On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
Yep, but then I had to do this because ef->off is 64 bits even on 32
bit arches, so I got a pointer/int size mismatch warning...
Index: common/load_elf.c
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 01:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 13/01/2016 00:54, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 00:43 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
...
Passes a full tinderbox so I assume your forcing gcc for some
reason?
For several reasons.
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 00:43 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> On 13/01/2016 00:41, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 02:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > > Author: smh
> > > Date: Tue Jan 12 02:17:39 2016
> > > New Revision: 293724
> > > URL:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
> For several reasons. The fact that gcc isn't the default compiler
> doesn't mean that it's okay for code to not compile with gcc; it's
> still a supported compiler for arm.
Agreed. It also makes things messier when
On 2016-01-12 20:05, NGie Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
For several reasons. The fact that gcc isn't the default compiler
doesn't mean that it's okay for code to not compile with gcc; it's
still a supported compiler for arm.
Agreed.
On 13/01/2016 00:54, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 00:43 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 13/01/2016 00:41, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 02:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
Author: smh
Date: Tue Jan 12 02:17:39 2016
New Revision: 293724
URL:
On 13/01/2016 01:10, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-01-12 20:05, NGie Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
For several reasons. The fact that gcc isn't the default compiler
doesn't mean that it's okay for code to not compile with gcc; it's
still
On 13/01/2016 00:41, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 02:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
Author: smh
Date: Tue Jan 12 02:17:39 2016
New Revision: 293724
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293724
Log:
Enable warnings in EFI boot code
Set WARNS if not set for EFI
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 02:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Author: smh
> Date: Tue Jan 12 02:17:39 2016
> New Revision: 293724
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293724
>
> Log:
> Enable warnings in EFI boot code
>
> Set WARNS if not set for EFI boot code and fix the issues
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 01:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> On 13/01/2016 00:54, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 00:43 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > > On 13/01/2016 00:41, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 02:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > > > > Author: smh
>
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 01:17 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> On 13/01/2016 00:54, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Could you detail detail how you're switching to gcc so I an run a
> full pass on that too?
>
> Regards
> Steve
>
>
I have this in the make.conf I use for this
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> Yep, but then I had to do this because ef->off is 64 bits even on 32
> bit arches, so I got a pointer/int size mismatch warning...
>
> Index: common/load_elf.c
>
Author: smh
Date: Tue Jan 12 02:17:39 2016
New Revision: 293724
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293724
Log:
Enable warnings in EFI boot code
Set WARNS if not set for EFI boot code and fix the issues highlighted by
setting it.
Most components are set to WARNS level 6
13 matches
Mail list logo