[Biofuel] Rick Perry, Tapped for Energy Department, Has Multiple Ties to CEO of Controversial Pipeline Project

2016-12-16 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/38756-rick-perry-with-multiple-ties-to-ceo-of-controversial-pipeline-project-tapped-for-energy-department

[Conflict of interest?  Not in the Trumpian world.  links in on-line 
article]


Rick Perry, Tapped for Energy Department, Has Multiple Ties to CEO of 
Controversial Pipeline Project


Friday, 16 December 2016 00:00

By Ashley Balcerzak, openDemocracy | News Analysis

The Dakota Access Pipeline protesters just got a new reason to keep 
their Standing Rock encampment intact: former Texas governor and 
two-time presidential candidate Rick Perry, tapped by President-elect 
Donald Trump to head his Energy Department.


Never mind that Perry -- who now becomes the second of Trump's 
competitors named to his Cabinet (Ben Carson is slotted for Housing and 
Urban Development) -- previously wanted to scrap the agency altogether.


Now the department will be helmed by a man whose biggest fan -- as 
measured by donations supporting Perry's presidential bids -- is Kelcy 
Warren, CEO of Energy Transfer Partners, the company behind the 
controversial pipeline. Warren gave super PACs supporting Perry's 
presidential bid $6 million last year, though he got nearly $4.5 million 
of it back after Perry dropped out.


And beyond that, Perry is on the board of directors of Energy Transfer 
Partners -- a position he would have to relinquish if he's to become 
secretary. Earlier this month, the Army Corps of Engineers, in response 
to the protests in North Dakota, said it would explore alternate routes 
for the pipeline segment at issue, but the demonstrators on site fear 
the Trump administration will reverse that decision.


Perry raised just $1.4 million for his 2016 campaign, a fraction of what 
he brought in four years earlier. But his super PAC, Opportunity and 
Freedom PAC, brought in almost 10 times that much. Besides Warren, the 
most generous donors included rancher Julianna Holt and her husband, 
Peter Holt, CEO of Holt Companies, which owns the largest US Caterpillar 
dealership ($500,000). The Holts are more than just donors, though: 
According to a financial disclosure form Perry filed last year, the 
candidate had a $250,000 consulting gig with Holt.


Warren and Darwin Deason of Deason Capital Services (whose son, Doug, is 
a big player in the Koch network) each donated $5 million to a second 
super PAC, creatively named Opportunity and Freedom I, but were 
reimbursed most of the funds in late August. The group didn't report any 
independent expenditures, refunding $8.8 million and transferring the 
additional $1 million to the first Opportunity and Freedom PAC.


Top Household Donors to Rick Perry, 1998-2016

Mostly thanks to these large donations, the oil & gas ($1.6 million) 
industry led the way in giving to Perry's campaign committee and super 
PACs combined. And that's a pattern that's been in place pretty much 
throughout Perry's political career; renewable energy advocates aren't 
likely to find much interest in their projects at the top of DOE's 
organizational chart for a while, assuming Perry is confirmed by the Senate.


The miscellaneous finance ($480,000) and livestock ($376,000) industries 
were a distant second and third.


Perry played a far better fundraising game in 2012, collecting $19.7 
million for his campaign, almost all from donations of $200 or more. Oil 
& gas was No. 1 for him in that cycle ($1 million) after retired folks 
($1.1 million); real estate professionals pulled in third ($926 
million). His campaign's top donors came from Ryan LLC, Murray Energy 
and the United States Automobile Association.


His biggest outside backer, Make Us Great Again (sound familiar?), spent 
almost $4 million trying to get Perry to the White House, with large 
donations coming from Dallas-based Contran Corp., formerly headed by 
now-deceased GOP funder Harold Simmons ($1 million); Kelcy Warren and 
Darwin Deason again ($250,000 each); and trial lawyer Tony Buzbee (also 
$250,000), who became Perry's general counsel two years later when a 
grand jury indicted him on two felony counts, later dismissed. (The 
Travis County grand jury charged him with "abuse of official capacity" 
for threatening to veto $7.5 million in funds for a public corruption 
department, and "coercion of a public servant" for pushing for the 
resignation of a district attorney after she was convicted of drunk 
driving.)


Perry's first presidential run came while he was still governor of 
Texas, a slot he occupied from 2000 to 2015, making him the 
longest-serving chief executive of that state. Voters elected Perry to 
three full terms: He raised $24.7 million in 2002, $30.4 million in 2006 
and $49 million in 2010, according to data from the National Institute 
on Money In State Politics.


