Hi MH,
I do like the excerpt
“Montana does not have to become a national sacrifice area
for a faulty federal energy policy.”
I guess when Americans are hooked like winos on cheap fuel the fastest
way to get them a fix is the stance most politico's take. Coal is a
loser. Gov. Schweitzer
Only quibble with that is that we don't really have an energy policy.
It's just consume consume consume, and damn the cost.
JJJN wrote:
Hi MH,
I do like the excerpt
“Montana does not have to become a national sacrifice area
for a faulty federal energy policy.”
I guess when
OK Mike,
I went to, http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/
and it says we do have a policy National Energy Policy to be exact,
but you must be referring to hopelessly pathetic message it contains, if
not that then perhaps the cryptic coded quote by our great leader that
we can still have
OK Mike,
I went to, http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/
and it says we do have a policy National Energy Policy to be exact,
but you must be referring to hopelessly pathetic message it contains, if
not that then perhaps the cryptic coded quote by our great leader that
we can still have
Hi MH,
I do like the excerpt
But I hate the subject title, and it sure won't make archives
searches any more chic either. US =?windows-1252?Q? ??? (Well,
maybe it does, who knows these days anyway.) I think it's these
little and thingies that do it, yuk.
Please set emailer defaults to
MH wrote:
Sounds like a great conference! This paragraph caught my attention:
A second coal story came out of Great Falls, where the City Council
voted 4-1 to spend $2 million of that city’s funds on “preparations”
for the proposed 250 megawatt Highwood coal-burning power plant east
of the
Cooling. Any thermal power plant rejects roughly 60 - 70% of the
energy from burning fuel as waste heat. Some plants use big ponds
that just sit there and give off heat (evaporating in the process),
and some use cooling towers (that's what the giant concrete things are
on nuclear power plants,
