatropha doesn't have a strong odor.

SOURCE: Sentinel research

America, meet your next tank of gas -- made from superpowered seeds.

A couple of Orlando entrepreneurs say that a Malaysian variety newly 
approved for U.S. import could help solve America's energy woes and 
boost Central Florida's economy with a new cash crop.


State Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson, along with executives 
from the Orlando-based Xenerga Inc., are scheduled to introduce a 
patented version of the jatropha plant today in Tallahassee.


We're doing things right here in Orlando that are going to change 
America, said Dave Jarrett, a company spokesman. Just wait and see.


The oil pressed from the jatropha nut can be used to make biodiesel, 
producing six to eight times the amount of energy extracted from 
soybeans -- the most common crop used for biodiesel in the U.S.


Xenerga president Jason Sayers and his business partner Victor Clewes 
have the exclusive patent on the high-octane version of the plant 
with seeds that grow inside bunches of fat green pods the size of 
peach pits.


It can produce 1,600 gallons of biodiesel per acre, compared with 
soy's 200 gallons, Sayers said.


A Lake Wales farmer is ready to grow 5,000 acres of the genetically 
enhanced jatropha, Jarrett said. And unlike soy, which takes lots of 
tending, fertilizer and water, the jatropha plant can grow happily in 
arid soil, with little water and almost no tending.


Think of it as farming our fuel, Sayers said.

President Bush mandated that refineries should have renewable fuels 
blended into 7.5 billion gallons of the nation's fuel supply by 2012.


Only about 75 million gallons of biodiesel were sold in the U.S. last 
year, compared with about 6 billion gallons of petroleum diesel, 
according to the National Biodiesel Board, a trade organization.


Biodiesel is huge in Europe and Asia, Sayers said. America is just 
now catching up.


So Sayers and his associates are also launching a venture with 
Xenerga that will sell prefabricated mom-and-pop biodiesel refineries 
for about $2 million.


Their plan is to sell turnkey operations, manufactured in Germany and 
shipped here, and promise a steady supply of raw materials and 
customers. They have contracts to build about 16 of the refineries. 
Each refinery, if running at capacity, can produce 5 million gallons 
of biodiesel a year. Jarrett said they already have a slew of 
inquiries and expect to have 100 refineries throughout 

Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil

2007-04-26 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Pannir

Hi ,
Keith

   Thank you bringing here the very important report

 Residual biomass = Food+Fiber+Feed+Fertilizer+Fuel

Brazilian sugarcane distillery  is  also exploring very well the use 
of a byproduct effluent of ethanol fermentation as an organic 
additive to soils. This is also an example of the
innovations very well  to support residue removal , integrated very 
well with the feed  , not yet for fiber, where as the solid residues 
India are used for paper production.More recycling of the solid 
residues incorporated with the effluent in Brazilian sugar cane 
field  is more  sustainable compared to  India, where 10 times more 
chemical fertilizers , and also very significant amount of the toxic 
chemicals , well promoted by the very big blue companies, are used 
and thus less sustainable, thus raw very less green technology.The 
inoculated  microbes  as bio fertilizer also the other approach well 
applied in Brazil, thus making very sucess for the sustainable 
Brazilian biofuel project.

  Thus , the natural farming  is no more  out dated , yet  the best 
way .This method need more recycle of solid residues for the soil , 
thus the system can be more productive and also more 
sustainable.Thus  the recycle can be more easy as fertilizer rather 
than the fuel production .

Quite so.

Interesting that J.I. Rodale wrote about essentially the same problem in 1946:

http://journeytoforever.org/farm_library/paydirt/paydirt_3b.html
Pay Dirt - Part 3b

Scroll down to Chemurgy.

Also, applying Albert Howard's work in the 1920s with the development 
in India of the Indore composting system (the foundation stone of 
organic farming), corn farmers could maintain soil fertility, and in 
fact improve it, if they composted only a quarter as much of the 
residue ARS says should be left, and took the rest away for ethanol 
production. Once, that is, ethanol from cellulose becomes a reality 
instead of just a dream.

To make it truly sustainable though the missing livestock have to be 
returned to the picture rather than the entirely dumb and destructive 
current system of pumping up the corn with chemicals while massive 
manure lagoons fester on the other side of the state. It must be 
integrated.

I completely agree with you, true natural farming will never be outdated.

All best

Keith


 sd
Pannir, Brasil

2007/4/25, Keith Addison mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 From: ARS News Service mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil
 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:01:25 -0400
 
 STORY LEAD:
 In Producing Ethanol, Some Cornstalks Should be Left in the Field
 ___
 
 ARS News Service
 Agricultural Research Service, USDA
 Don Comis, (301) 504-1625, 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 April 25, 2007
 --View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at
 http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/prwww.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
 ___
 
 If conservation of soil organic matter is taken into account, the
 United States at best has to cut in half the amount of cornstalks
 that can be harvested to produce ethanol, according to an
 Agricultural Research Service (ARS) study.
 
