svn commit: r346176 - head/sys/sys

2019-09-03 Thread Warner Losh
Author: imp Date: Sat Apr 13 04:46:35 2019 New Revision: 346176 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346176 Log: Fix sbttons for values > 2s Add test against negative times. Add code to cope with larger values properly. Discussed with: bde@ (quite some time ago, for an

Re: svn commit: r346176 - head/sys/sys

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Warner Losh wrote: Fix sbttons for values > 2s Add test against negative times. Add code to cope with larger values properly. Discussed with: bde@ (quite some time ago, for an earlier version) I am unhappy with previous attempted fixes in this area, and still have

Re: svn commit: r346176 - head/sys/sys

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Bruce Evans wrote: On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Warner Losh wrote: Fix sbttons for values > 2s Add test against negative times. Add code to cope with larger values properly. Discussed with: bde@ (quite some time ago, for an earlier version) I am unhappy with previous

Re: svn commit: r346176 - head/sys/sys

2019-04-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Bruce Evans wrote: On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Warner Losh wrote: Fix sbttons for values > 2s Add test against negative times. Add code to cope with larger values properly. Discussed with: bde@ (quite some time ago, for an earlier version) I am unhappy with previous

Re: svn commit: r346176 - head/sys/sys

2019-04-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Warner Losh wrote: Fix sbttons for values > 2s Add test against negative times. Add code to cope with larger values properly. Discussed with: bde@ (quite some time ago, for an earlier version) I am unhappy with previous attempted fixes in this area, and still have

svn commit: r346176 - head/sys/sys

2019-04-12 Thread Warner Losh
Author: imp Date: Sat Apr 13 04:46:35 2019 New Revision: 346176 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346176 Log: Fix sbttons for values > 2s Add test against negative times. Add code to cope with larger values properly. Discussed with: bde@ (quite some time ago, for an