elieve they are
free."
-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
--
Check out my latest blogs at http://KinsleyForPrez08.blogspot.com
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:43 PM
Yah, well, Gary Trudeau I'm not.
Andres Yver wrote:
>On Tuesday, September 27, 2005, at 09:43 PM, Appal Energy wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>>Well, with a little bit 'a luck and if you work at it a bit, you just
>>might get your county commissioners, town council and mayor to lobby
>>the military to let
Mike. You should go work for Karl Rove. Excellent skills at taking
quotes out of context.
> OK Zeke, you got my attention with...
>
> "...and figured that killing a few people in order to kick start the
> political process and
> eventually potentially save many more people was worth it."
I was
OK Zeke, you got my attention with...
"...and figured that killing a few people in order to kick start the political process andeventually potentially save many more people was worth it."
Then followed up with:
"This has been going on for years, whether or not we approve."
and
"Actually,
On Tuesday, September 27, 2005, at 09:43 PM, Appal Energy wrote:
> Well, with a little bit 'a luck and if you work at it a bit, you just
> might get your county commissioners, town council and mayor to lobby
> the military to let your area and neighbors to be ground zero for
> testing such "d
y have
come up with a few new tricks as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] US army plans to bulk-buy anthrax
> >The reality is if the DOD wanted to cover
>
> So it's okay for civilians to make "battlefield decisions" in peace time
> - decisions that effectively discount some human life in lieu of a
> theoretically greater good?
>
This has been going on for years, whether or not we approve.
Actually, it's probably what inspired the old Star Trek ep
So Zeke,
You're "...not even saying this was bad if it was what happened..."
So it's okay for civilians to make "battlefield decisions" in peace time
- decisions that effectively discount some human life in lieu of a
theoretically greater good?
How about we move your name to the top of the lis
Not to be too much of a conspiracy theorist, but if you were trying to
increase funding for your bioterrorism department, don't you think it
might work great if someone internal leaked a little anthrax through
the postal system, and created a big hullabuloo, which would get
congress in gear to give
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zeke Yewdall
>Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 2:16 PM
>To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] US army plans to bulk-buy anthrax
>
>
>Yes, there are legitimate and good purposes to all of their plans.
>But based on history I think we can trus
Keith Addison wrote:
By the way, whatever happened to all those folks who were
arrested for the anthrax attacks in 2001?
Exerpts below from two articles in 2002 shed some light on his
question:
1) Thinking the Unthinkable...Was the Anthrax an Inside Job?
Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen d
>Keith Addison posted an article which said:
> > Although the Sterne strain is not thought to be harmful to humans and
> > is used for vaccination, the contracts have caused major concern.
>
>So the ability to grow this a non-lethal strain to make a vaccine that
>could save thousands or tens of tho
of billions, and not one significant leak.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zeke Yewdall
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 2:16 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] US army plans to bulk-buy anthrax
Yes, ther
John,
> And a knife can be used to cut up veggies for dinner
> or it could be used to stab someone. A car can take
> you to work or mow down a car full of pedestrians.
> An Xray machine can find your cavities or deliver a
> lethal dose. We're talking about a tool here, nothing
> more. Tools may en
Hi All,
The relevant point here is that anthrax as a weapon falls into the
MAD (mutually assured destruction) category and has potentially more
long-lasting harmful effects than the A-bomb. In 1939 at the start of WW2
British scientists testing the life span of anthrax sprayed it on a sma
John,
I think that your arguments are strong and that this is a no
win issue.
Assume that the reasons are pure defence and concerns
about the citizens of the world, then this facility is absolute
necessary to do so.
Assume that the real reasons are to develop an anthrax weapon
and at the same t
Yes, there are legitimate and good purposes to all of their plans.
But based on history I think we can trust the US DOD to ignore the
uses you have pointed out which could save lives, and focus on killing
people.
On 9/27/05, John Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keith Addison posted an article
Keith Addison posted an article which said:
> Although the Sterne strain is not thought to be harmful to humans and
> is used for vaccination, the contracts have caused major concern.
So the ability to grow this a non-lethal strain to make a vaccine that
could save thousands or tens of thousands
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/dn8044
New Scientist
US army plans to bulk-buy anthrax
24 September 2005
David Hambling
THE US military wants to buy large quantities of anthrax, in a
controversial move that is likely to raise questions over its
commitment to treaties designed to lim
19 matches
Mail list logo