 Jane Johnson, a soil scientist with the ARS North Central Soil
 Conservation Research Laboratory in Morris, Minn., found that twice
 as many cornstalks have to be left in the field to maintain soil
 organic matter levels, compared to the amount of stalks needed only
 to prevent erosion.
 
 This doesn#39;t mean harvesting cornstalks for cellulosic ethanol isn#39;t
 feasible--just that when you add soil organic matter concerns to
 erosion concerns, it slashes the amount of cornstalks available for
 conversion to ethanol. For example, 213-bushel-per-acre corn yields
 leave farmers an average four tons per acre of cornstalks after
 harvest. Farmers could then harvest about two tons of cornstalks per
 acre for conversion to ethanol--but only from land with low erosion
 risks, using little or no tillage.
 
 If the same farmers rotate with soybeans as recommended, they can
 only remove half again as much biomass for ethanol production, or
 just one ton per acre, to compensate for the lower biomass left by
 soybeans.
 
 Johnson#39;s estimates are part of the Renewable Energy Assessment
 Project (REAP), formally created in 2006, although she and a core
 group of colleagues have worked on these measurements for several
 years prior.
 
 REAP was formed to ensure that cellulosic ethanol programs will be
 sustainable. Most participants work with corn, but others work on
 switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol. When cellulosic ethanol is made
 from corn, it uses cornstalks as well as grain.
 
 There are nine ARS locations participating in REAP in eight states,
 from Alabama to Indiana to Oregon.
 
 The new program also aims to compare the economic value of biomass
 for bioenergy versus its value for storing soil carbon. REAP will
 

Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil

2007-04-26 Thread Joe Street

Hey Pagandai;

Do you know about the International Permaculture Conference (IPC8) which 
is happening in Sao Paulo on May 4th?  Bill Mollison the inventer of 
permaculture will give a course on design and many other leading 
speakers of the world will present.  I wish I could attend.


http://www.ipc8.org/index.php?option=com_frontpageItemid=1

Cheers
Joe

Pagandai Pannirselvam wrote:


 Hi ,
Keith

   Thank you bringing here the very important report

 Residual biomass = Food+Fiber+Feed+Fertilizer+Fuel

Brazilian sugarcane distillery  is  also exploring very well the use 
of a byproduct effluent of ethanol fermentation as an organic additive 
to soils. This is also an example of the
innovations very well  to support residue removal , integrated very 
well with the feed  , not yet for fiber, where as the solid residues 
India are used for paper production.More recycling of the solid 
residues incorporated with the effluent in Brazilian sugar cane field  
is more  sustainable compared to  India, where 10 times more chemical 
fertilizers , and also very significant amount of the toxic chemicals 
, well promoted by the very big blue companies, are used  and thus 
less sustainable, thus raw very less green technology.The inoculated  
microbes  as bio fertilizer also the other approach well applied in 
Brazil, thus making very sucess for the sustainable Brazilian biofuel 
project.


  Thus , the natural farming  is no more  out dated , yet  the best 
way .This method need more recycle of solid residues for the soil , 
thus the system can be more productive and also more sustainable.Thus  
the recycle can be more easy as fertilizer rather than the fuel 
production .


 sd
Pannir, Brasil

2007/4/25, Keith Addison  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:



From: ARS News Service  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:01:25 -0400

STORY LEAD:
In Producing Ethanol, Some Cornstalks Should be Left in the Field
___

ARS News Service
Agricultural Research Service, USDA
Don Comis, (301) 504-1625, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
April 25, 2007
--View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at
www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
___

If conservation of soil organic matter is taken into account, the
United States at best has to cut in half the amount of cornstalks
that can be harvested to produce ethanol, according to an
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) study.

Jane Johnson, a soil scientist with the ARS North Central Soil
Conservation Research Laboratory in Morris, Minn., found that twice
as many cornstalks have to be left in the field to maintain soil
organic matter levels, compared to the amount of stalks needed only
to prevent erosion.

This doesn't mean harvesting cornstalks for cellulosic ethanol isn't
feasible--just that when you add soil organic matter concerns to
erosion concerns, it slashes the amount of cornstalks available for
conversion to ethanol. For example, 213-bushel-per-acre corn yields
leave farmers an average four tons per acre of cornstalks after
harvest. Farmers could then harvest about two tons of cornstalks per
acre for conversion to ethanol--but only from land with low erosion
risks, using little or no tillage.

If the same farmers rotate with soybeans as recommended, they can
only remove half again as much biomass for ethanol production, or
just one ton per acre, to compensate for the lower biomass left by
soybeans.

Johnson's estimates are part of the Renewable Energy Assessment
Project (REAP), formally created in 2006, although she and a core
group of colleagues have worked on these measurements for several
years prior.

