Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
That's awesome! Any way I can convince you to fix expand_number() as
well? I got a detailed explanation of what's wrong with it (both before
and after my commits) from bde@ (cc:ed) in private correspondence;
Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk writes:
Somewhat related, there are overflow bugs in humanize_number - for
example df(1) fails to display space from a 100PB filesystem
correctly.
Patch? :)
Attached.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, [utf-8] Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com writes:
Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no writes:
Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk writes:
Somewhat related, there are overflow bugs in humanize_number - for
example df(1) fails to display space from a
On 2010-08-16 10:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk writes:
Somewhat related, there are overflow bugs in humanize_number - for
example df(1) fails to display space from a 100PB filesystem
correctly.
Patch? :)
Attached. This makes humanize_number() work properly
Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk writes:
Somewhat related, there are overflow bugs in humanize_number - for
example df(1) fails to display space from a 100PB filesystem
correctly.
Patch? :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
m...@freebsd.org writes:
I think it's possible for the number to overflow but also not shrink.
e.g. 0x12345678T.
Ah, you're right, I didn't think of that. Thanks.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:34:36 + (UTC)
Dag-Erling Smorgrav d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: des
Date: Sat Aug 14 14:34:36 2010
New Revision: 211304
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211304
Log:
Simplify expand_number() by combining the (unrolled) loop with the
switch.
Author: des
Date: Sat Aug 14 14:34:36 2010
New Revision: 211304
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211304
Log:
Simplify expand_number() by combining the (unrolled) loop with the
switch. Since expand_number() does not accept negative numbers, switch
from int64_t to uint64_t; this
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Dag-Erling Smorgrav d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: des
Date: Sat Aug 14 14:34:36 2010
New Revision: 211304
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211304
Log:
Simplify expand_number() by combining the (unrolled) loop with the
switch. Since
