Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Darryl McMahon
Let's remember that the issue is not whether or not nature produces 
greenhouse gases - we know it does.  IMO, the issue is whether or not 
the balance that has existed for many thousands of years and made the 
planet's surface sufficiently hospitable and stable for our species is 
shifting to our disadvantage.  If it is, the next question is whether or 
not humans can change their behaviour at a planetary level to bring us 
back to the desired balance, whatever the root cause of the shift may 
turn out to be (I suspect it will be a mix of factors, including our 
addiction to burning fossil fuels at an unprecedented rate over the past 
century).

We need the planet and the environment to be relatively stable and 
hospitable for the survival of the human species.  The planet has no 
such dependence on us.

As for this article, well it's just another theory, and remains to be 
tested.  Until it survives serious scrutiny, it's just more smoke. 
Krakatoa had a huge short-term impact as well, but there was a return to 
balance to a matter of years.  I'm not ready to try to compare the two 
events, but shouldn't we be seeing a return to balance after the Russian 
meteorite impact, rather than an ever-increasing divergence?

Darryl McMahon

Randall wrote:
 Very interesting article!   It does help to remember that nature operates on 
 a scale MUCH larger than mere human activity.
 
 Time will tell if this theory is given the same testing as other theories 
 have been given, or if it is just brushed under the rug.
 
 --Randall
 Charlotte, NC
 
 ___
 
  Heisenberg may have slept here 
 
 If I had eight hours to chop down a tree, I'd spend six sharpening my 
 xe.  --Abraham Lincoln
 
 ___
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:09 PM
 Subject: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone
 
 
 
 Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone


 A new theory to explain global warming was revealed at a meeting at
 the University of Leicester (UK) and is being considered for
 publication in the journal Science First Hand. The controversial
 theory has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels and atmospheric
 carbon dioxide levels.

http://www.physorg.com/news11710.html

I found this interesting based on the credibility of the source.
Controversial, it should be published to stand the scrutiny test given
by the entire scientific world.

Jim


-- 
Darryl McMahon  http://www.econogics.com
It's your planet.  If you won't look after it, who will?


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Mike Weaver
.
Controversial, it should be published to stand the scrutiny test given
by the entire scientific world.
  


... said Jim. It will be. I don't know much about the credibility of 
the source though. It's not the University of Leicester, it was 
presented at a meeting there, and we'd have to know a bit more about 
that and the reception it got from the guy's peers. Also I don't know 
anything about the journal Science First Hand that's allegedly 
considering it for publication, is it a reputable peer-reviewed 
journal? I don't know anything about physorg.com either, but that it 
smashes greenhouse theory seems to indicate a bit of an agenda on 
the part of the headline writer, and you'd have to be scientifically 
naive to think that anyone serious still argues for a single cause of 
climate change. The denialists and Baliunas's and so on like to 
divide and conquer it that way though.

However, the first comment in the discussion at the physorg.com site 
is: If anything rather than disproving global warming it acts as a 
sister to global warming.

Best

Keith


  

--Randall
Charlotte, NC

___

 Heisenberg may have slept here 

If I had eight hours to chop down a tree, I'd spend six sharpening my
xe.  --Abraham Lincoln

___



- Original Message -
From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:09 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone




 Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone


 A new theory to explain global warming was revealed at a meeting at
 the University of Leicester (UK) and is being considered for
 publication in the journal Science First Hand. The controversial
 theory has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels and atmospheric
 carbon dioxide levels.

http://www.physorg.com/news11710.html

I found this interesting based on the credibility of the source.
Controversial, it should be published to stand the scrutiny test given
by the entire scientific world.

Jim
  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread robert luis rabello
Mike Weaver wrote:
 Wrong.

Right.
 
 *God gave Man dominion over all the earth.*

The implication is one of stewardship.  Man was supposed to work the 
earth and care for it.
 
 *Genesis 1:26* Then God said, Let us make man in our image, in our 
 likeness, and */let them rule/* over the fish of the sea and the birds 
 of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the 
 creatures that move along the ground.

The nations were angry;
and your wrath has come.
The time for judging the dead
and for rewarding your servants the prophets
and your saints and those who reverence your name,
both small and great;
and for destroying those who destroy the earth.  Rev. 11:18


 Now, getta the way of my SUV.  I gotta stop at Wal-Mart before church 
 starts.

Now, I know people have difficulty with reading comprehension, and I 
realize your tongue is firmly planted in your cheek.  But in the event 
that some profoundly misinformed church goer spews out the dominion 
argument, it's often helpful to respond WITH scripture in order to 
provide some enlightenment.


robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Mike Weaver
Sorry, dude.