REAP was formed to ensure that cellulosic ethanol programs will be
sustainable. Most participants work with corn, but others work on
switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol. When cellulosic ethanol is made
from corn, it uses cornstalks as well as grain.

There are nine ARS locations participating in REAP in eight states,
from Alabama to Indiana to Oregon.

The new program also aims to compare the economic value of biomass
for bioenergy versus its value for storing soil carbon. REAP will
provide guidelines on harvesting biomass to corn farmers, land
managers, the biomass industry and action agencies.

Johnson also explored the use of a byproduct of ethanol fermentation
as an organic additive to soils. This is an example of the
innovations needed to support residue removal.

ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief in-house
scientific research agency.
___


Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil

2007-04-26 Thread Sivaramakrishnan Ananthakrishnan
Hi,

 FYI, Pongamia seed residue after oil extraction is also used as manure in 
India.
 I find usage of the same in home garden also quite effective.

Best regards,
Am. Sivaramakrishnan


- Original Message 
From: Pagandai Pannirselvam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 4:24:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil

 Hi ,
Keith

   Thank you bringing here the very important report

 Residual biomass = Food+Fiber+Feed+Fertilizer+Fuel

Brazilian sugarcane distillery  is  also exploring very well the use of a 
byproduct effluent of ethanol fermentation as an organic additive to soils. 
This is also an example of the 
innovations very well  to support residue removal , integrated very well with 
the feed  , not yet for fiber, where as the solid residues India are used for 
paper production.More recycling of the solid residues incorporated with the 
effluent in Brazilian sugar cane field  is more  sustainable compared to  
India, where 10 times more chemical fertilizers , and also very significant 
amount of the toxic chemicals , well promoted by the very big blue companies, 
are used  and thus less sustainable, thus raw very less green technology.The 
inoculated  microbes  as bio fertilizer also the other approach well applied in 
Brazil, thus making very sucess for the sustainable Brazilian biofuel project.

  Thus , the natural farming  is no more  out dated , yet  the best way .This 
method need more recycle of solid residues for the soil , thus the system can 
be more productive and also more sustainable.Thus  the recycle can be more easy 
as fertilizer rather than the fuel production .

 sd 
Pannir, Brasil


2007/4/25, Keith Addison  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

From: ARS News Service  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:01:25 -0400

STORY LEAD:
In Producing Ethanol, Some Cornstalks Should be Left in the Field 
___

ARS News Service
Agricultural Research Service, USDA
Don Comis, (301) 504-1625, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
April 25, 2007
--View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at
www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
___ 

If conservation of soil organic matter is taken into account, the
United States at best has to cut in half the amount of cornstalks
that can be harvested to produce ethanol, according to an
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) study.

Jane Johnson, a soil scientist with the ARS North Central Soil
Conservation Research Laboratory in Morris, Minn., found that twice
as many cornstalks have to be left in the field to maintain soil 
organic matter levels, compared to the amount of stalks needed only
to prevent erosion.

This doesn't mean harvesting cornstalks for cellulosic ethanol isn't
feasible--just that when you add soil organic matter concerns to 
erosion concerns, it slashes the amount of cornstalks available for
conversion to ethanol. For example, 213-bushel-per-acre corn yields
leave farmers an average four tons per acre of cornstalks after 
harvest. Farmers could then harvest about two tons of cornstalks per
acre for conversion to ethanol--but only from land with low erosion
risks, using little or no tillage.

If the same farmers rotate with soybeans as recommended, they can 
only remove half again as much biomass for ethanol production, or
just one ton per acre, to compensate for the lower biomass left by
soybeans.

Johnson's estimates are part of the Renewable Energy Assessment 
Project (REAP), formally created in 2006, although she and a core
group of colleagues have worked on these measurements for several
years prior.

REAP was formed to ensure that cellulosic ethanol programs will be 
sustainable. Most participants work with corn, but others work on
switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol. When cellulosic ethanol is made
from corn, it uses cornstalks as well as grain.

There are nine ARS locations participating in REAP in eight states, 
from Alabama to Indiana to Oregon.

The new program also aims to compare the economic value of biomass
for bioenergy versus its value for storing soil carbon. REAP will
provide guidelines on harvesting biomass to corn farmers, land 
managers, the biomass industry and action agencies.

Johnson also explored the use of a byproduct of ethanol fermentation
as an organic additive to soils. This is an example of the
innovations needed to support residue removal. 

ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief in-house
scientific research agency.
___

This is one of the news reports that ARS Information distributes to 
subscribers on weekdays. Send feedback and questions to the ARS News
Service at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* You are subscribed to ARS News as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To change the address, please notify the ARS News Service at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
* To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 

Re: [Biofuel] bee followup

2007-04-26 Thread Chip Mefford
Mike Weaver wrote:
 In the US, all Organic means, thanks to congress, is that the labell 
 says Organic.  It has no real value.  It's to make you feel better.
SNIP

That's not completely true Mike.

