Am 19.11.20 um 00:20 schrieb Brooks Davis:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:05:51AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 18.11.20 um 23:14 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
Why not? There could easily be code out there calling getenv in a
multi-threaded context so this is inadequate as a replacement. Yes it's
Am 19.11.20 um 01:37 schrieb Mateusz Guzik:
On 11/19/20, Stefan Esser wrote:
[...]
I just wanted to provide an implementation of this functionality to
be used in a number of programs where other developers had expressed
interest in such a feature (and one of these programs has been worked
on
On 11/19/20, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 18.11.20 um 23:39 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
>> On 18 Nov 2020, at 22:32, Stefan Esser wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 18.11.20 um 22:40 schrieb Mateusz Guzik:
> +{
> + static const int localbase_oid[2] = {CTL_USER, USER_LOCALBASE};
There is no use for this to
Am 18.11.20 um 23:39 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
On 18 Nov 2020, at 22:32, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 18.11.20 um 22:40 schrieb Mateusz Guzik:
+{
+ static const int localbase_oid[2] = {CTL_USER, USER_LOCALBASE};
There is no use for this to be static.
Why not? This makes it part of the
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:05:51AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 18.11.20 um 23:14 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
> > On 18 Nov 2020, at 21:52, Stefan Esser wrote:
> >> Am 18.11.20 um 22:15 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
> >>> On 18 Nov 2020, at 19:44, Stefan E??er wrote:
> +/*
> +
Am 18.11.20 um 23:14 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
On 18 Nov 2020, at 21:52, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 18.11.20 um 22:15 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
On 18 Nov 2020, at 19:44, Stefan Eßer wrote:
+ /*
+* Check for some other thread already having
+* set
On 18 Nov 2020, at 22:32, Stefan Esser wrote:
>
> Am 18.11.20 um 22:40 schrieb Mateusz Guzik:
>>> +{
>>> + static const int localbase_oid[2] = {CTL_USER, USER_LOCALBASE};
>> There is no use for this to be static.
>
> Why not? This makes it part of the constant initialized data of
> the
Am 18.11.20 um 22:40 schrieb Mateusz Guzik:
+{
+ static const int localbase_oid[2] = {CTL_USER, USER_LOCALBASE};
There is no use for this to be static.
Why not? This makes it part of the constant initialized data of
the library, which is more efficient under run-time and memory
space
On 18 Nov 2020, at 21:52, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 18.11.20 um 22:15 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
>> On 18 Nov 2020, at 19:44, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> +* Check for some other thread already having
>>> +* set localbase - this should use atomic ops.
>>> +
Am 18.11.20 um 22:27 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
On 18 Nov 2020, at 21:15, Jessica Clarke wrote:
On 18 Nov 2020, at 19:44, Stefan Eßer wrote:
+ /*
+* Check for some other thread already having
+* set localbase - this should use atomic ops.
+
Am 18.11.20 um 22:15 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
On 18 Nov 2020, at 19:44, Stefan Eßer wrote:
+ /*
+* Check for some other thread already having
+* set localbase - this should use atomic ops.
+* The amount of memory allocated above
On 18 Nov 2020, at 21:40, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> On 11/18/20, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>> Author: se
>> Date: Wed Nov 18 19:44:30 2020
>> New Revision: 367813
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367813
>>
>> Log:
>> Add function getlocalbase() to libutil.
>>
>> This function
On 11/18/20, Stefan Eßer wrote:
> Author: se
> Date: Wed Nov 18 19:44:30 2020
> New Revision: 367813
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367813
>
> Log:
> Add function getlocalbase() to libutil.
>
> This function returns the path to the local software base directory, by
>
On 18 Nov 2020, at 21:15, Jessica Clarke wrote:
>
> On 18 Nov 2020, at 19:44, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Check for some other thread already having
>> + * set localbase - this should use atomic ops.
>> + * The amount of memory allocated
On 18 Nov 2020, at 19:44, Stefan Eßer wrote:
> + /*
> + * Check for some other thread already having
> + * set localbase - this should use atomic ops.
> + * The amount of memory allocated above may leak,
> + * if a parallel update
15 matches
Mail list logo