You lost me at the reading part.

robert luis rabello wrote:

Mike Weaver wrote:
  

Wrong.



   Right.
  

*God gave Man dominion over all the earth.*



   The implication is one of stewardship.  Man was supposed to work the 
earth and care for it.
  

*Genesis 1:26* Then God said, Let us make man in our image, in our 
likeness, and */let them rule/* over the fish of the sea and the birds 
of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the 
creatures that move along the ground.



   The nations were angry;
   and your wrath has come.
   The time for judging the dead
   and for rewarding your servants the prophets
   and your saints and those who reverence your name,
   both small and great;
   and for destroying those who destroy the earth.  Rev. 11:18


  

Now, getta the way of my SUV.  I gotta stop at Wal-Mart before church 
starts.



   Now, I know people have difficulty with reading comprehension, and I 
realize your tongue is firmly planted in your cheek.  But in the event 
that some profoundly misinformed church goer spews out the dominion 
argument, it's often helpful to respond WITH scripture in order to 
provide some enlightenment.


robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Chip Mefford
Mike Weaver wrote:
 Wrong.
 
 *God gave Man dominion over all the earth.*
 
 *Genesis 1:26* Then God said, Let us make man in our image, in our 
 likeness, and */let them rule/* over the fish of the sea and the birds 
 of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the 
 creatures that move along the ground.
 
 Now, getta the way of my SUV.  I gotta stop at Wal-Mart before church 
 starts.
 
 'Merika
 
 
 
 Keith Addison wrote:
 


Okay everyone, note I didn't start this, Mike did.

And since he decided to go here, I'll go too.

a lot of folks, including a *LOT* of, if not most, christians,
take this passage to imply that God gave man complete
license to use and dispose of the earth any way he
saw fit. Surely it can be read this way. However, taking
the long view, this doesn't make sense, why? Because it
DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Q.E.D.

Of course, just as if the Bible were Slashdot, and the
whole of culture were the Internet, folks find what
they like, disregard the rest.

For this thesis for example, that Man is by creation,
a God ordained Raper and Plunderer of all things
of God's makings. (The common view), one has to completely
disregard Gen 2, in general, and  Gen 2:15
in particular And Jehovah God took the man, and put him
into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

Okay, break it down. Did Jehovah God place man
into the garden to decimate, exploit, slash,
burn, mine, kill and then move on ? *OR*
did Jehovah God place man into the
garden (God's garden btw, not man's)
to dress and keep it.

I give you two examples;
An Amish Farm
An Openpit Mine.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread robert luis rabello
Mike Weaver wrote:

 Sorry, dude.
 
 You lost me at the reading part.

Oh, that's right.  You didn't hear it from the pulpit . . .

I'm doing the praise service at church this weekend.  Wanna come up 
and hear me talk about environmental stewardship?

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Mike Weaver
I go to one of those drive-through churches.

robert luis rabello wrote:

Mike Weaver wrote:

  

Sorry, dude.

You lost me at the reading part.


   
   Oh, that's right.  You didn't hear it from the pulpit . . .

   I'm doing the praise service at church this weekend.  Wanna come up 
and hear me talk about environmental stewardship?

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Paul S Cantrell
Mike, I didn't know you were a Scientologist! Wink wink nudge nudge...I'd never accuse my worst enemy of that!I prefer online church: http://churchoffools.com
On 3/28/06, Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I go to one of those drive-through churches.robert luis rabello wrote:Mike Weaver wrote:Sorry, dude.You lost me at the reading part.
 Oh, that's right.You didn't hear it from the pulpit . . . I'm doing the praise service at church this weekend.Wanna come upand hear me talk about environmental stewardship?
robert luis rabelloThe Edge of JusticeAdventure for Your Mindhttp://www.newadventure.caRanger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/___Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/___Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/-- Thanks,PCHe's the kind of a guy who lights up a room just by flicking a switchYou can't have everything. Where would you put it? - Steven Wright
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Fred Finch
Is that the same as one of those drive through liquor stores?On 3/28/06, Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I go to one of those drive-through churches.robert luis rabello wrote:
Mike Weaver wrote:Sorry, dude.You lost me at the reading part. Oh, that's right.You didn't hear it from the pulpit . . .
 I'm doing the praise service at church this weekend.Wanna come upand hear me talk about environmental stewardship?robert luis rabelloThe Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mindhttp://www.newadventure.caRanger Supercharger Project Pagehttp://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/
___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Joe Street