Have a friend who certifies organic farms,
and tracks organic certification compliance
for a living.

It is a far less than trivial task.

Now, as to the label 'Organic' you may be
correct, as I don't know what that label
means. But a usda certified organic farm
did a lot more than file some paperwork.
They worked for it.

You can learn more here;
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/indexNet.htm


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] bee followup

2007-04-26 Thread john
Well, since the true meaning of the basic work organic is anything animal or 
vegetable, almost any food stuff can be labelled organic.

Does the lable say Certified Organic 

John

Quoting Chip Mefford [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Mike Weaver wrote:
  In the US, all Organic means, thanks to congress, is that the labell 
  says Organic.  It has no real value.  It's to make you feel better.
 SNIP
 
 That's not completely true Mike.
 
 Have a friend who certifies organic farms,
 and tracks organic certification compliance
 for a living.
 
 It is a far less than trivial task.
 
 Now, as to the label 'Organic' you may be
 correct, as I don't know what that label
 means. But a usda certified organic farm
 did a lot more than file some paperwork.
 They worked for it.
 
 You can learn more here;
 http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/indexNet.htm
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] bee followup

2007-04-26 Thread Mike Weaver
I'm sure the truth is somewhere in between - I think I'm leery of 
USDA-approved because of all the loopholes - for instance your cattle 
must be feed natural non-GMO, non-chemically-laded feed, unless of 
course you think that's too expensive, then you can feed cattle toxic 
sludge pellets and still market the meat as organic.  Also, the SCC read 
in even organic milk is often quite high.  I don't want to drink baked 
pus, which can be 10% of the volume of milk.  Yechh.

Chip Mefford wrote:

Mike Weaver wrote:
  

In the US, all Organic means, thanks to congress, is that the labell 
says Organic.  It has no real value.  It's to make you feel better.


SNIP

That's not completely true Mike.

Have a friend who certifies organic farms,
and tracks organic certification compliance
for a living.

It is a far less than trivial task.

Now, as to the label 'Organic' you may be
correct, as I don't know what that label
means. But a usda certified organic farm
did a lot more than file some paperwork.
They worked for it.

You can learn more here;
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/indexNet.htm


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Fireball fusion reactor..what ever happened to

2007-04-26 Thread AltEnergyNetwork


Fireball fusion reactor..what ever happened to
http://www.alternate-energy.net/lab_fireball07.swf








Get your daily alternative energy news

Alternate Energy Resource Network
1000+ news sources-resources
  updated daily

http://www.alternate-energy.net





Next_Generation_Grid

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid


Alternative_Energy_Politics

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics


Tomorrow-energy

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy


Earth_Rescue_International

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Earth_Rescue_International



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] bee followup

2007-04-26 Thread Kirk McLoren
Gotta raise your own. I know I know - cant leave syphilization and move to the 
country.
  Or can you?
   
  Kirk

Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm sure the truth is somewhere in between - I think I'm leery of 
USDA-approved because of all the loopholes - for instance your cattle 
must be feed natural non-GMO, non-chemically-laded feed, unless of 
course you think that's too expensive, then you can feed cattle toxic 
sludge pellets and still market the meat as organic. Also, the SCC read 
in even organic milk is often quite high. I don't want to drink baked 
pus, which can be 10% of the volume of milk. Yechh.

Chip Mefford wrote:

Mike Weaver wrote:
 

In the US, all Organic means, thanks to congress, is that the labell 
says Organic. It has no real value. It's to make you feel better.
 

SNIP

That's not completely true Mike.

Have a friend who certifies organic farms,
and tracks organic certification compliance
for a living.

It is a far less than trivial task.

Now, as to the label 'Organic' you may be
correct, as I don't know what that label
means. But a usda certified organic farm
did a lot more than file some paperwork.
They worked for it.

You can learn more here;
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/indexNet.htm


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



   
-
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible new car smell?
 Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil

2007-04-26 Thread doug
Hi, 
 Bill Mollison would not rate himself as the 'inventor' of permaculture. He 
has merely made us all aware that nature is worth nurturing,  natural 
systems will reach a type of balance.
 Bill Mollison may be the inventor of the term 'Permaculture' but the 
inventors are the myriad generations of Peasant farmers on which his system 
is based.
 I think you will find he is a very humble man. He has done many great things, 
re-introducing sustainable agriculture to many people. Please see him, meet 
him  learn!

regards Doug

On Friday 27 April 2007 12:18:02 am Joe Street wrote:
 Hey Pagandai;

 Do you know about the International Permaculture Conference (IPC8) which
 is happening in Sao Paulo on May 4th?  Bill Mollison the inventer of
 permaculture will give a course on design and many other leading
 speakers of the world will present.  I wish I could attend.

