required to have a
vehicle (a bicycle would be an easy alternative otherwise).
dylan
-- a
href="" href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=0amp;t=86">http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=0amp;t=86img
border=0 alt=Get Firefox! title=Get Fir
It is a good point that losing weight and increasing fuel efficiency go
hand in hand. It seems that the heart of the issue is
consumption. Kind of obvious but it does make sense.
d-- a
href=""
I didn't know diesel bikes existed. brilliant!
dOn 7/11/06, Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And by peaks, I mean it is at a minimum On 7/11/06, Zeke Yewdall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
you look at the grams per horsepower hour consumption for the VW 1.9TDI
you'll find that it peaks at
station wagon (32
mpg on the freeway during a weeklong roadtrip). So, i am sorry if
i have offended.
I suppose the real goal is to be more fuel conscious and do whatever we
are able to to improve fuel efficiency and rid ourselves of the
reliance on petroleum fuels.
dylan
On 7/9/06, Kurt Nolte [EMAIL
the savings would be double edged: lighter
people and smaller more fuel efficient cars. Voila! (that's not
even mentioning the money saved on healthcare for diseases related to
obesity)
Dylan
-- a
href="" href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=0amp;t=86">http://w
