Re: svn commit: r298655 - head/sys/kgssapi

I don't do stable, and that's my choice to make (and final decision). It would be appropriate to ask, "I'd like to MFC this to stable if it makes sense to do so. Does it make sense?" But I think it is totally inappropriate to try to tell me it is my job to push petty fixes to stable/10, a

Re: svn commit: r298655 - head/sys/kgssapi

You really ought to. When you MFC yourself, it reduces the likelihood of errors, because you understand the change best. When someone else does it, it's more likely he'll make a mistake, because he may not know the fine details behind the change. In fact, it's hard for anybody else to even know

Re: svn commit: r298655 - head/sys/kgssapi

Nope! I don't do stable/. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Alan Somers wrote: > Nice catch. Will you be MFCing this to stable/10? > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Conrad E. Meyer wrote: > >> Author: cem >> Date: Tue Apr 26 18:11:45 2016 >> New

Re: svn commit: r298655 - head/sys/kgssapi

Nice catch. Will you be MFCing this to stable/10? On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Conrad E. Meyer wrote: > Author: cem > Date: Tue Apr 26 18:11:45 2016 > New Revision: 298655 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/298655 > > Log: > kgssapi: Don't leak memory in

svn commit: r298655 - head/sys/kgssapi

Author: cem Date: Tue Apr 26 18:11:45 2016 New Revision: 298655 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/298655 Log: kgssapi: Don't leak memory in error cases Reported by: Coverity CIDs: 1007046, 1007047, 1007048 Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division Modified: