Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257455
Log:
Make struct ifnet readable and comprehensible again by grouping
and ordering related variables, fields and locks next to each
other. Add more comments to variables.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257455
Log:
Make struct ifnet readable and comprehensible again by grouping
and ordering related variables,
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257455
Log:
Make struct ifnet readable and comprehensible again by
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257455
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
anymore? We pay a pretty heavy price for that requirement in the
drivers of the least
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 21:05 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
anymore? We pay a pretty heavy
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
anymore? We pay a
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
the protocol
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 22:13 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Is there any chance
On 31.10.2013 20:27, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL:
On 31.10.2013 21:15, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 21:05 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 23:17 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 20:27, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:14:57PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 22:13 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013
On 31.10.2013 23:32, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 23:17 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 20:27, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 23:41 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:14:57PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 22:13 +0100:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote
Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 23:41 +0100:
I know of only one modern ARM SoC that's able to DMA network packets on
a 2-byte boundary (actually even it requires a 4-byte boundary, but it's
willing to stuff the first 16 bits with zeroes and offset everything
that
On 31 October 2013 20:22, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 23:41 +0100:
I know of only one modern ARM SoC that's able to DMA network packets on
a 2-byte boundary (actually even it requires a 4-byte boundary, but it's
willing
17 matches
Mail list logo