Author: ed
Date: Tue Jan 19 23:07:12 2010
New Revision: 202661
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/202661
Log:
Revert r202447 by re-exposing the old uname(3) function.
It makes hardly any sense to expose a symbol which should only be
provided for binary compatibility, but it seems
Thank you.
mcl
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Ed Schouten wrote:
Author: ed
Date: Tue Jan 19 23:07:12 2010
New Revision: 202661
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/202661
Log:
Revert r202447 by re-exposing the old uname(3) function.
It makes hardly any sense to expose a symbol which should only be
provided
* Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Of course it is against standards. This is implicit for most functions,
and the part of the standard that you quoted says it explicitly for
uname():
| The following shall be declared as a function and may also be defined
