On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
This method works well in userland too. Instead of assert() or abort(),
use an null dereference, or more portably, a signal
Digressing quite a bit, doesn't abort() send a signal already, i.e.
SIGA
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> This method works well in userland too. Instead of assert() or abort(),
> use an null dereference, or more portably, a signal
Digressing quite a bit, doesn't abort() send a signal already, i.e.
SIGABRT? And doesn't __assert() call abort()?
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 04.04.2013 23:53, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Isn't this a prime candidate to replace with KASSERT()?
It could be, but NULL dereference attempt will crash system no less reliably
then KASSERT.
Much more reliably:
- if INAVRIANTS is not configured,
On 04.04.2013 23:53, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Isn't this a prime candidate to replace with KASSERT()?
It could be, but NULL dereference attempt will crash system no less
reliably then KASSERT.
On 4 April 2013 12:04, Alexander Motin wrote:
Author: mav
Date: Thu Apr 4 19:04:15 2013
New Rev
Hi,
Isn't this a prime candidate to replace with KASSERT()?
Thanks,
Adrian
On 4 April 2013 12:04, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Author: mav
> Date: Thu Apr 4 19:04:15 2013
> New Revision: 249105
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249105
>
> Log:
> MFprojects/camlock r248930:
> Re
Author: mav
Date: Thu Apr 4 19:04:15 2013
New Revision: 249105
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249105
Log:
MFprojects/camlock r248930:
Remove extra NULL checks. d_drv1 can never be NULL during periph life cycle.
MFC after:2 weeks
Modified:
head/sys/cam/ata/ata_da.c
