On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
F> > Author: glebius
F> > Date: Wed May 10 23:32:31 2017
F> > New Revision: 318166
F> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318166
F> >
F> > Log:
F> > There is no good reason for TCP reassembly zone to be UMA_ZONE_NOFREE.
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Author: glebius
> Date: Wed May 10 23:32:31 2017
> New Revision: 318166
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318166
>
> Log:
> There is no good reason for TCP reassembly zone to be UMA_ZONE_NOFREE.
>
> It has strong locking model,
Author: glebius
Date: Wed May 10 23:32:31 2017
New Revision: 318166
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318166
Log:
There is no good reason for TCP reassembly zone to be UMA_ZONE_NOFREE.
It has strong locking model, doesn't have any timers associated with
entries. The entries