> On Feb 13, 2017, at 22:19, Ed Schouten wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> 2017-02-13 20:53 GMT+01:00 Ngie Cooper :
>> Thanks! Should kqueue(2)/kevent(2) be updated?
>
> I'm really not sure what's best here. On one hand the header no longer
> depends on , but the man page does refer to types and
> iden
Hi there,
2017-02-13 20:53 GMT+01:00 Ngie Cooper :
> Thanks! Should kqueue(2)/kevent(2) be updated?
I'm really not sure what's best here. On one hand the header no longer
depends on , but the man page does refer to types and
identifiers that are no longer declared by simply including this
header.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Author: ed
> Date: Mon Feb 13 19:00:09 2017
> New Revision: 313704
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313704
>
> Log:
> Make work on its own.
>
> Right now this header file doesn't want to build when included on its
> own,
Author: ed
Date: Mon Feb 13 19:00:09 2017
New Revision: 313704
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313704
Log:
Make work on its own.
Right now this header file doesn't want to build when included on its
own, as it depends on some integer types that are only declared
internal
