: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2007 10:16
To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [svg-developers] Re: SVG on Dual Core Machines ?
Hi,
have you tried in another SVG user agent?
Opera, Firefox, Batik?
You have to be aware that the Adobe SVG viewer 3 is old code (not
seriously updated since 2001
On 27 févr. 2007, at 11:15, Chris Peto wrote:
Unfortunetly, all these implementations that you refer to are too
slow.
I hope these implementations will work on performance soon or are
already.
There may of course be features which Opera is worse than ASV in
terms of performance, but I
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:29:49 +0100, Antoine Quint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 févr. 2007, at 11:15, Chris Peto wrote:
Unfortunetly, all these implementations that you refer to are too
slow.
I hope these implementations will work on performance soon or are
already.
There may of course
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Re: SVG on Dual Core Machines ?
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:29:49 +0100, Antoine Quint [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:ml%40graougraou.com com wrote:
On 27 févr. 2007, at 11:15, Chris Peto wrote:
Unfortunetly, all these implementations that you refer to are too
slow
--Antoine Quint wrote:--
There may of course be features which Opera is worse than ASV in
terms of performance, but I generally find Opera equally as fast or
faster than ASV and since it has SVG features implemented natively, I
consider it to be a superior implementation to ASV.
In general, I
-developers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [svg-developers] Re: SVG on Dual Core Machines ?
Hi Chris,
It is true that for many things ASV is still the fastest SVG
implementation. But this is changing. ASV
Regarding Opera: it is funny, but performance for Opera on MacOSX is
often better than on Windows
6 matches
Mail list logo