 http://www.ipc8.org/index.php?option=com_frontpageItemid=1

 Cheers
 Joe

 Pagandai Pannirselvam wrote:
   Hi ,
  Keith
 
 Thank you bringing here the very important report
 
   Residual biomass = Food+Fiber+Feed+Fertilizer+Fuel
 
  Brazilian sugarcane distillery  is  also exploring very well the use
  of a byproduct effluent of ethanol fermentation as an organic additive
  to soils. This is also an example of the
  innovations very well  to support residue removal , integrated very
  well with the feed  , not yet for fiber, where as the solid residues
  India are used for paper production.More recycling of the solid
  residues incorporated with the effluent in Brazilian sugar cane field
  is more  sustainable compared to  India, where 10 times more chemical
  fertilizers , and also very significant amount of the toxic chemicals
  , well promoted by the very big blue companies, are used  and thus
  less sustainable, thus raw very less green technology.The inoculated
  microbes  as bio fertilizer also the other approach well applied in
  Brazil, thus making very sucess for the sustainable Brazilian biofuel
  project.
 
Thus , the natural farming  is no more  out dated , yet  the best
  way .This method need more recycle of solid residues for the soil ,
  thus the system can be more productive and also more sustainable.Thus
  the recycle can be more easy as fertilizer rather than the fuel
  production .
 
   sd
  Pannir, Brasil
 
  2007/4/25, Keith Addison  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  From: ARS News Service  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Subject: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil
  Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:01:25 -0400
  
  STORY LEAD:
  In Producing Ethanol, Some Cornstalks Should be Left in the Field
  ___
  
  ARS News Service
  Agricultural Research Service, USDA
  Don Comis, (301) 504-1625, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  April 25, 2007
  --View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at
  www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
  ___
  
  If conservation of soil organic matter is taken into account, the
  United States at best has to cut in half the amount of cornstalks
  that can be harvested to produce ethanol, according to an
  Agricultural Research Service (ARS) study.
  
  Jane Johnson, a soil scientist with the ARS North Central Soil
  Conservation Research Laboratory in Morris, Minn., found that twice
  as many cornstalks have to be left in the field to maintain soil
  organic matter levels, compared to the amount of stalks needed only
  to prevent erosion.
  
  This doesn't mean harvesting cornstalks for cellulosic ethanol isn't
  feasible--just that when you add soil organic matter concerns to
  erosion concerns, it slashes the amount of cornstalks available for
  conversion to ethanol. For example, 213-bushel-per-acre corn yields
  leave farmers an average four tons per acre of cornstalks after
  harvest. Farmers could then harvest about two tons of cornstalks per
  acre for conversion to ethanol--but only from land with low erosion
  risks, using little or no tillage.
  
  If the same farmers rotate with soybeans as recommended, they can
  only remove half again as much biomass for ethanol production, or
  just one ton per acre, to compensate for the lower biomass left by
  soybeans.
  
  Johnson's estimates are part of the Renewable Energy Assessment
  Project (REAP), formally created in 2006, although she and a core
  group of colleagues have worked on these measurements for several
  years prior.
  
  REAP was formed to ensure that cellulosic ethanol programs will be
  sustainable. Most participants work with corn, but others work on
  switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol. When cellulosic ethanol is made
  from corn, it uses cornstalks as well 

Re: [Biofuel] Fwd: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil

2007-04-26 Thread Joe Street
Good point Doug.  Actually the kudos go to Mother nature I guess.  Isn't 
permaculture just an immitation of what nature figured out for itself?


Joe

doug wrote:

Hi, 
Bill Mollison would not rate himself as the 'inventor' of permaculture. He 
has merely made us all aware that nature is worth nurturing,  natural 
systems will reach a type of balance.
Bill Mollison may be the inventor of the term 'Permaculture' but the 
inventors are the myriad generations of Peasant farmers on which his system 
is based.
I think you will find he is a very humble man. He has done many great things, 
re-introducing sustainable agriculture to many people. Please see him, meet 
him  learn!


regards Doug

On Friday 27 April 2007 12:18:02 am Joe Street wrote:
 


Hey Pagandai;

Do you know about the International Permaculture Conference (IPC8) which
is happening in Sao Paulo on May 4th?  Bill Mollison the inventer of
permaculture will give a course on design and many other leading
speakers of the world will present.  I wish I could attend.

http://www.ipc8.org/index.php?option=com_frontpageItemid=1

Cheers
Joe

Pagandai Pannirselvam wrote:
   


Hi ,
Keith

  Thank you bringing here the very important report

Residual biomass = Food+Fiber+Feed+Fertilizer+Fuel

Brazilian sugarcane distillery  is  also exploring very well the use
of a byproduct effluent of ethanol fermentation as an organic additive
to soils. This is also an example of the
innovations very well  to support residue removal , integrated very
well with the feed  , not yet for fiber, where as the solid residues
India are used for paper production.More recycling of the solid
residues incorporated with the effluent in Brazilian sugar cane field
is more  sustainable compared to  India, where 10 times more chemical
fertilizers , and also very significant amount of the toxic chemicals
, well promoted by the very big blue companies, are used  and thus
less sustainable, thus raw very less green technology.The inoculated
microbes  as bio fertilizer also the other approach well applied in
Brazil, thus making very sucess for the sustainable Brazilian biofuel
project.

