On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:52:25AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
Just wonder, do you have plans to implement ${!variable} sometimes?
This bashism is very useful:
...
While we're on this topic, I'll mention the bashism I'd like to see
support for -- array variables.
Older versions supported
on 28/04/2010 18:36 Ed Maste said the following:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:52:25AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
Just wonder, do you have plans to implement ${!variable} sometimes?
This bashism is very useful:
...
While we're on this topic, I'll mention the bashism I'd like to see
On 04/28/10 08:36, Ed Maste wrote:
While we're on this topic, I'll mention the bashism I'd like to see
support for
... and I'd like to cast a vote for NOT bloating our sh with features
from more advanced shells. Either we should actually import one of the
more advanced shells (and no, I don't
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 04/28/10 08:36, Ed Maste wrote:
While we're on this topic, I'll mention the bashism I'd like to see
support for
... and I'd like to cast a vote for NOT bloating our sh with features
from more advanced shells. Either we
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:52:25AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 08:43:19PM +, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
Author: jilles
Date: Sun Apr 25 20:43:19 2010
New Revision: 207206
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/207206
Log:
sh: Use stalloc for arith
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 08:43:19PM +, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
Author: jilles
Date: Sun Apr 25 20:43:19 2010
New Revision: 207206
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/207206
Log:
sh: Use stalloc for arith variable names.
This is simpler than the custom memory tracker I
Author: jilles
Date: Sun Apr 25 20:43:19 2010
New Revision: 207206
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/207206
Log:
sh: Use stalloc for arith variable names.
This is simpler than the custom memory tracker I added earlier, and is also
needed by the dash arith code I plan to import.
