On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 05:36:03PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:30:02 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
I think the most important reason is to reduce special cases. The POSIX
developers did not want to create a second subset of utilities that are
not available via
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:36:31 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
POSIX make command lines are executed as if by the shell, and if the
make implementation wants to optimize by not executing sh for every
command line, the burden is on it to make it behave the same.
IIRC the man page mentions the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:25:53PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:29:44 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
On FreeBSD, the first two statements are partially false. All sh(1)
builtins that correspond to utilities specified by POSIX (but not
special builtins) have versions
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:30:02 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
I think the most important reason is to reduce special cases. The POSIX
developers did not want to create a second subset of utilities that are
not available via execve() (the first subset is the special builtins).
The burden on
note use of rather than ; which can be very dangerous
In standard scripts I would agree. In FreeBSD pmake, I would disagree,
but it seems that it's the odd man out:
Yes, this is because FreeBSD make still uses the shell's -e
for error detection.
NetBSD (hence bmake) abandoned that quite a
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:35:19PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
Hi, sorry about the slow response.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:49:03 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
Author: obrien
Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
New Revision:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:29:44 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
On FreeBSD, the first two statements are partially false. All sh(1)
builtins that correspond to utilities specified by POSIX (but not
special builtins) have versions accessible to execve() (on 8.x and
That's interesting, especially for
Hi, sorry about the slow response.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:49:03 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
Author: obrien
Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
New Revision: 238563
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
Log:
a ;
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:19:48 -0400, John Baldwin writes:
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ beforeinstall:
cd ${.CURDIR}; \
${INSTALL} -o ${TMACOWN} -g ${TMACGRP} -m ${TMACMODE} \
koi8-r.tmac hyphen.ru ${DESTDIR}${TMACDIR}
-cd ${.OBJDIR}
+cd ${.OBJDIR};
Isn't this a nop now?
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi, sorry about the slow response.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:49:03 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
Author: obrien
Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
New
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 1:57:43 am David E. O'Brien wrote:
Author: obrien
Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
New Revision: 238563
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
Log:
a ; tells make we want the shell to be used
Submitted by: Simon Gerraty s...@juniper.net
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
Author: obrien
Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
New Revision: 238563
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
Log:
a ; tells make we want the shell to be used
Submitted by: Simon Gerraty
Author: obrien
Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
New Revision: 238563
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
Log:
a ; tells make we want the shell to be used
Submitted by: Simon Gerraty s...@juniper.net
Modified:
head/gnu/usr.bin/groff/tmac/Makefile
Modified:
13 matches
Mail list logo