In his last state election in 2010, he received $5.9 million from -- 
guess who? -- oil & gas interests, $3.8 million from lawyers and 
lobbyists and $3 million from conservative policy organizations. 

[Biofuel] Trump's Carbon-Obsessed Energy Policy and the Planetary Nightmare to Come

2016-12-16 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/38757-trump-s-carbon-obsessed-energy-policy-and-the-planetary-nightmare-to-come

[This is your energy policy on Koch, clearly a reality-altering 
substance.  links in on-line article]


Scroll through Donald Trump's campaign promises or listen to his 
speeches and you could easily conclude that his energy policy consists 
of little more than a wish list drawn up by the major fossil fuel 
companies: lift environmental restrictions on oil and natural gas 
extraction, build the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, open more 
federal lands to drilling, withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, 
kill Obama's Clean Power Plan, revive the coal mining industry, and so 
on and so forth ad infinitum. In fact, many of his proposals have simply 
been lifted straight from the talking points of top energy industry 
officials and their lavishly financed allies in Congress.


If, however, you take a closer look at this morass of pro-carbon 
proposals, an obvious, if as yet unnoted, contradiction quickly becomes 
apparent. Were all Trump's policies to be enacted -- and the appointment 
of the climate-change denier and industry-friendly attorney general of 
Oklahoma, Scott Pruitt, to head the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) suggests the attempt will be made -- not all segments of the 
energy industry will flourish. Instead, many fossil fuel companies will 
be annihilated, thanks to the rock-bottom fuel prices produced by a 
colossal oversupply of oil, coal, and natural gas.


Indeed, stop thinking of Trump's energy policy as primarily aimed at 
helping the fossil fuel companies (although some will surely benefit). 
Think of it instead as a nostalgic compulsion aimed at restoring a 
long-vanished America in which coal plants, steel mills, and 
gas-guzzling automobiles were the designated indicators of progress, 
while concern over pollution -- let alone climate change -- was yet to 
be an issue.


If you want confirmation that such a devastating version of nostalgia 
makes up the heart and soul of Trump's energy agenda, don't focus on his 
specific proposals or any particular combination of them. Look instead 
at his choice of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson as his secretary of state 
and former Governor Rick Perry from oil-soaked Texas as his secretary of 
energy, not to mention the carbon-embracing fervor that ran through his 
campaign statements and positions. According to his election campaign 
website, his top priority will be to "unleash America's $50 trillion in 
untapped shale, oil, and natural gas reserves, plus hundreds of years in 
clean coal reserves." In doing so, it affirmed, Trump would "open 
onshore and offshore leasing on federal lands, eliminate [the] 
moratorium on coal leasing, and open shale energy deposits." In the 
process, any rule or regulation that stands in the way of exploiting 
these reserves will be obliterated.


If all of Trump's proposals are enacted, US greenhouse gas (GHG) 
emissions will soar, wiping out the declines of recent years and 
significantly increasing the pace of global warming. Given that other 
major GHG emitters, especially India and China, will feel less obliged 
to abide by their Paris commitments if the US heads down that path, it's 
almost certain that atmospheric warming will soar beyond the 2 degree 
Celsius rise over pre-industrial levels that scientists consider the 
maximum the planet can absorb without suffering catastrophic 
repercussions. And if, as promised, Trump also repeals a whole raft of 
environmental regulations and essentially dismantles the Environmental 
Protection Agency, much of the progress made over recent years in 
improving our air and water quality will simply be wiped away, and the 
skies over our cities and suburbs will once again turn gray with smog 
and toxic pollutants of all sorts.


Eliminating All Constraints on Carbon Extraction

To fully appreciate the dark, essentially delusional nature of Trump's 
energy nostalgia, let's start by reviewing his proposals. Aside from 
assorted tweets and one-liners, two speeches before energy groups 
represent the most elaborate expression of his views: the first was 
given on May 26th at the Williston Basin Petroleum Conference in 
Bismarck, North Dakota, to groups largely focused on extracting oil from 
shale through hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") in the Bakken shale oil 
formation; the second on September 22nd addressed the Marcellus Shale 
Coalition in Pittsburgh, a group of Pennsylvania gas frackers.


