Joerg Sonnenberger schrieb:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:00:37PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2008-12-28 20:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
- ACPI_OBJECT acpiarg[0];
+ ACPI_OBJECT acpiarg[1];
I wonder how does gcc allowed this. It emits warnings only in
pedantic
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:00:37PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2008-12-28 20:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> >>> - ACPI_OBJECT acpiarg[0];
> >>> + ACPI_OBJECT acpiarg[1];
> > I wonder how does gcc allowed this. It emits warnings only in
> > pedantic mode which we cannot u
On 2008-12-28 20:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>>> - ACPI_OBJECT acpiarg[0];
>>> + ACPI_OBJECT acpiarg[1];
> I wonder how does gcc allowed this. It emits warnings only in
> pedantic mode which we cannot use to compile kernel with.
Zero-sized arrays are non-standard, but ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:50:55 -0800
Andrew Thompson mentioned:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 08:48:11PM +, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > Author: stas
> > Date: Sat Dec 27 20:48:11 2008
> > New Revision: 186529
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ba
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 08:48:11PM +, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Author: stas
> Date: Sat Dec 27 20:48:11 2008
> New Revision: 186529
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/186529
>
> Log:
> - Fix incorrect array declaration that was causing the stack overflow
> on some (most?) Asus
Author: stas
Date: Sat Dec 27 20:48:11 2008
New Revision: 186529
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/186529
Log:
- Fix incorrect array declaration that was causing the stack overflow
on some (most?) Asus laptops.
Discussed with: rpaulo
Approved by: kib (mentor)
MFC aft
