On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:07 AM Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Alan Somers wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:48 AM Bruce Evans wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> I'm not sure which variants are most readable:
> >> ...
> >>> C)
> >>>if
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Alan Somers wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:48 AM Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, John Baldwin wrote:
...
I'm not sure which variants are most readable:
...
C)
if (fp->f_seqcount + howmany(resid, 16384) < fp->f_seqcount)
fp->f_seqcount =
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:48 AM Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On 7/14/19 12:08 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> >>
> >> This change restores the possible overflow beyond IO_SEQMAX that the
> >> removed conditional prevented.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:44
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, John Baldwin wrote:
On 7/14/19 12:08 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
This change restores the possible overflow beyond IO_SEQMAX that the
removed conditional prevented.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:44 PM Alan Somers wrote:
I thought the same for a while on Tue, Jan 25, then
On 7/14/19 12:08 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> This change restores the possible overflow beyond IO_SEQMAX that the
> removed conditional prevented.
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:44 PM Alan Somers wrote:
>>
>> Author: asomers
>> Date: Tue Jun 25 19:44:22 2019
>> New Revision: 349391
Hi Alan,
This change restores the possible overflow beyond IO_SEQMAX that the
removed conditional prevented.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:44 PM Alan Somers wrote:
>
> Author: asomers
> Date: Tue Jun 25 19:44:22 2019
> New Revision: 349391
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/349391
>