At both events, Trump's comments were designed to curry favor with this 
segment of the industry by promising the repeal of any regulations that 
stood in the way of accelerated drilling. But that was just a start for 
the then-candidate. He went on to lay out an "America-first energy plan" 
designed to eliminate virtually every impediment to the exploitation of 
oil, gas, and coal anywhere in the country or in its surrounding waters, 
ensuring America

[Biofuel] Latest Climate Report: "The Arctic Is Unraveling"

2016-12-16 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/38752-latest-climate-report-the-arctic-is-unravelling

[links in on-line article]

Latest Climate Report: "The Arctic Is Unraveling"

Friday, 16 December 2016 00:00 By Dahr Jamail, Truthout | News Analysis

The Arctic's average surface air temperature for the year ending 
September 2016 was, by far, the highest since 1900. New monthly record 
high temperature records were recorded for January, February, October 
and November of this year.


Spring snow cover extent in the North American Arctic was the lowest 
ever in the satellite records, which began in 1967.


In the nearly four decades of Greenland Ice Sheet observations, only one 
year had an earlier onset of spring melting than this year.


The Arctic's biodiversity is changing, radically, before our eyes, 
including a movement of sub-Arctic species northward and an increase in 
parasites.


These are just a few of the highlights from the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) recently released 2016 Arctic Report 
Card.


The report, sponsored by NOAA and coauthored by more than 50 scientists 
from three continents, is extremely sobering, with the report's authors 
concluding that, "The Arctic is unraveling."


A Completely New Arctic Climate

Data from the report indicate that the Arctic is warming at double the 
global average temperature rate. The report shows that if this fall's 
extreme warmth in the Arctic persists for another few years, it will 
likely signal a completely new climate for the region.


"We've seen a year in 2016 like we've never seen before … with clear 
acceleration of many global warming signals," NOAA's Arctic Research 
Program Director Jeremy Mathis told reporters at the American 
Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco this week where the report 
was released.


"The Arctic was whispering change," report coauthor Donald Perovich, who 
studies Arctic climate at Dartmouth, said. "Now it's not whispering. 
It's speaking, it's shouting change, and the changes are large."


The report showed that extremely warm Arctic air temperatures last 
January and February caused the smallest maximum winter sea ice extent 
on record. The previous record was hit in 2015.


Then, just last month, the return of extremely warm temperatures caused 
a period of retreating and melting ice during a time of year when the 
ice has typically grown extremely rapidly.


And as usual, the impacts of anthropogenic climate disruption (ACD) are 
extremely evident in Greenland.


"The Greenland Ice Sheet continued to lose mass in 2016," Columbia 
University Earth Observatory climate researcher Marco Tedesco said. "The 
melt onset was the second earliest and the melt season was 30 to 40 days 
longer than average in the northeastern US."


According to the report, Greenland's spring snow cover extent reached 
new record lows. Meanwhile, the snow depth is also decreasing, leading 
to even earlier, as well as faster, melting of the ice.


Another ramification of the dramatic warming of the Arctic is that 
permafrost is now releasing more greenhouse gases, like methane, which 
is 100 times more potent of a greenhouse gas than CO2, during the 
winter. The report notes that this is happening now at a rate faster 
than that at which plants can absorb the gas during the summer, which 
means the Arctic has now become a net source of heat-trapping pollution.


It's not just the ground that's warming rapidly: Air temperatures across 
the Arctic have continued to soar past previous records. Between January 
and March 2016, temperatures blew away previous record highs, with some 
areas reporting records of more than 8 degrees Celsius above prior highs.


The report addresses how the melting of the Arctic is literally changing 
the path of the jet stream, which is what is likely going to lead to 
even more sustained extreme weather events across the entire Northern 
Hemisphere. One example is the so-called Polar Vortex that has been 
wracking the northeastern US in recent years -- including right now.


University of Sheffield geographer Edward Hanna, who coauthored the 
report's chapter on air surface temperatures, wrote about how the 
warming Arctic air temperatures are causing a trend towards younger, 
thinner Arctic sea ice, which means that its meltdown could well already 
be irreversible.


"It's hard to see how the summer sea ice will survive," Hanna concluded.

Trump's Denialism

The election of Donald Trump could not have come at a worse time for the 
climate, as the Arctic meltdown intensifies and dramatic warning signs 
around the planet continue to escalate. President-elect Trump has 
stacked his cabinet with ACD deniers much like himself.


This week, the Trump transition team launched an "Energy Independence" 
website that underscores his intentions to open vast areas of the Arctic 
to fossil fuel development, as well as to scrap all existing climate 
action plans.


Rafe Pomerance, chair of Arctic 21