 Thus , the natural farming  is no more  out dated , yet  the best
way .This method need more recycle of solid residues for the soil ,
thus the system can be more productive and also more sustainable.Thus
the recycle can be more easy as fertilizer rather than the fuel
production .

sd
Pannir, Brasil

2007/4/25, Keith Addison  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   From: ARS News Service  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Subject: Producing Ethanol--and Conserving the Soil
   Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:01:25 -0400
   
   STORY LEAD:
   In Producing Ethanol, Some Cornstalks Should be Left in the Field
   ___
   
   ARS News Service
   Agricultural Research Service, USDA
   Don Comis, (301) 504-1625, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   April 25, 2007
   --View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at
   www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
   ___
   
   If conservation of soil organic matter is taken into account, the
   United States at best has to cut in half the amount of cornstalks
   that can be harvested to produce ethanol, according to an
   Agricultural Research Service (ARS) study.
   
   Jane Johnson, a soil scientist with the ARS North Central Soil
   Conservation Research Laboratory in Morris, Minn., found that twice
   as many cornstalks have to be left in the field to maintain soil
   organic matter levels, compared to the amount of stalks needed only
   to prevent erosion.
   
   This doesn't mean harvesting cornstalks for cellulosic ethanol isn't
   feasible--just that when you add soil organic matter concerns to
   erosion concerns, it slashes the amount of cornstalks available for
   conversion to ethanol. For example, 213-bushel-per-acre corn yields
   leave farmers an average four tons per acre of cornstalks after
   harvest. Farmers could then harvest about two tons of cornstalks per
   acre for conversion to ethanol--but only from land with low erosion
   risks, using little or no tillage.
   
   If the same farmers rotate with soybeans as recommended, they can
   only remove half again as much biomass for ethanol production, or
   just one ton per acre, to compensate for the lower biomass left by
   soybeans.
   
   Johnson's estimates are part of the Renewable Energy Assessment
   Project (REAP), formally created in 2006, although she and a core
   group of colleagues have worked on these measurements for several
   years prior.
   
   REAP was formed to ensure that cellulosic ethanol programs will be
   sustainable. Most participants work with corn, but others work on
   switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol. When cellulosic ethanol is made
   from corn, it uses cornstalks as well as grain.
   
   There are nine ARS locations participating in 

Re: [Biofuel] bee followup

2007-04-26 Thread Mike Weaver
If only...

Kirk McLoren wrote:

 Gotta raise your own. I know I know - cant leave syphilization and 
 move to the country.
 Or can you?
  
 Kirk

 */Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

 I'm sure the truth is somewhere in between - I think I'm leery of
 USDA-approved because of all the loopholes - for instance your
 cattle
 must be feed natural non-GMO, non-chemically-laded feed, unless of
 course you think that's too expensive, then you can feed cattle toxic
 sludge pellets and still market the meat as organic. Also, the SCC
 read
 in even organic milk is often quite high. I don't want to drink baked
 pus, which can be 10% of the volume of milk. Yechh.

 Chip Mefford wrote:

 Mike Weaver wrote:
 
 
 In the US, all Organic means, thanks to congress, is that the
 labell
 says Organic. It has no real value. It's to make you feel better.
 
 
 SNIP
 
 That's not completely true Mike.
 
 Have a friend who certifies organic farms,
 and tracks organic certification compliance
 for a living.
 
 It is a far less than trivial task.
 
 Now, as to the label 'Organic' you may be
 correct, as I don't know what that label
 means. But a usda certified organic farm
 did a lot more than file some paperwork.
 They worked for it.
 
 You can learn more here;
 http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/indexNet.htm
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives
 (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 
 Ahhh...imagining that irresistible new car smell?
 Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos. 
 http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM-
  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] First Successful Demonstration of CO2 Capture Technology

2007-04-26 Thread Mike Weaver
/Global Research Technologies, LLC (GRT), a technology research and 
development company, and Klaus Lackner from Columbia University have 
achieved the successful demonstration of a bold new technology to 
capture carbon from the air http://www.physorg.com/news96732819.html. 
The air extraction prototype has successfully demonstrated that indeed 
carbon dioxide (CO2) can be captured from the atmosphere. This is GRT's 
first step toward a commercially viable air capture device./

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] [Fwd: Ontario goes solar - Toronto Star - 2007.04.26]