Human activity is a part of the whole picture and it is ridiculous and
academic to have a discussion otherwise. Further to the discussion of
atmospheric concentrations of water vapor, ice crystal, and greenhouse
gasses there is also the effect seldom mentioned of other aerosols.
Sulfuric acid for example has a significant negaitive feedback effect.
Sulfuric acid droplets never completely evaporate but shrink and grow
depending on conditions but they are highly reflective. It is ironic
that the disaster of Sept. 11 afforded scientists an otherwise
impossible opportunity to observe the effect of having no aircraft
flying in the upper atmosphere and what they found was that there was a
marked increase in radiation influx during that time. It is also
ironic that this information means that the sulphur content in
petroleum jet fuel is having a counter effect on global warming and I'm
surprised the petro industry isn't all over that one but I guess it
still is not politically correct to be contributing to acid rain even
if you are combatting global warming LOL. I guess if we ever get all
the planes and cars burning low sulphur fuels we might have a little
more evidence of global warming in our faces eh? 

Joe

"God is a little too fond of a joke" -- Aristotle




bob allen wrote:

  I'm quite unimpressed with the article.  To claim that the observed elevation in temperatures is not 
due to the burgeoning concentrations of radiatively forcing gases in the atmosphere begs the 
question of why.  We know that gases such as CO2 and methane absorb strongly in the infrared.  Heat 
absorbed on the surface of the planet is radiated in the infrared, so CO2, methane, et. al. should 
trap the heat. So why is this phenomenon not observed? Is our understanding of simple physical 
principles that bad.

The article also badly represents the impact of water vapor in the atmosphere with respect to global 
warming.  Simply stated, water vapor is a dependent variable. That is, the hotter the atmosphere, 
the higher water vapor concentration in the atmosphere.  It produces a strong positive feedback that 
is accounted for in most if not all the gcm's (global climate models).

So how I'm not surprised that a country holding something like the second largest reserves of oil 
and gas on the planet might be proffering a alternative to the well accepted correlation between 
greenhouse gas emissions and the  "theory of global warming".

I will file this one under my rug.


Randall wrote:
  
  
Very interesting article!   It does help to remember that nature operates on 
a scale MUCH larger than mere human activity.

Time will tell if this theory is given the same testing as other theories 
have been given, or if it is just brushed under the rug.

--Randall
Charlotte, NC

___

 Heisenberg may have slept here 

"If I had eight hours to chop down a tree, I'd spend six sharpening my 
xe."  --Abraham Lincoln

___



- Original Message - 
From: "JJJN" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "BIO" Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:09 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone




   Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone


 A new theory to explain global warming was revealed at a meeting at
 the University of Leicester (UK) and is being considered for
 publication in the journal "Science First Hand". The controversial
 theory has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels and atmospheric
 carbon dioxide levels.

http://www.physorg.com/news11710.html

I found this interesting based on the credibility of the source.
Controversial, it should be published to stand the scrutiny test given
by the entire scientific world.

Jim

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/





  
  

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and B

Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Mike Weaver
That's where we get the wine

Fred Finch wrote:

 Is that the same as one of those drive through liquor stores?

 On 3/28/06, *Mike Weaver* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I go to one of those drive-through churches.

 robert luis rabello wrote:

 Mike Weaver wrote:
 
 
 
 Sorry, dude.
 
 You lost me at the reading part.
 
 
 
Oh, that's right.  You didn't hear it from the pulpit . . .
 
I'm doing the praise service at church this
 weekend.  Wanna come up
 and hear me talk about environmental stewardship?
 
 robert luis rabello
 The Edge of Justice
 Adventure for Your Mind
 http://www.newadventure.ca
 
 Ranger Supercharger Project Page
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org mailto:Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives
 (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 



 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org mailto:Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread Appal Energy
Preach it Brother Rabello!

Can I hear an amen?

Always wondered how so many Christians could shuck off environmental 
responsibility - as if right to life in the future is somehow different 
from right to life in the present.

There are a few good beans and it's getting better. Just looking for a 
day when the glass is two-halfves full.

Todd Swearingen



robert luis rabello wrote:

Mike Weaver wrote:

  

Sorry, dude.

You lost me at the reading part.


   
   Oh, that's right.  You didn't hear it from the pulpit . . .

   I'm doing the praise service at church this weekend.  Wanna come up 
and hear me talk about environmental stewardship?

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-28 Thread robert luis rabello
Appal Energy wrote:

 Preach it Brother Rabello!

Grief!  Even my sisters don't call me that!

 Always wondered how so many Christians could shuck off environmental 
 responsibility - as if right to life in the future is somehow different 
 from right to life in the present.

