:05 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] No need for conservation?
On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 10:40 AM, James Slayden wrote:
I seriously don't think that even a diesel truck (or SUV) running on
B100
getting 20 (or less) mpg could do better in consumption or emissions
I agree that B100 in any application is a great idea, but most people are
just not there yet, nor are there the clean high milage diesels in any
great numbers in the US (but we can hope on the Lupo!!). Personally I am
waiting for the diesel Jeep Liberty this fall.
James Slayden
On Thu, 3 Jul
Hrmm, 50 - 70 mpg Hybrids ..
Interestingly enough I was riding in a friends Prius just yesterday and
the average MPH for the 180 mile round trip was 45.9 mpg. That included
various grade climbs, including Altimont Pass. So, how far off is that
from your projected 50-70 mpg. Not much,
On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 10:40 AM, James Slayden wrote:
I seriously don't think that even a diesel truck (or SUV) running on
B100
getting 20 (or less) mpg could do better in consumption or emissions,
only
the TDI running B100 besting this. Now when diesel hybrids and high
milage
]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:02 PM
Subject: [biofuel] No need for conservation?
First off, many thanks for the correction on the capacity of a barrel,
which
in fact could be anywhere from 31 to 42 gallons liquid, but then even that
actual amount could change
First off, many thanks for the correction on the capacity of a barrel, which
in fact could be anywhere from 31 to 42 gallons liquid, but then even that
actual amount could change somewhat if we consider Imperial gallons rather
than US.
There is a variety of barrels established by law or usage.