2007-04-26 Thread Darryl McMahon
 Original Message 

Ontario goes solar; Massive Sarnia 'farm' to lead North America in
harnessing sun's power
The Toronto Star
Thu 26 Apr 2007
Page: A01
Section: News
Byline: Tyler Hamilton
Source: Toronto Star
Edition: Met
Length: 983 words
The Ontario government has given approval for a
California company to construct a massive solar
farm near Sarnia that will blanket an area larger
than all three Toronto islands with hundreds of
thousands of sun-soaking panels.
It will be the largest solar power station in North
America and among the most expansive in the world
to use photovoltaic cells that produce electricity when
exposed to sunlight. Once complete, the 40-megawatt
Sarnia project will be able to supply enough
emission-free electricity to power between 10,000
and 15, 000 homes on sunny days.
This is certainly the most exciting thing I've ever
worked on, said Peter Carrie of OptiSolar Farms
Canada Inc., a subsidiary of Hayward, Calif.-based
OptiSolar Inc. We want to take solar mainstream.
The Ontario Power Authority has agreed to purchase
the electricity under a 20-year contract that will see
the clean power go into the provincial grid. An
official announcement is expected today from the
energy ministry.
The current world record-holder is the 12-megawatt
Erlasee solar park in Germany, though another
40-megawatt park is under construction in the same
region. On Monday, the largest U.S. project was
announced: A 15-megawatt solar PV system to be
built at an air force base in Nevada.
The Sarnia solar farm will be enormous by
comparison, stretching across nearly 365 hectares,
the equivalent of 419 Canadian football fields. An
army of panels will be erected as high as seven
metres off the ground, all tilted south to soak up
sunlight.
In a Canadian context, the magnitude is even more
impressive. The 100- kilowatt solar installation atop
Exhibition Place's historic Horse Palace, now the
largest in Canada, is 400 times smaller than
OptiSolar's proposed farm.
The company would not reveal the cost of the project
for proprietary reasons, but Carrie said a typical
10-megawatt system runs between $70 million and
$80 million. This means the cost of the Sarnia
project, to be built in four 10- megawatt phases,
could carry a price tag of around $300 million.
Forty megawatts is huge, said John Stanton,
vice-president of government affairs at the U.S. Solar
Energy Industries Association in Washington, D.C.
Stanton said solar panel systems, once relegated to
the rooftops of homes, farms and commercial
buildings, are growing in size as technology costs fall
and government incentives increase. There's also an
increasing recognition of the public benefits
associated with solar energy production, he said.
Solar power is carbon-free, it's pollution-free, it
doesn't need water, doesn't make noise. Solar also
produces power during peak business hours, so it
displaces natural gas, he said.
But compared to coal, nuclear power, even wind,
solar's squeaky-clean image comes at a high price.
OptiSolar is selling the electricity to the province
under its new standard offer program, which pays a
premium for electricity that comes from small-scale
renewable projects. In the case of wind, it's 11 cents
per kilowatt-hour. Solar fetches 42 cents per kilowatt
hour, nearly four times as much.
Deborah Doncaster, executive director of the Ontario
Sustainable Energy Association, said the premium
may seem high but is justified given the
environmental benefits. She said it's often forgotten
that solar-generated electricity tends to offset natural
gas during peak periods when air conditioners are
blasting and electricity rates are at their highest.
Forty-two cents compared against 6.4 cents for
nuclear is comparing apples to oranges, she said,
adding that the publicly touted costs of nuclear power
and fossil fuels never reflect environmental costs,
health impacts, and industry subsidies.
I think the issue around 42 cents has to be looked at
in the proper context of hidden costs, Doncaster
said.
And while large on a solar scale, the Sarnia project is
a lightweight compared to nuclear or coal plants.
Peak electricity consumption in Ontario yesterday
was 18,055 megawatts. OptiSolar's farm could at
most supply .2 per cent of that power.
Carrie said OptiSolar chose Ontario over its home
base of California, because of the 42-cent offer,
which isn't available anywhere else in North
America. Only European countries have taken such
an approach, explaining why world solar leader
Germany installed seven times more solar panels than
the United States in 2006.
OptiSolar hopes the premium offered through the
Ontario program will give it a return on its
investment over the life of its 20-year contract with
the province, said Carrie.
The company hopes to break ground in 2008 after
getting the necessary municipal zoning approvals and
building permits. It has already purchased the real
estate it needs, mostly low-value farm and industrial
land, and 

[Biofuel] wolfberry link - supernutrient - Herb of Longevity

2007-04-26 Thread Kirk McLoren
http://www.answers.com/topic/matrimony-vine
   
  seems to grow anywhere as well
   
  http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=LYBA4
   

   
-
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible new car smell?
 Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Patented GMO jatropha

2007-04-26 Thread Mike Cappiello
please tell me how you aquired the seeds. thanks, Mike
cappiello
--- James Quaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Keith,
 
 I'm doing a Jatropha cultivation experiment in AZ.
 It survived the 115F. 
 But the 24F killed a 1/3 of my test planting. It is
 very sensitive to a 
 hard freeze. And according to what I've read,
 standard breeds will 
 produce 300 gal/ acre 600 gal/acre if it blooms
 twice. Jatropha 
 originally from Central America. I'd be very
 interested to see what the 
 GMO stuff does especially in cold climes.
 
