Randall,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:51:36PM +, Randall Stewart wrote:
R> Author: rrs
R> Date: Fri Nov 13 22:51:35 2015
R> New Revision: 290805
R> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/290805
R>
R> Log:
R> This fixes several places where callout_stops return is examined. The
R>
On 11/13/15 23:51, Randall Stewart wrote:
Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c
==
--- head/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c Fri Nov 13 22:33:51 2015
(r290804)
+++ head/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c Fri Nov 13
Author: rrs
Date: Fri Nov 13 22:51:35 2015
New Revision: 290805
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/290805
Log:
This fixes several places where callout_stops return is examined. The
new return codes of -1 were mistakenly being considered "true". Callout_stop
now returns -1 to
On 11/14/15 00:11, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
What about making callout_stop() return value a enum?
Hi,
If we could make most callout functions return "void" and use mutexes,
this will not be an issue any more!
--HPS
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing
