On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:29:04PM +0200, Jean-S'ebastien P'edron wrote:
> On 10.10.2015 15:37, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote:
> >> That said, I'm not sure a kernel from HEAD will work nicely with
> >> userland from 10.2. That's worth a try.
> >
>
On 10.10.2015 15:37, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote:
>> That said, I'm not sure a kernel from HEAD will work nicely with
>> userland from 10.2. That's worth a try.
>
> well, it should -- otherwise stable/10 jails would not work under -current.
I was
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:43:02AM +, Jean-S'ebastien P'edron wrote:
> Author: dumbbell
> Date: Sat Oct 10 07:43:02 2015
> New Revision: 289109
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/289109
>
> Log:
> drm/i915: Remove "Attempting to unbind pinned buffer" message
>
> This
Author: dumbbell
Date: Sat Oct 10 07:43:02 2015
New Revision: 289109
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/289109
Log:
drm/i915: Remove "Attempting to unbind pinned buffer" message
This error message is removed in later versions of Linux and currently,
it spams users.
PR:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:14:50PM +0200, Jean-S'ebastien P'edron wrote:
> On 10.10.2015 11:35, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:43:02AM +, Jean-S'ebastien P'edron wrote:
> > What about don't worked video playback?
> >
On 10.10.2015 11:35, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:43:02AM +, Jean-S'ebastien P'edron wrote:
> What about don't worked video playback?
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-August/057326.html
Hi!
Hopefully it will be fixed by the coming i915
On 10.10.2015 12:22, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:14:50PM +0200, Jean-S'ebastien P'edron wrote:
>> Hopefully it will be fixed by the coming i915 update. Please see the
>> following wiki article for status update and instructions if you want to
>> test it:
>>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:37:43PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote:
>
> > That said, I'm not sure a kernel from HEAD will work nicely with
> > userland from 10.2. That's worth a try.
>
> well, it should -- otherwise stable/10 jails would not
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote:
> That said, I'm not sure a kernel from HEAD will work nicely with
> userland from 10.2. That's worth a try.
well, it should -- otherwise stable/10 jails would not work under -current.
Not the other way os course.
--
Sincerely,
D.Marck