 I'm having a heckuva time sprouting seedlings. The
 current batch of 
 seeds I have is from Suriname. We will be doing an
 acre test planting on 
 a farm with saline wells. Jatropha can allegedly
 handle salt pretty well.
 
 Here's what the Germans are doing with it:
 http://www.d1plc.com
 
 Regards,
 JQ
 
 Keith Addison wrote:
 

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-biodiesel1707apr17,0,4223949.story?
 
  track=mostemailedlink
  'Farming our fuel'
  Officials from a local company will tout the
 jatropha plant today in 
  Tallahassee. We're doing things right here in
 Orlando that are going 
  to change America.
 
  Rich Mckay | Sentinel Staff Writer
  Posted April 17, 2007
 
  ABOUT BIODIESEL
  What is it?
  Biodiesel is a fuel made from rendered vegetable
 oils or animal fats 
  refined through a chemical reaction with an
 alcohol.
  What can be used to make it?
  Soybean oil is used to make most of the biodiesel
 in the U.S. 
  Restaurant grease or any vegetable oil such as
 corn, canola, 
  cottonseed, mustard oil also can be used. Jatropha
 oil is widely used 
  in India and Asia. Other companies are developing
 ways to make 
  biodiesel out of algae, restaurant scraps and even
 animal carcasses.
  Why bother?
  Biodiesel is considered an alternative to
 petroleum diesel because it 
  can be grown, rather than pumped from a well. It
 is also considered a 
  neutral gas. It doesn't put back into the
 atmosphere anything it 
  didn't absorb when it was part of the environment.
  Is it as powerful as diesel?
  It is considered to have the same power as
 petroleum diesel.
  What engines can use it?
  It can be mixed with petroleum diesel and used in
 unmodified diesel 
  engines. Engines can be modified to run 100
 percent on biodiesel.
  What does biodiesel smell like?
  That depends its source. Some say it smells like
 french fries. 
  Biodiesel made from jatropha doesn't have a strong
 odor.
  SOURCE: Sentinel research
   
  America, meet your next tank of gas -- made from
 superpowered seeds.
 
  A couple of Orlando entrepreneurs say that a
 Malaysian variety newly 
  approved for U.S. import could help solve
 America's energy woes and 
  boost Central Florida's economy with a new cash
 crop.
 
  State Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson,
 along with executives 
  from the Orlando-based Xenerga Inc., are scheduled
 to introduce a 
  patented version of the jatropha plant today in
 Tallahassee.
 
  We're doing things right here in Orlando that are
 going to change 
  America, said Dave Jarrett, a company spokesman.
 Just wait and see.
 
  The oil pressed from the jatropha nut can be used
 to make biodiesel, 
  producing six to eight times the amount of energy
 extracted from 
  soybeans -- the most common crop used for
 biodiesel in the U.S.
 
  Xenerga president Jason Sayers and his business
 partner Victor Clewes 
  have the exclusive patent on the high-octane
 version of the plant 
  with seeds that grow inside bunches of fat green
 pods the size of 
  peach pits.
 
  It can produce 1,600 gallons of biodiesel per
 acre, compared with 
  soy's 200 gallons, Sayers said.
 
  A Lake Wales farmer is ready to grow 5,000 acres
 of the genetically 
  enhanced jatropha, Jarrett said. And unlike soy,
 which takes lots of 
  tending, fertilizer and water, the jatropha plant
 can grow happily in 
  arid soil, with little water and almost no
 tending.
 
  Think of it as farming our fuel, Sayers said.
 
  President Bush mandated that refineries should
 have renewable fuels 
  blended into 7.5 billion gallons of the nation's
 fuel supply by 2012.
 
  Only about 75 million gallons of biodiesel were
 sold in the U.S. last 
  year, compared with about 6 billion gallons of
 petroleum diesel, 
  according to the National Biodiesel Board, a trade
 organization.
 
  Biodiesel is huge in Europe and Asia, Sayers
 said. America is just 
  now catching up.
 
  So Sayers and his associates are also launching a
 venture with 
  Xenerga that will sell prefabricated mom-and-pop
 biodiesel refineries 
  for about $2 million.
 
  Their plan is to sell turnkey operations,
 manufactured in Germany and 
  shipped here, and promise a steady supply of raw
 materials and 
  customers. They have contracts to build about 16
 of the refineries. 
  Each refinery, if running at capacity, can produce
 5 million gallons 
  of biodiesel a year. Jarrett said they already
 have a slew of 
  inquiries and expect to have 100