I think most people only swallow what they're fed with a spoon.  I 
once got in trouble among certain parishoners for teaching out of the 
Bible in a church school, so I walked into the pastor's office with my 
Bible and a pair of scissors.  I put the Bible and scissors on his 
desk and asked the pastor to cut out the parts he didn't want me teaching.

Am I afraid to make a point?

I didn't keep that job, but in retrospect, it wasn't worth having. 
Too many people turn off their brains when it comes to faith.  The 
drummer in my praise band has a tee shirt that reads: Jesus, I love 
you, but save me from your followers.

 There are a few good beans and it's getting better. Just looking for a 
 day when the glass is two-halfves full.

Keep the faith, Todd!

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-27 Thread bob allen
I'm quite unimpressed with the article.  To claim that the observed elevation 
in temperatures is not 
due to the burgeoning concentrations of radiatively forcing gases in the 
atmosphere begs the 
question of why.  We know that gases such as CO2 and methane absorb strongly in 
the infrared.  Heat 
absorbed on the surface of the planet is radiated in the infrared, so CO2, 
methane, et. al. should 
trap the heat. So why is this phenomenon not observed? Is our understanding of 
simple physical 
principles that bad.

The article also badly represents the impact of water vapor in the atmosphere 
with respect to global 
warming.  Simply stated, water vapor is a dependent variable. That is, the 
hotter the atmosphere, 
the higher water vapor concentration in the atmosphere.  It produces a strong 
positive feedback that 
is accounted for in most if not all the gcm's (global climate models).

So how I'm not surprised that a country holding something like the second 
largest reserves of oil 
and gas on the planet might be proffering a alternative to the well accepted 
correlation between 
greenhouse gas emissions and the  theory of global warming.

I will file this one under my rug.


Randall wrote:
 Very interesting article!   It does help to remember that nature operates on 
 a scale MUCH larger than mere human activity.
 
 Time will tell if this theory is given the same testing as other theories 
 have been given, or if it is just brushed under the rug.
 
 --Randall
 Charlotte, NC
 
 ___
 
  Heisenberg may have slept here 
 
 If I had eight hours to chop down a tree, I'd spend six sharpening my 
 xe.  --Abraham Lincoln
 
 ___
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:09 PM
 Subject: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone
 
 
  Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone


  A new theory to explain global warming was revealed at a meeting at
  the University of Leicester (UK) and is being considered for
  publication in the journal Science First Hand. The controversial
  theory has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels and atmospheric
  carbon dioxide levels.

 http://www.physorg.com/news11710.html

 I found this interesting based on the credibility of the source.
 Controversial, it should be published to stand the scrutiny test given
 by the entire scientific world.

 Jim

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 
 


-- 
Bob Allen
http://ozarker.org/bob

Science is what we have learned about how to keep
from fooling ourselves - Richard Feynman

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-27 Thread Keith Addison
 allegedly 
considering it for publication, is it a reputable peer-reviewed 
journal? I don't know anything about physorg.com either, but that it 
smashes greenhouse theory seems to indicate a bit of an agenda on 
the part of the headline writer, and you'd have to be scientifically 
naive to think that anyone serious still argues for a single cause of 
climate change. The denialists and Baliunas's and so on like to 
divide and conquer it that way though.

However, the first comment in the discussion at the physorg.com site 
is: If anything rather than disproving global warming it acts as a 
sister to global warming.

Best

Keith


--Randall
Charlotte, NC

___

 Heisenberg may have slept here 

If I had eight hours to chop down a tree, I'd spend six sharpening my
xe.  --Abraham Lincoln

___



- Original Message -
From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:09 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone


 
   Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone
 
 
   A new theory to explain global warming was revealed at a meeting at
   the University of Leicester (UK) and is being considered for
   publication in the journal Science First Hand. The controversial
   theory has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels and atmospheric
   carbon dioxide levels.
 
  http://www.physorg.com/news11710.html
 
  I found this interesting based on the credibility of the source.
  Controversial, it should be published to stand the scrutiny test given
  by the entire scientific world.
 
  Jim


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Greenhouse theory - smashed by biggest stone

2006-03-26 Thread JJJN

  Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone


  A new theory to explain global warming was revealed at a meeting at
  the University of Leicester (UK) and is being considered for
  publication in the journal Science First Hand. The controversial
  theory has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels and atmospheric
  carbon dioxide levels.

http://www.physorg.com/news11710.html

I found this interesting based on the credibility of the source. 
Controversial, it should be published to stand the scrutiny test given 
by the entire scientific world.

Jim

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/