On Mon, 21 May 2012, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:24:36 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Author: gleb
Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
New Revision: 235601
URL:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:24:36 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Author: gleb
Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
New Revision: 235601
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
Log:
On 5/21/12 11:27 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:24:36 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
A question about your stat changes: did you expand dev_t to 32 bits
for the AFS folks, or did you leave it as 16 bits?
dev_t is already 32-bit.
Author: gleb
Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
New Revision: 235601
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
Log:
Don't use ino_t in dumprestore protocol definition.
Since ino_t size is about to change to 64-bits, replace ino_t used in
dump protocol definition with 32-bit
On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Author: gleb
Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
New Revision: 235601
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
Log:
Don't use ino_t in dumprestore protocol definition.
Since ino_t size is about to change to 64-bits,
On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Author: gleb
Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
New Revision: 235601
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
Log:
Don't use ino_t in dumprestore protocol definition.